Abstract
New Zealand and United Kingdom governments have set new directives for increased consultation with the public about health care. Set against a legacy of modest success with past engagement with public consultations, this paper considers potentially adverse ethical implications of the new directives. Drawing on experiences from New Zealand and the United Kingdom, and on an Orthodox Jewish perspective, the paper seeks to answer two questions: What conditions can compromise the ethics of public consultation? How can the public respond ethically to consultation? In answering these questions, the paper considers how Orthodox Judaism, as a specific positive morality, can aid the development of public policy. It is suggested that an Orthodox Jewish perspective does not require limiting the content of public consultations and helps to define a common procedural morality binding Jews and non-Jews. This procedural morality requires avoiding two conditions that, as shown from Jewish texts, make public consultation unethical. These are “overpreparation” and “underpreparation.” Members of the public who deem a consultation unethical should give feedback not on the proposal but on the conditions they perceive to prevent the consulting party from considering their viewpoints on the proposal.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Amsel, N. (1996) The Jewish Encyclopedia of Moral and Ethical Issues. Northvale: Jason Aronson Inc.
Bava Mezia 4: 10.
Bava Kamma 10: 14.
Borowitz, E.B. (1987) Freedom. In A. Cohen and P. Mendes-Flohr (Eds.), Contemporary Jewish Religious Thought. Original Essays on Critical Concepts, Movements and Beliefs (pp. 261-267). New York: The Free Press.
Bowling, A., Jacobson, B. and Southgate, L. (1993) Explorations in Consultation of the Public and Health Professionals on Priority Setting in an Inner London Health District. Social Science and Medicine 37, 851-857.
Department of Health (1994) Code of Conduct/Code of Accountability. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (1999) Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS. London: HMSO.
Department of Health (2002) Transition Advisory Board—Patient and Public Involvement in Health. Progress Report April 2002. www.doh.gov.uk/involvingpatients/tab.htm
Engelhardt, H.T. (1996) The Foundations of Bioethics. Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Genesis, Rabbah 54: 3.
Grodin, M.A. (1995) Halakhic Dilemmas in Modern Medicine. Journal of Clinical Ethics 6, 218-221.
Harrison, S. and Mort, M. (1998) Which Champions Which People—Public and User Involvement in Health Care as a Technology of Legitimation. Social Policy and Administration 32, 60-70.
Harrison, S., Dowswell, G. and Milewa, T. (2002) Guest Editorial: Public and User Involvement in the UK National Health Service. Health and Social Care in the Community 10, 63-66.
Health Funding Authority (1998) The Next Five Years in General Practice. Auckland: Health Funding Authority.
Health Funding Authority (2000) Consultation Obligations and Guidelines. Christchurch: Health Funding Authority (internal document).
Hullin 94a: 53.
Jordan, J., Dowswell, T., Harrison, S., Lilford, R.J. and Mort, M. (1998) Health Needs Assessment: Whose Priorities? Listening to Users and the Public. British Medical Journal 316, 1668-1670.
King, A. (2000) The Future Shape of Primary Health Care. A Discussion Document. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
Leviticus 19: 14.
Leviticus 19: 17.
Lichtenstein, A. (1981) The Seven Laws of Noah. New York: The Rabbi Jacob Joseph School Press.
Litva, A. et al. (2002) ‘The Public is Too Subjective’: Public Involvement at Different Levels of Health-care Decision Making. Social Science and Medicine 54, 1825-1837.
Minister of Health (1993) Health and Disability Services Act 1993, s. 34.
Minister of Health (2000a) Memorandum to Cabinet Business Committee. Health and Disability Sector Changes and Their implementation. Wellington: Office of the Minister of Health.
Minister of Health (2000b) New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000. Wellington: Office of the Minister of Health.
NHS Management Executive (1991) Moving Forward—Needs, Services and Contracts. A DHA project paper. London: NHS Management Executive.
NHS Management Executive (1992) Local Voices: The View of Local People in Purchasing For Health. London: NHS Management Executive.
NHS Management Executive (1993) Purchasing for Health: A Framework for Action. London: NHS Management Executive.
Novak, D. (1983) The Image of the Non-Jew in Judaism. An Historical and Constructive Study of the Noahide Laws. Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
Peck, E. (1998) Integrity, Ambiguity or Duplicity? NHS Consultation With the Public. Health Services Management Research 11, 201-210.
per McGechan, J. (1993) Adopted by the Court of Appeal in Wellington International Airport v Air New Zealand 1 NZLR 671, p. 675.
Prager, D. and Telushkin, J. (1981) The Nine Questions People Ask About Judaism. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Public Health Commission (1994) Consultation Guidelines. Wellington: Public Health Commission.
Shabbat 31a.
Shabbat 146b.
Shickle, D. (1997) Public Preferences for Health Care: Prioritisation in the United Kingdom. Bioethics 11, 277-290.
Summers, A. and McKeown, K. (1996) Local Voices: Evolving a Realistic Strategy on Public Consultation. Public Health 110, 145-150.
Ta'amit 11a.
Telushkin, J. (1994) Jewish Wisdom. Ethical, Spiritual and Historical Lessons from the Great Works and Thinkers. New York: William Morrow and Company.
Welsh Office (1991) Health: A Charter for Patients in Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Office.
Yevamot 21a.
Yevamot 65b.
Zoloth-Dorfman, L. (1995) Face to Face, not Eye to Eye: Further Conversations on Jewish Medical Ethics. Journal of Clinical Ethics 6, 222-231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buetow, S. The Ethics of Public Consultation in Health Care: An Orthodox Jewish Perspective. Health Care Analysis 11, 151–160 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025605113670
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025605113670