Abstract
Recent developments in the cognitive sciences and artificial intelligence suggest ways of answering the most serious challenge to Peirce's notion of abduction. Either there is no such logical process as abduction or, if abduction is a form of inference, it is essentially unconscious and therefore beyond rational control so that it lacks any normative significance. Peirce himself anticipates and attempts to answer this challenge. Peirce argues that abduction is both a source of creative insight and a form of logical inference subject to a degree of conscious control. In this paper I shall sketch a developing account of abduction that is suggested by the work of Paul Churchland, Paul Thagard, Chris Eliasmith, William Wimsatt, Owen Flanagan, and others. I shall argue that a credible account of abduction will require that we approach the phenomenon from both higher and lower levels as represented by these approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burton, R. G. (1993), ‘Reduction, Elimination, and Strategic Interdependence’, in R. G. Burton, ed., Natural and Artificial Minds. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 231–243.
Churchland, P. M. (1989), A Neurocomputational Perspective, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Churchland, P. M. (1995), The Engine of Reason, the Seat of the Soul, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Eliasmith, C. and Thagard, P. (ms), ‘Integrating Structure and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Analogical Mapping,’ (unpublished).
Flanagan, O. (1991), The Science of the Mind, second edition, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Flanagan, O. (1992), Consciousness Reconsidered, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P. (1948), ‘Studies in the Logic of Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 15, pp. 135–175.
Josephson, J. R. and Josephson, S. G. (1994), Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, and Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kapitan, T. (1997), ‘Peirce and the Structure of Abductive Inference’, in N. Houser, D. D. Roberts, and J. V. Evra, eds., Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 477–496.
Lakoff, G. (1987), Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Libet, B. (1985), ‘Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, pp. 529–566.
Nelkin, N. (1993), ‘The Connection between Intentionality and Consciousness’, in M. Davies and G. W. Humphreys, eds., Consciousness, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 224–239.
Peirce, C. S. (1935/1958), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, eds. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (vols. 1-6, 1935) and ed. Arthur Burks (vols. 7-8, 1958), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rosch, E. (1981), ‘Prototype Classification and Logical Classification: The Two Systems’, in E. Scholnick, ed., New Trends in Cognitive Representation: Challenges to Piaget's Theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thagard, P. (1988), Computational Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Wimsatt, W. C. (1976), ‘Reductionism, Levels of Organization, and the Mind-Body Problem’, in G. Globus, G. Maxwell, and I. Savodnik, eds., Consciousness and the Brain, NewYork, NY: Plenum Press, pp. 205–267.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burton, R.G. A Neurocomputational Approach to Abduction. Minds and Machines 9, 257–265 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008282804997
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008282804997