Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T22:57:48.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physicalism, Supervenience, and Dependence: A Reply to Botterell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Neil Campbell
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Interventions/Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antony, L. 1989Anomalous Monism and the Problem of Explanatory Force.” Philosophical Review, 98: 153–87.Google Scholar
Bilodeau, R. 1993L'Inertie du Mental.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 32: 507–24.Google Scholar
Botterell, A. 2002 "“Physicalism, Supervenience, and Dependence: A Reply to Campbell.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 41, 1: 155–61.Google Scholar
Campbell, N. 1997The Standard Objection to Anomalous Monism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 73, 3: 373–82.Google Scholar
Campbell, N. 1998Anomalous Monism and the Charge of Epiphenomenalism.” Dialectica, 52, 1:2339.Google Scholar
Campbell, N. 2000Supervenience and Psycho-Physical Dependence.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 39: 303–16.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1970 “Mental Events.” In Experience and Theory. Edited by Foster, L. and Swanson, J.. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Hess, P. 1981Actions, Reasons, and Humean Causes.” Analysis, 40: 7781.Google Scholar
Honderich, T. 1982The Argument for Anomalous Monism.” Analysis, 42: 5964.Google Scholar
Honderich, T. 1983Anomalous Monism: Reply to Smith.” Analysis, 43: 147–49.Google Scholar
Honderich, T. 1984Smith and the Champion of Mauve.” Analysis, 44: 8689.Google Scholar
Horgan, T. 1989Mental Quausation.” Philosophical Perspectives, 3: 4776.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1987‘Strong’ and ‘Global’ Supervenience Revisited.”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48: 315–26.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1990Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept.” Metaphilosophy, 21: 127.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1993a “Can Supervenience and ‘Non-Strict Laws’ Save Anomalous Monism?” In Mental Causation. Edited by Heil, J. and Mele, A.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1993b “Concepts of Supervenience.” In Supervenience and Mind. Edited by Kim, J.. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–76.Google Scholar
Klagge, J. 1990Davidson's Troubles with Supervenience.” Synthese, 85: 339–52.Google Scholar
Stoutland, F. 1980Oblique Causation and Reasons for Action.”Synthese, 43: 351–67.Google Scholar
Stoutland, F. 1985 “Davidson on Intentional Behavior.” In Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Lepore, E. and McLaughlin, B.. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar