Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:03:42.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LEARNING TO LISTEN: EPISTEMIC INJUSTICE AND THE CHILD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2016

Michael D. Burroughs  and
Deborah Tollefsen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Epistemic Injustice Miranda Fricker argues that there is a distinctively epistemic type of injustice in which someone is wronged specifically in his or her capacity as a knower. Fricker's examples of identity-prejudicial credibility deficit primarily involve gender, race, and class, in which individuals are given less credibility due to prejudicial stereotypes. We argue that children, as a class, are also subject to testimonial injustice and receive less epistemic credibility than they deserve. To illustrate the prevalence of testimonial injustice against children we document examples of negative prejudicial treatment in forensic contexts where children frequently act as testifiers. These examples, along with research on the child's competence and reliability as a testifier, reveal widespread epistemic prejudice against children. Given that subjection to prejudice can have a detrimental impact on children we discuss ways to ameliorate this form of testimonial injustice. We argue that, both in formal and natural contexts, the child's testimony should be evaluated alongside the relationships that support (or fail to support) her development as a testifier. The adult can play a central role in creating successful testimonial interactions with children by acting as a “responsible hearer.”

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 359 - 377
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aries, P. 1962. Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life. Translated by Baldick, Robert. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Bluebond-Langner, M. 1978. The Private Worlds of Dying Children. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boiven, M. and Begin, G. 1989. ‘Peer Status and Self-perception Among Early Elementary School Children: The Case of the Rejected Children.’ Child Development, 1989: 591–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. and Reyna, V. F. 2012. ‘Reliability of Children's Testimony in the Era of Developmental Reversals.’ Developmental Review, 32: 224–67.Google Scholar
Carel, H. and Kidd, I. J. 2014. ‘Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare: A Philosophical Analysis.’ Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 17: 529–40.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J. and Bruck, M. 1993. ‘Suggestibility of the Child Witness: A Historical Review and Synthesis.’ Psychological Bulletin, 113: 403–39.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J. and Bruck, M. 1994. ‘How Reliable Are Children's Statements? … It Depends.’ Family Relations, 43: 255–7.Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cole, D. A. 1991. ‘Change in Self-Perceived Competence as a Function of Peer and Teacher Evaluation.’ Developmental Psychology, 27: 682–8.Google Scholar
Cole, D. A., Martin, J. M., and Powers, B. 1997. ‘A Competency-based Model of Child Depression: A Longitudinal Study of Peer, Parent, Teacher, and Self-evaluations.’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38: 505–14.Google Scholar
Cole, D. A., Jacquez, F. M., and Maschman, T. L. 2001. ‘Social Origins of Depressive Cognitions: A Longitudinal Study of Self-Perceived Competence in Children.’ Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25: 377–95.Google Scholar
Coles, R. 1986. The Moral Life of Children. New York, NY: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Coles, R. 2003. Children of Crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Cousins, J. 1999. Listening to Four Year Olds: How They Can Help Us Plan Their Education and Care. London: The National Early Years Network.Google Scholar
Delfos, M. F. 2001. Are You Listening to Me? Communicating with Children from Four to Twelve Years Old. Amsterdam: SWP Publishers.Google Scholar
Dotson, K. 2012. ‘A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression.’ Frontiers, 33: 24–47.Google Scholar
Fivush, R. and Schwarzmueller, A. 1995. ‘Say It Once Again: Effects of Repeated Questions on Children's Event Recall.’ Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8: 555–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, R., Spatz Widom, C., Browne, K., Ferguson, D., Webb, E., and Janson, S. 2009. Lancet 373: 68–81.Google Scholar
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., and Haith, M. M. 1984. ‘Jurors’ Reactions to Child Witnesses.’ Journal of Social Issues, 40: 139–56.Google Scholar
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., Helgeson, V. S., Haith, M. M., and Michelli, J. 1987. ‘When A Child Takes the Stand: Jurors’ Perceptions of Childrens’ Eyewitness Testimony.’ Law and Human Behavior, 11: 27–40.Google Scholar
