Skip to main content
Log in

Decision Modelling: An Objective Approach to Moral Reasoning

  • Published:
Teaching Business Ethics

Abstract

All agree that moral issues are difficult issues mired in philosophical, political, social, and spiritual values. It's no wonder that the process of calculating moral positions has been likened to ``eating broth with a fork.'' While insuring moral behavior is difficult, teaching moral reasoning, a noble act, is even more difficult – especially when confronted by students who, by nature or discipline, are essentially objectivists dependant upon a need to structure what most will agree defies structure. This paper suggests one way the use of decision modeling may reach to moral objectivists in a classroom setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Cavanagh, G. F., D. J. Moberg and M. Velasquez: 1981, 'The Ethics of Organizational Politics', Academy of Management Review 6(3), 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, 'A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing', Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herndon, N. C., Jr.: 1996, 'A New Context for Ethics Education Objectives in a College of Business: Ethical Decision-Making Models', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 501–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, 'Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model', Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maramark, S. and M. B. Maline: 1993, Academic Dishonesty and College Students. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Research, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Sommer, A. P. and A. Roshwalb: 1996, 'An Examination of the Relationship Between Ethical Behavior, Espoused Ethical Values and Financial Performance in the U.S. Defense Industry: 1988-1992' Journal of Business Ethics 15(12), 1249–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, N. S.: 1996, 'Deviant Managerial Behavior: costs, Outcomes and Prevention', Journal of Business Ethics 15(6), 703–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilby, S. M.: 1995, 'The Ethics of Academic Behavior: Will It Affect Professional Behavior?' Journal of Education for Business (November/December), 92–96.

  • Piper, T. R., M. C. Gentile and S. D. Parks: 1993, Can Ethics Be Taught? Perspectives, Challenges, and Approaches at Harvard Business School, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sifton, E.: 1998, 'The Serenity Prayer', Yale Review an 86(1), 16(50).

  • Steiner, G. A. and J. F. Steiner: 1994, Business, Government, and Society: A Managerial Perspective, McGraw-Hill.

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1996, 'Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model', Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. and K. A. Nelson: 1995, Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How To Do It Right, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cahn, S., Pastore, J.M. Decision Modelling: An Objective Approach to Moral Reasoning. Teaching Business Ethics 7, 329–340 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TEBE.0000005705.35440.3c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TEBE.0000005705.35440.3c

Keywords

Navigation