Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T22:12:25.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Taking Seriously Dual Systems and Sex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

In response to Ann Ferguson and Claudia Card, I argue that Gayle Rubin's analysis of sex-gender systems supports the hypothesis that heterosexual domination is a distinctive axis of oppression. While gender domination places women in disad-vantaged positions, heterosexual domination displaces lesbians and gay men from society. In response to Chris Cuomo, I argue that same-sex desire is part of lesbians’ gender ambiguity; but I agree that nvy work has underemphasized sexual desire.

Type
Author Meets Critics Panel: APA Eastern Division Meeting, 1996
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Calhoun, Cheshire 1995. The gender closet: Lesbian disappearance under the sign ‘women.’ Feminist Studies 21(1): 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire 1996. Family's outlaws: Rethinking the connections between feminism, lesbianism and the family. In Feminism and Families, ed. Lindeman Nelson, Hilde. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne 1980. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signsv 5: 631–60.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle 1975. The traffic in women: Notes on the ‘political economy’ of sex. In Toward an anthropology of women, ed. Reiter, Rayna R.New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar