Abstract
This paper builds on London and Hart’s critique that Prahalad’s best-selling book prompted a unilateral effort to find a fortune at the bottom of the pyramid (BoP). Prahalad’s instrumental, firm-centered construction suggests, perhaps unintentionally, a buccaneering style of business enterprise devoted to capturing markets rather than enabling new socially entrepreneurial ventures for those otherwise trapped in conditions of extreme poverty. London and Hart reframe Prahalad’s insight into direct global business enterprise toward “creating a fortune with the base of the pyramid” (p. xi) rather than at the BoP. This shift in language requires a recalibration of strategic focus, we argue, and will necessitate implementation of “moral imagination” to formulate new mental models that can frame the possibility of local entrepreneurs working collaboratively and discursively with development partners drawn from civil society, corporate, and government sectors. Successful partnerships will arise from interactive processes of emergent, co-creative learning within a shared problem domain or “community of practice”. We call attention to three related pluralist framings of situated learning within such communities of practice: (1) decentered stakeholder networks; (2) global action networks; and (3) a focus on “faces and places” as a cognitive lens to humanize and locally situate diverse inhabitants within base of the pyramid partnership projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bajaj, V. (2011). Luster dims for a public microlender. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/11/business/global/11micro.html?. Accessed 5 Nov 2011.
Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics. New York: Public Affairs.
Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.
Bevan, D., & Werhane, P. H. (2011). Stakeholder theory. In M. Painter-Morland & R. ten Bos (Eds.), Business ethics and continental philosophy (pp. 37–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bornstein, D., & Davis, S. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: What everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press.
Calton, J. M. (2006). Social contracting in a pluralist process of moral sense making: A dialogic twist on the ISCT. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 329–346.
Calton, J., & Payne, S. (2003). Coping with paradox: Multi-stakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sense making process for coping with messy problems. Business & Society, 42, 7–42.
Chandavarkar, P. (2011). Indian microfinance industry mired in scandal. Accessed June 1, 2011, from http://dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,6405968.html.
Davidson, K. (2011). The importance of context in understanding csr: China’s labor conditions as a case study. Paper presented at the Vincentian Conference on business ethics, October 2011
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century. Capstone: Oxford University Press.
Elkington, J., & Hartigan, P. (2008). The power of unreasonable people: How social entrepreneurs create markets that change the world. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Freeman, R. E. (1984; 2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R. E., & Phillips R. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3), 331–350.
Gates, W. (2008). A new approach to capitalism in the 21st century. Davos, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/exec/billg/speeches/2008/01-24WEFDavos.mspx. Accessed 24 Jan 2009.
Hart, S. (2011). Taking the green leap to the base of the pyramid. In T. London & S. L. Hart (Eds.), Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid: New approaches for building mutual value (pp. 79–102). Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
Hartman, L., Werhane, P., Moberg, D., & Kelley, S. (2008). Alleviating global poverty through profitable partnerships: Moral imagination and economic well-being. The Melbourne Review, 4(2), 37–46.
Husk Power Systems. (2011). Accessed November 10, 2011, from www.huskpowersystems.com.
Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the art of learning together: A pioneering approach to communicating in business and in life. New York: Currency Press.
Kaeslin, D., Schmitt, R., & Calton, J. (2007). Decentered stakeholder theory: Toward a research agenda. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the international association for business & society, Florence, Italy.
London, T., & Hart, S. L. (Eds.). (2011). Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid: New approaches for building mutual value. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis & Cognition. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
McVea, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2005). A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 57–69.
O’Connell, L., Stephens, C., Betz, M., Shepherd, J., & Hendry, J. (2005). An organizational field approach to corporate rationality: The role of stakeholder activism. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 93–111.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183–203). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Booz Allen Hamilton.
Sachs, S., & Rühli, E. (2011). Stakeholders matter—A new paradigm for strategy in society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Simanis, E. (2011). Needs, needs everywhere, but not a BoP market to tap. In T. London & S. L. Hart (Eds.), Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid: New approaches for building mutual value (pp. 103–126). Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
Waddell, S. (2005). Societal learning and change: How governments, business and civil society are creating solutions to complex multi-stakeholder problems. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
Waddell, S. (2011). Global action networks: Creating our future together. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Waddock, S. (2006). Leading corporate citizens: Vision, values, value added (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7, 225–246.
Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision-making. New York: Oxford University Press.
Werhane, P. H. (2008). Mental models, moral imagination, and systems thinking in the age of globalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 463–474.
Werhane, P. H., Hartman, L. P., Moberg, D., & Kelly, S. (2010). Profitable partnerships for poverty alleviation. New york: Taylor & Francis.
Werhane, P. H. (2011). Globalization, mental models, and decentering stakeholder approaches. In R. Phillips (Ed.), Stakeholder theory (pp. 111–129). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Whitney, P. (2011). Reframing design for the base of the pyramid. In T. London & S. Hart (Eds.), Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid (pp. 165–192). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Wilber, K. (1996). A brief history of everything. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan Ltd.
Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2010). Building social business: The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. Philadelphia: Public Affairs.
Zadek, S. (2007). The civil corporation. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Acknowledgments
This paper has benefitted greatly from an anonymous reviewer’s comments and suggestions, and we are most grateful.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calton, J.M., Werhane, P.H., Hartman, L.P. et al. Building Partnerships to Create Social and Economic Value at the Base of the Global Development Pyramid. J Bus Ethics 117, 721–733 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1716-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1716-0