Abstract
This study investigated how the social identities assumed by individuals as part of their professional roles influence the nature and use of a range of rationalizations for their corruption or the corrupt acts of others. Thirty senior Indonesian public servants were interviewed about the causes and factors that perpetuated corruption during the Suharto era, and how they rationalized corrupt behavior within the role of being a civil servant. Findings revealed that corruption was routine and embedded in the daily activities and administrative structures of Indonesian public servants. Rationalizing ideologies that supported corruption included a denial of responsibility, social weighting and an appeal to higher loyalties. Central to these rationalizations were explanations around the low levels of civil service salaries, poor accountability, and corrupt leadership at senior levels of the government. However, the expression of these rationalizations varied across three social or role identities of the Indonesian civil servant: the professional civil servant, the collegial civil servant, and the corrupt civil servant. The implications of these findings for interventions in organizations in developing countries are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identity theory. Constructive and critical advances. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Akerlof, G. A., & Yellen, J. (1990). The fair wage effort hypothesis and unemployment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2), 255–283.
Alatas, V., Cameron, L., Chaudhuri, A., Erkal, N., & Gangadharan, L. (2009). Subject pool effects in a corruption experiment: A comparison of Indonesian public servants and Indonesian students. Experimental Economics, 12(1), 113–132.
Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge intensive firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2007). Reflective methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 9–23.
Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.
Ashforth, B. E., Gioa, D., Robinson, S., & Trevino, L. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.
Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, September, 1320–1346.
Beugré, C. D. (2010). Resistance to socialization into organizational corruption: A model of deontic justice. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 533–541.
Bhargava, V., & Bolongaita, E. (2004). Challenging corruption in Asia: Case studies and a framework for action. Washington: The World Bank.
Booth, A. (2007). Colonial legacies: Economic and social development in East and Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
Brown, R. A. (2006). Indonesian corporations, cronyism, and corruption. Modern Asian Studies, 40(4), 953–992.
Brown, A. D., & Jones, M. (2000). Honorable members and dishonorable deeds: Sensemaking, impression management and legitimation in the ‘Arms to Iraq Affair’. Human Relations, 53(5), 655–689.
Choi, J-W. (2009). What holds Indonesia back? Structural roots of corruption and reform. Paper presented at the 2009 Korean Association for Public Administration International Conference, October 22–24, University of Incheon at Songdo Campus, Korea.
Cressey, D. R. (1986). Why managers commit fraud. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 19, 195–209.
den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kaptein, M. (2008). Spiraling down into corruption: A dynamic analysis of the social identity process that cause corruption in organizations to grow. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 133–146.
Dwiputrianti, S., & Lan, S. (2011). Scope of auditing on the quality of content in the Indonesian external public sector auditing reports. International Review of Public Administration, 16(3), 133–149.
Earle, J. S., Spicer, A., & Peter, K. S. (2010). The normalization of deviant organizational practices: Wage arrears in Russia, 1991–98. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 218–237.
Filmer, D., & Lindauer, D. L. (2001). Does Indonesia have a ‘low pay’ civil service? Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 37(2), 189–205.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative data research. New York: Aldine.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Goodpaster, G. (2002). Reflection on corruption in Indonesia. In T. Lindsey & H. Dick (Eds.), Corruption in Asia: Rethinking the governance paradigm. Sydney: Federation Press.
Grube, J., & Piliavin, J. A. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences, and volunteer experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1108–1120.
Haynes, K. (2010). Other lives in accounting: Critical reflections on oral history in action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21, 221–231.
Hill, H. (2000). The Indonesian economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of inter-group relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
Hoogvelt, A. M. M. (2001). Globalization and the postcolonial world: The new political economy of development. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Imbaruddin, A. (1997). Corruption in Indonesia: Causes, forms and remedies. Development Bulletin, 42(July), 12–15.
Khan, M. H. (1998). Patron-client networks and the economic effects of corruption in Asia. European Journal of Development Research, 10(1), 15–39.
King, D. Y. (2000). Corruption in Indonesia: A curable cancer? Journal of International Affairs, 53(2), 603–624.
Kingsbury, D. (2004). Key issues in development. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kompas, T. (1998). Gaji pokok pegawai negeri tak penuhi biaya hidup minimum. Kompas. Jakarta: Edisi Senin.
Kristiansen, S., & Ramil, M. (2006). Buying an income: The market for civil service positions in Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 28(2), 207–233.
Macfarling, I. (1996). The dual function of the Indonesian armed forces: Military politics in Indonesia. Canberra: Australian Defence Studies Centre.
Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 750–770.
Morrison, E. W., & Bies, R. J. (1991). Impression management in the feedback-seeking process: A literature review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 522–541.
Olken, B. A. (2007). Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115(21), 200–249.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Pellegrini, L. (2011). Corruption, development and the environment. New York: Dordrecht.
Pinto, J., Leanna, C. R., & Frits, K. P. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 685–709.
Randall, V., & Theobald, R. (1998). Political change and underdevelopment: A critical introduction to third world politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stasavage, D. (2000). Causes and consequences of corruption: Mozambigue in transition. In A. Doig & R. Theobald (Eds.), Corruption and democratization (pp. 65–97). London: Frank Cass.
Suryadinata, (1998). Interpreting Indonesian politics. Singapore: Times Academic Press.
Sveningsson, S., & Alvesson, M. (2003). Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle. Human Relations, 56(10), 1163–1193.
Tanzi, V. (1998, December). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. IMF Staff Papers, 45(4), 559–594.
Theobald, R. (1990). Corruption, development and underdevelopment. Durham: Duke University Press.
Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.
UU-Otonomi-Daerah. (1999). Undang-undang otonomi daerah. Bandung: Kuraiko Pratama Bandung.
Zyglidopoulos, S. C., & Fleming, P. J. (2008). Ethical distance in corrupt firms: How do innocent bystanders become guilty perpetrators? Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 265–274.
Zyglidopoulos, C. S., Fleming, P., & Rothenberg, S. (2009). Rationalization, overcompensation and the escalation of corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 65–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Budiman, A., Roan, A. & Callan, V.J. Rationalizing Ideologies, Social Identities and Corruption Among Civil Servants in Indonesia During the Suharto Era. J Bus Ethics 116, 139–149 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1451-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1451-y