Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:12:45.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Angora Resolution of the Stage Guild

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Extract

In the series of copies from Angora inscriptions by Mr. d'Orbeliani there are none for which we owe him a greater debt than those numbered ‘Orb. 41’ (pp. 33–36 of this volume).

They represent, first (Fig. 19), the dedication on the pedestal made for a statue of Ulpius Aelius Pompeianus, benefactor of ‘The Sacred Hadrianic Stage Guild’; secondly (Fig. 20), the full text, engraved on the same stone, of the resolution by which the Guild authorised the erection of that statue and the granting to Pompeianus of other honours. This latter document, thanks to the thirty-four lines added by the new copy, is now the most complete example that we possess of such a psephisma; except for the last three lines and for a few words and unknown names, it can, as the copyist claims, ‘be fully read.’ The text of the dedication (I.G. Rom. iii. 211) and of most of the preamble to the resolution (I.G. Rom. iii. 209) have been known since 1885, but the closeness of their connexion and the sketch of the monument (Fig. 19) are new and welcome data. In view of its importance, recently emphasised by Ramsay, the resolution seems worth repeating in revised form, with the epigraphic copy. Variations between that and the printed text are marked by the usual round brackets, but only a few of the words restored seem to require explanation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (I.G. xiv. 2495), or (ll. 7–8; Benndorf, , Reisen in Lyk. u. Kar. i. p. 123Google Scholar, n. 96), was the short title, followed in formal documents by the elaborate verbiage of our texts.

2 Stud. in the Roman Prov. Galatia, , J.R.S. xii. 1922, p. 162Google Scholar, n. 3, p. 174.

3 The reading should be

4 Sir W. M. Bamsay believes that the father of our Ulpius Aelius is found mentioned at the hieron near Pisidian Antioch, and kindly informs me that the man's name was M. Ulpius Pudens Pompeianus; cf. J.R.S. xii. 1922, p. 163, n. 1.

5 He is described as ll. 1–6, 60–65. The ethnic Μαίων by no means rare, seems probable. For the omission of καί cf. Klio, viii. 1908, p.417, 1. 18.

6 That the Guild exercised trade-union functions respecting rates of pay, etc., cannot as yet be shown, but a feature suggesting that it did so is its inclusion of the συναγωνισταί (ll. 6–7), i.e. the assistants, from some of whom, if not admitted to the Guild, awkward competition might have arisen.

7 Cf. the remarks on the bakers' strike at Ephesus, in Anatolian Studies pr. to Ramsay, p. 30 f.Google Scholar

8 J. of Egypt. Arch. x. 1924, p. 143.