Skip to main content
Log in

Phillips and realists on religious beliefs and the fruits thereof

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses some issues concerning the relation between religious beliefs and the fruits of those beliefs, where ‘fruits’ implies certain relevant forms of behaviour and affective attitudes. My primary aim is to elucidate the dispute between D. Z. Phillips and theological realists, emphasizing the extent to which this dispute is symptomatic of a deeper disagreement over how words acquire their meanings. In the course of doing so, I highlight an important difference between two alternative realist claims, exemplified by Trigg and Hick respectively, and draw attention to an infelicity in Phillips’ way of presenting his case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Conant J. (1998) Wittgenstein on meaning and use. Philosophical Investigations 21(3): 222–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glock H.-J. (1996) A Wittgenstein dictionary. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker P.M.S. (1996) Wittgenstein’s place in twentieth-century analytic philosophy. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick J. (1993) Believing—and having true beliefs. In: Runzo J.(eds) Is God real?. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 115–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm N. (1964) Is it a religious belief that ‘God exists’?. In: Hick J.(eds) Faith and the philosophers. Macmillan, London, pp 103–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Penelhum T. (1983) God and skepticism: A study in skepticism and fideism. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips D.Z. (1965) The concept of prayer. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips D.Z. (1970) Faith and philosophical enquiry. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips D.Z. (1993) On really believing. In: Runzo J.(eds) Is God real?. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 85–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. Z. (2004). Religion and friendly fire: Examining assumptions in contemporary philosophy of religion. Aldershot: Ashgate.

  • Swinburne R. (2001) Philosophical theism. In: Phillips D.Z., Tessin T.(eds) Philosophy of religion in the twenty-first century. Basingstoke, Palgrave, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg R. (1973) Reason and commitment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2001) [1953]. Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.) (G. E. M. Anscombe Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikel Burley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burley, M. Phillips and realists on religious beliefs and the fruits thereof. Int J Philos Relig 64, 141–153 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9171-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9171-z

Keywords

Navigation