Abstract
This paper explores the Aristotelian context of the real distinction between existence and essence thought to be posited in Thomas Aquinas’ early work De Ente Et Essentia. In doing so, the paper situates its own position in the context of contemporary scholarship and in relation to the contemporary trend to downplay Aristotle’s influence in Thomas Aquinas’ philosophy. The paper argues that re-reading De Ente Et Essentia in this way sheds new light on some of the crucial debates in contemporary Thomist scholarship, particularly with respect to the analogous relation between potency and act: essence and existence, the distinction between conceptual and causal explanation, and the relationship between philosophy and theology in the thought of Thomas Aquinas.
References
Aristotle. 1957. On the Soul, W. H. Hett (trans.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-soul.1957Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle. 2003. Metaphysics, Hugh Tredennick (trans.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bobik, Joseph. 1965. Aquinas on Being and Essence: A Translation and Interpretation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brook, Angus. March 2015. “Substance and the Primary Sense of Being in Aristotle.” The Review of Metaphysics LXVIII (3): Issue 271: 521–544.Search in Google Scholar
Cajetan. 1964. Commentary on St Thomas Aquinas’ on Being and Essence, Kendzierski and Wade (trans.,). Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Corrigan, Kevin. 1984. “A Philosophical Precursor to the Theory of Essence and Existence in St Thomas Aquinas.” Thomist 48 (2): 219–240.10.1353/tho.1984.0040Search in Google Scholar
Dougherty, M. V. 2004. “Aristotle’s Four Truth Values.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4): 585–609.10.1080/0960878042000279288Search in Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio. September 1966. “The Transcendentality of Ens-Esse and the Ground of Metaphysics.” International Philosophical Quarterly 6 (3): 329–427.10.5840/ipq1966634Search in Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio. 1970. “Platonism, Neo-Platonism and Thomism: Convergencies and Divergencies.” The New Scholasticism 44 (1): 69–100.10.5840/newscholas19704413Search in Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio, and B. M. Bonansea. March 1974. “The Intensive Hermeneutics of Thomistic Philosophy: the Notion of Participation.” The Review of Metaphysics 27 (3): 449–491.Search in Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne. 1959. Elements of Christian Philosophy. New York: Doubleday & Co.Search in Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne. 1961. Being and Some Philosophers. The Hague: Europe Printing.10.1163/9789004452282Search in Google Scholar
Guagliardo, O. P., A. Vincent, ed. 1996. “Introduction.” In Commentary on the Book of Causes. Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
Heinaman, Robert. 1981. “Knowledge of Substance in Aristotle.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 101: 63–77.10.2307/629844Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence. 1988. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles H. 2012. Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kerr, Gaven. 2015. Aquinas’s Way to God: the Proof in De Ente Et Essentia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224806.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Knasas, John F. X. 2014. “The Intellectual Phenomenology of De Ente Et Essentia, Chapter Four.” The Review of Metaphysics 68 (1): 107–153.Search in Google Scholar
Kosman, Aryeh. 2013. The Activity of Being. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674075023Search in Google Scholar
Kosman, Aryeh. 2014. Virtues of Thought: Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge MA: harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674416437Search in Google Scholar
Masiello, Ralph J. 1971. “A Note on Essence and Existence.” The New Scholasticism 45: 491–494.10.5840/newscholas197145352Search in Google Scholar
McCleod, Owen. January 1995. “Aristotle’s Method.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1): 1–18.Search in Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph. 1998. “Introduction.” In Thomas Aquinas: Selected Writings. London: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph, ed. 2006. Praeambula Fidei: Thomism and the God of the Philosophers. Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
Novak, Michael. September 1963. “A Key to Aristotle’s ‘substance’.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (1): 1–19.10.2307/2104489Search in Google Scholar
Owens, Joseph. 1976. “Aquinas on Knowing Existence.” The Review of Metaphysics 29 (4): 670–690.Search in Google Scholar
Owens, Joseph. 1981. “Stages and Distinction in De Ente: a Rejoinder.” Thomist 45(1): 99–123.10.1353/tho.1981.0046Search in Google Scholar
Owens, Joseph. 2007. Aristotle’s Gradations of Being in Metaphysics E-Z. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press.Search in Google Scholar
Patt, Walter. 1988. “Aquinas’s Real Distinction and Some Interpretations.” The New Scholasticism 62 (1): 1–29.10.5840/newscholas198862132Search in Google Scholar
Reale, Giovanni. 1980. The Concept of First Philosophy and the Unity of the Metaphysics of Aristotle, John R. Catan (Trans. & Ed.). Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sweeney, Leo. 1963. “Existence/Essence in Thomas Aquinas’s Early Writings.” Proceedings of The American Catholic Philosophical Association.Search in Google Scholar
Twetten, David B. 2006. “Really Distinguishing Essence from Esse.” Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics 6: 57–94.10.2307/j.ctt284wtj.8Search in Google Scholar
Wedin, Michael. 2000. Aristotle’s Theory of Substance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. 1979. “Aquinas’ Route to the Real Distinction: A Note on De Ente Et Essentia.” Thomist 43(2): 279–295.10.1353/tho.1979.0033Search in Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. March 2015. “Cornelio Fabro on the Distinction and Composition of Essence and Esse in the Metaphysics of Thomas Aquinas.” The Review of Metaphysics LXVII (3): 573–592.10.2307/j.ctv1z5230m.8Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
