Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T00:10:14.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Medical Decision-making and the Right to Die after Cruzan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

Alexander Morgan Capron
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 19 , Issue 1-2 , Spring Summer 1991 , pp. 5 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health, 110 S. Ct. 2841, 2852 (1990). Indeed, an actual majority of the court—the four dissenters and Justice O'Connor in a separate concurrence—took the position that the constitution guarantees individuals freedom from interference with their choices about life-sustaining treatment. Since then, however, two of this group (Justices Brennan and Marshall) have left the court, and it is impossible to know how the Court would come down if it had to decide this issue, rather than merely assume the answer.Google Scholar
Id. at 2857. (O’Connor, J. concurring.)Google Scholar
It is notable that in denying Nancy Cruzan's parents the authority to direct cessation of her treatment, the Supreme Court of Missouri expressed the view that whenever life could be extended it should be, lest decisions be improperly based on “quality of life” judgments made by a surrogate decision-maker concerning a patient with nonlethal impairments. Cruzan v. Harmon, 760 S.W.2d 408 (Mo. 1988)(en banc).Google Scholar