Skip to main content
Log in

Truthmakers and necessary connections

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I examine the objection to truthmaker theory, forcibly made by David Lewis and endorsed by many, that it violates the Humean denial of necessary connections between distinct existences. In Sect. 1 I present the argument that acceptance of truthmakers commits us to necessary connections. In Sect. 2 I examine Lewis’ ‘Things-qua-truthmakers’ theory which attempts to give truthmakers without such a commitment, and find it wanting. In Sects. 3–5 I discuss various formulations of the denial of necessary connections and argue that each of them is either false or compatible with truthmaker theory. In Sect. 6 I show how the truthmaker theorist can resist the charge that they are committed to necessary exclusions between possible existents. I conclude that there is no good objection to truthmaker theory on the grounds that it violates the Humean dictum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong D.M. (1978). A theory of universals: Universals and scientific realism (Vol 2). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong D.M. (1989). Universals: An opinionated introduction. Westview Press, Boulder Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong D.M. (1997). A world of states of affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong D.M. (2004). Truth and truthmakers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin T. (1996). There might be nothing. Analysis 56, 231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black M. (1954). The identity of indiscernibles. In: Black M. (eds). Problems of analysis. Routledge and Kegan-Paul, London, pp. 80–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Divers J., Melia J. (2002). The analytic limit of genuine modal realism. Mind 111(441): 15–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine K. (1994). Essence and modality. Philosophical Perspectives 8, 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1991). Parts of classes. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1999). A world of truthmakers?. In: Lewis D. (eds). Papers in metaphysics and epistemology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (2001). Truthmaking and difference-making. Nous 35(4): 602–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (2003). Things qua truthmakers. In: Lillehammer H., Rodriguez-Pereyra G. (eds). Real metaphysics. Routledge, London, pp. 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D., Rosen G. (2003). Postscript to things qua truthmakers. In: Lillehammer H., Rodriguez-Pereyra G. (eds). Real metaphysics. Routledge, London, pp. 39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe E.J. (1998). The possibility of metaphysics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross Paul Cameron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cameron, R.P. Truthmakers and necessary connections. Synthese 161, 27–45 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9152-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9152-7

Keywords

Navigation