Heydon, J. 1984. Evidence: Cases and Materials, 2nd edition. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Translated by Anderson, Joel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hymel, S. and Franke, S. 1985. ‘Children's Peer Relations: Assessing Self-perceptions.’ In Schneider, B. H., Rubin, K. H., and Ledingham, J. E. (eds), Children's Peer Relations: Issues in Assessment and Intervention, pp. 75–91. New York, NY: Spring-Verlag.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. 1999. Images of Savages: Ancient Roots of Modern Prejudice in Western Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenks, C. 2005. Childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 2006. ‘The Nature of Testimony.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 87: 177–97.Google Scholar
Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Company. 1976. American Jurisprudence, 2nd edition. Rochester, NY: Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Leippe, M. R. and Romanczyk, A. 1989. ‘Reactions to Child (Versus Adult) Eyewitnesses: The Influence of Jurors’ Preconceptions and Witness Behavior.’ Law and Human Behavior, 13: 103–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leippe, M. R., Manion, A. P., and Romanczyk, A. 1993. ‘Discernibility or Discrimination? Understanding Jurors’ Reactions to Accurate and Inaccurate Child and Adult Witnesses.’ In Goodman, G. S. and Bottoms, B. L. (eds), Child Victims, Child Witnesses: Understanding and Improving Testimony, pp. 169–201. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
L'Engle, M. 1972. A Circle of Quiet. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Loughnan, S. and Haslam, N. 2007. ‘Animals and Androids: Implicit Associations Between Social Categories and Nonhumans.’ Psychological Science, 18: 116–21.Google Scholar
Melton, G. B. 1981. ‘Children's Competency to Testify.’ Law and Human Behavior, 5: 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. E. B., Saywitz, K. J., and Goodman, G. S. 1996. ‘Psychological Research on Children and Witnesses: Practical Implications for Forensic Interviews and Courtroom Testimony.’ Pacific Law Journal, 28: 3–91.Google Scholar
Murris, K. 2013. ‘The Epistemic Challenge of Hearing Child's Voice.’ Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32: 245–59.Google Scholar
Nathanson, R. and Saywitz, K. J. 2003. ‘The Effects of the Courtroom Context on Children's Memory and Anxiety.’ Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 31: 67–98.Google Scholar
Newcombe, P. A. and Bransgrove, J. 2007. ‘Perceptions of Witness Credibility: Variations Across Age.’ Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28: 318–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, K. 2007. ‘Can We Believe What Children Tell Us?’ Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 43: 843–7.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. 1984. ‘The Illusion of Incompetence Among Academically Competent Children.’ Child Development, 55: 2000–16.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. 1987. ‘Socialization of Perceived Academic Competence Among Highly Competent Children.’ Child Development, 58: 1308–20.Google Scholar
Pierce, C. M. and Allen, G. 1975. ‘Childism.’ Psychiatric Annals, 5: 15–24.Google Scholar
Pipe, M.-E., Lamb, M. E., Yael Orbach, Y., and Esplin, P. W. 2004. ‘Recent Research on Children's Testimony about Experienced and Witnessed Events.’ Developmental Review, 24: 440–68.Google Scholar
Prout, A. 2005. The Future of Childhood: Towards the Interdisciplinary Study of Children. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
Prout, A. and James, A. (eds) 1990. ‘A New Paradigm for the Sociology of Childhood? Provenance, Promise, and Problems.’ In Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood, pp. 7–34. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Saywitz, K. J. and Snyder, L. 1993. ‘Improving Children's Testimony with Preparation.’ In Goodman, G. S. and Bottoms, B. L. (eds), Child Victims, Child Witnesses: Understanding and Improving Testimony, pp. 117–46. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Saywitz, K. J., Snyder, L. and Camparo, L. 1998. ‘Interviewing Child Witnesses: A Developmental Perspective.’ Child Abuse and Neglect, 22: 825–43.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1994. ‘The Politics of Recognition.’ In Gutman, A. (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, pp. 25–74. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, E. 2004. ‘Discrimination Against Children.’ Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89: 804–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yarmey, A. D. and Jones, H. P. T. 1983. “Is the Psychology of Eyewitness Identification a Matter of Common Sense?’ In Lloyd-Bostock, S. M. A. and Clifford, B. R. (eds), Evaluating Witness Evidence: Recent Psychological Research and New Perspectives, pp. 13–40. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Young-Bruehl, E. 2012. Childism. Confronting Prejudice Against Children. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar