Skip to main content
Log in

The Port-Royal semantics of terms

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

It is tempting to say from the contemporary point of view that thePort-Royal Logic is full of confusions as well as insights. I have focused on several of these confusions and their relations, in particular the confusions between complex idea and proposition, between proposition and judgment, and especially between name and predicate. In particular I have tried to emphasize the instability of the Port-Royal semantics — the ways in which their theory of terms vacillates between earlier views and something closer to a modern analysis. It may, however, be more profitable to regard this work as incorporating several logics, and to view the confusions as the inevitable results of the dynamical tensions among these different views.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnauld, Antoine, and Claude Lancelot: 1975,General and Rational Grammar: The Port-Royal Grammar, ed. and trans. Jacques Rieux and Bernard E. Rollin, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnauld, Antoine, et Pierre Nicole: 1981,La logique ou l'art de penser, édition critique par Pierre Clair et François Girbal, J. Vrin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buroker, Jill Vance: 1993, ‘Judgment and Predication in thePort-Royal Logic’, in Elmar Kremer (ed.),Essays on Arnauld, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René: 1985,The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, 2 vols., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael: 1981,Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: 1959,The Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. J. L. Austin, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: 1966,Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. and trans. P. Geach and M. Black, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: 1967,The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, trans. and ed. Montgomery Furth, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: 1979,Posthumous Writings, eds. Hans Hermes, Friedrich Kambartel, and Friedrich Kaulbach, trans. Peter Long and Roger White, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, Peter Thomas: 1962,Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1970,Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith, St. Martin's Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1974,Logic, trans. Robert S. Hartman and Wolfgang Schwarz, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluga, Hans: 1980,Gottlob Frege, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spade, Paul: 1982, ‘The Semantics of Terms’, in Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny, and Jan Pinborg (eds.),The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 188–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, John M.: 1979, ‘Definability and Logical Structure in Frege’,Journal of the History of Philosophy 17, 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, John M.: 1988,Chance and Structure, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buroker, J.V. The Port-Royal semantics of terms. Synthese 96, 455–475 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064012

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064012

Keywords

Navigation