Skip to main content
Log in

The problem of properties in quantum mechanics

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The properties of classical and quantum systems are characterized by different algebraic structures. We know that the properties of a quantum mechanical system form a partial Boolean algebra not embeddable into a Boolean algebra, and so cannot all be co-determinate. We also know that maximal Boolean subalgebras of properties can be (separately) co-determinate. Are there larger subsets of properties that can be co-determinate without contradiction? Following an analysis of Bohrs response to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen objection to the complementarity interpretation of quantum mechanics, a principled argument is developed justifying the selection of particular subsets of properties as co-determinate for a quantum system in particular physical contexts. These subsets are generated by sets of maximal Boolean subalgebras, defined in each case by the relation between the quantum state and a measurement (possibly, but not necessarily, the measurement in terms of which we seek to establish whether or not a particular property of the system in question obtains). If we are required to interpret quantum mechanics in this way, then predication for quantum systems is quite unlike the corresponding notion for classical systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: 1935, Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N.: 1935, Phys. Rev. 48, 696–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: 1951, Quantum Theory, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. and Aharonov, Y.: 1957, Phys. Rev. 108, 1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bub, J.: 1982, Phil. Sci. 49, 402–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bub, J.: 1989, Found. Phys. 19, 793–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d'Espagnat, B.: 1976, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Me- chanics, Second Edition, W.A. Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts, p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A.: 1986, The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, A. M.: 1957, J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, G.: 1987, Phil. Sci. 54, 558–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. I. G.: 1989, The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen, S. and Specker, E. P.: 1967, J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, A. I. M.: 1986, Quantum Mechanics, Second Edition, Adam Hilger, Bristol, p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, M.: 1987, Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism: A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stairs, A.: 1989, ‘“ Realism” and Contextualism: Cut and Paste with Hubert Space’, preprint.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bub, J. The problem of properties in quantum mechanics. Topoi 10, 27–34 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136020

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136020

Keywords

Navigation