Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T01:17:30.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Structure of Emotion: From Dismissal to Dialogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Sylvia Burrow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How much power does emotional dismissal have over the oppressed's ability to trust outlaw emotions, or to stand for such emotions before others? I discuss Sue Campbell's view of the interpretation of emotion in light of the political significance of emotional dismissal, in response, 1 suggest that feminist contentions of interpretation developed within dialogical communities are best suited to providing resources for expressing, interpreting, defining, and reflecting on our emotions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 20 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Analytic Feminism , Fall 2005 , pp. 27 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Elizabeth. 2004. Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2004), ed. Zalta, Edward. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2004/entries/feminism‐epistemology.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1985. Nicomachean ethics. Trans. Irwin, Terence. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1986. Trust and anti‐trust. Ethics 96 (January): 231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar On, Bat‐Ami. 1993. Marginality and epistemic privilege. In Feminist epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, Linda and Potter, Elizabeth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benson, Paul. 1994. Free agency and self worth. Journal of Philosophy 91 (12): 657–58.10.2307/2940760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1994. Moral perception and particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubeck, Diemut. 2000. Feminism in political philosophy: Women's difference. In The Cambridge companion to feminism in philosophy, ed. Fricker, Miranda and Hornsby, Jennifer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burrow, Sylvia. 2002. “Showing some Humean sympathy: The role of emotion in moral reasoning.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 1995. Standing for something. Journal of Philosophy 92 (5): 235–60.10.2307/2940917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 1994. Being dismissed: The politics of emotional expression. Hypatia 9 (3): 46–65.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00449.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 1997. Interpreting the personal. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
De Sousa, Ronald. 1987. The rationality of emotion. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5760.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DesAutels, Peggy. 1996. Gestalt shifts in moral perception. In Mind and morals, ed. May, Larry, Friedman, Marilyn, and Clark, Andy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Patricia. 1996. The verbally abusive reiarions/iip. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media Corporation.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality. Freedom, Calif.: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1993. Self‐trust, autonomy, and self‐esteem. Hypatia 8 (1): 99–120.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1993.tb00630.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister outsider. Freedom, Calif.: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona. 2002. Critical self‐reflection, self‐knowledge, and the emotions. Philosophical Explorations 5 (3): 186–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFall, Lynne. 1991. What's wrong with bitterness? In Feminist ethics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
McLeod, Carolyn. 2002. Self‐trust and reproductive autonomy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6157.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 1997. Emotion and heterodox moral perception. In Feminists rethink the self, ed. Tietjens Meyers, Diana. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 2003. Narrative and Moral Life. In Setting the moral compass, ed. Calhoun, Cheshire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Hilde Lindemann. 2001. Damaged identities, narrative repair. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, Justin. 2004. University ‘for sale’ on eBay. BBC News Online, March 1, 2004. http://news.bbc.co.Uk/l/hi/education/3522969.stm.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1980. Anger and the politics of naming. In Women and language in literature and society, ed. McConnell Ginet, Sally, Borker, Ruth, and Foreman, Nelly. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1989. Anger and insubordination. In Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy, ed. Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Thomas, Laurence. 1993. Moral deference. Philiosofacial Forum 24 (1‐3): 233–50.Google Scholar
Women's Health Test. 1995. Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario. In Health Canada, emotional abuse, http://www.hc‐sc.gc.ca/hppb/familyviolence/pdfs/emotion.pdf.Google Scholar