Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T05:56:39.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Controversies around a Universal Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Claude Albagli*
Affiliation:
Institut CEDIMES/University of Paris-XII

Abstract

Since Magellan's round-the-world voyage (1521), international issues have been embroiled in universalist claims. This paper investigates the controversial nature of a new economic universalism in the light of the social deficiencies and the limits of the available resources. The model of a global consumerism turns out to be inaccessible for billions of people. The market conceals a social dimension which ethics, equity, governance and identity are attempting to reintroduce. Consumerist universalism is faltering. The search for an alternative development model is crucial. It will need to be technically sustainable, socially more equitable, culturally more diverse and politically more participative.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albagli, C. (2001) Le Surplus agricole, De la puissance à la jouissance. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Amin, Samir (1986) La Déconnexion. Paris: La Découverte. English translation (1990) Delinking: towards a polycentric world. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Amin, Samir (1988) L'Accumulation à l'échelle mondiale. Paris: Economica. English translation (1974) Accumulation on a World Scale. New York, London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Arrous, J. (1999) Les Théories de la croisssance, Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. (1986) ‘Productivity Growth, Convergence and Welfare. What the long run Data Show?’, American Economic Review, 76, 5: 1072–85.Google Scholar
Bourg, D. and Rayssac, G.-L. (2006) Le Développement durable, maintenant ou jamais. Paris: Gallimard. Diamond, J. (2006) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Diaz Pedregal, V. (2007) Le Commerce équitable dans la France contemporaine: idéologies et pratiques. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Domar, E. (1946) ‘Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth and Employment’, Econometrica, 14: 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1994) ‘La gouvernementalité’, in Dits et écrits 1954-1988. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Friedman, T. (2006) The World is Flat, The Globalized World in the Twenty-First Century. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Furtado, C. (1954) ‘Capital Formation and Economic Development’, International Economic Papers, 4: 124–44.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (2006) Demain la décroissance. Entropie, écologie, économie. Paris: Le sang de la terre.Google Scholar
Harrod, R.F. (1939) ‘An Essay in Dynamic Theory’, Economic Journal, 49, 193: 1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hayek, F. (1982) Law, legislation and liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A.O. (1958) La Stratégie du développement économique. Paris: Editions ouvrières.Google Scholar
Hoselitz, B.F. (1965) Theories of Economic Growth. New York: Freedom Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. (2002) The Clash of Civilizations: the remaking of the world order. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Laïdi, Z. (2004) La Grande Perturbation. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Latouche, S. (2001) La Déraison de la raison économique, Du délire d'efficacité au principe de précaution. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Lewis, W.A. (1955) Theory of Economic Growth. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Meier, G. and Seers, D. (eds) (1984) Pioneers of Development. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, G. and Stiglitz, J. (eds) (2001) Frontiers of Development Economics. New York: Oxford University Press and World Bank.Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. (1994) Principles of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, L. (1963) Technics and Civilization. New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1957) Rich Lands and Poor. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Negreponti-Delivanis, M. (2002) La Mondialisation conspiratrice. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Nurkse, Ragnard (1953) Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Passet, R. (1979) L'Economique et le vivant. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Perroux, F. (1964) L'Economie du xxe siècle. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Platteau, J.-P. (1978) Les Economistes classiques et le sous-développement. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Prebisch, R. (1964) Towards a new trade policy for development. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Prebisch, R. (1984) ‘Five Stages in my Thinking on Development’, in Meier, G. and Seers, D. (eds) Pioneers in Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 175–91.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (2002) The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: Empiricus Books.Google Scholar
Rist, G. (1996) Le Développement, Histoire d'une croyance occidentale. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Rosenstein-Rodan, P.N. (1964) Capital Formation and Economic Development. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1998) ‘Pas de bonnes économies sans vraie démocratie’. Le Monde, 28 Oct.Google Scholar
Singer, H.W. (1984) ‘Industrialisation: Where Do We Stand? Where Are We Going?’, Industry and Development, 12.Google Scholar
Solow, R.M. (1957) ‘Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 39: 312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J.E. and Charlton, A. (2005) Fair Trade for All: how can we promote development? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar