Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer Reactions to CSR: A Brazilian Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, we evaluate the response of Brazilian consumers to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives accompanied by a price increase. We demonstrate that the extent to which Brazilian consumers perceive a company to be socially responsible (i.e., their CSR perceptions) is related to both the basic transactional outcome of purchase intentions as well as two relational outcomes: the likelihood to switch to a competitor and to complain about the CSR-based price increase. More interestingly, we find that these relationships are jointly mediated by the consumers’ perceptions of price fairness and feelings of personal satisfaction. Perhaps most interesting, we find that these mediating effects vary with consumer purchasing power; the mediating effect of price fairness on purchase intention is stronger for lower income than for higher income consumers, whereas the mediating effects of personal satisfaction on switching and complaining intentions are stronger for higher income than for lower income consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S. and S. G. West: 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interaction (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwitt, L. F. and T. D. Donley: 1997, ‘Retail Stores in Poor Urban Neighborhoods’, Journal of Consumer Affairs 31, 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C. and D. W. Gerbing: 1988, ‘Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach’, Psychological Bulletin 103, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J.: 1990, ‘Impure Altruism and Donations of Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving’, Economic Journal 100, 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araya, M.: 2006, ‘Exploring Terra Incognita: Non-Financial Reporting in Corporate Latin America’, Journal of corporate citizenship 21, 25-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.T. Kearney Inc.: 2006, Foreign Policy Globalization Index (A.T. Kearney Inc., Chicago, IL), www.atkearney.com/main.taf?p=5,4,1,127.

  • Auger, P., P. Burke, T. M. Devinney, and J. J. Louviere (2003) What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features? Journal of Business Ethics 42, 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P. and T. M. Devinney: 2003, ‘Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions’, Journal of Business Ethics 76(4), 361-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., M. Gopinath, and P. U. Nyer: 1999, ‘The Role of Emotions in Marketing’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(2), 184-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, K.: 1993, ‘Egoism’, in P. Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics(Blackwell, Oxford, UK), pp. 197-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny: 1986, ‘The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173-1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M. J., A. D. Miyazaki, and K. A. Taylor (2000) ‘The Influence of Cause- Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another?’. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28: 248-262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. and L. L. Shaw: 1991, ‘Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosaically Motives’, Psychological Inquiry 2(2), 107-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, W. O. and R. L. Oliver (1985) ‘The Role of Public and Private Complaining in Satisfaction with Problem Resolution’. Journal of Consumer Affairs 19 (2), 222-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechwati, N. N. and M. Morrin (2003) ‘Outraged Consumers: Getting Even at the Expense of Getting a Good Deal’. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(4), 440–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B. and S. Sen: 2003, ‘Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies’, Journal of Marketing 67, 76-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B. and S. Sen (2004) ‘Doing Better by Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives’. California Management Review 47(1): 9-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R., A. D. Hall, F. Momente, and F. Reggiani (2007) ‘What Corporate Social Responsibility Activities are Valued by the Market?’. Journal of Business Ethics 76, 189-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, J. G., D. J. Hill, and S. S. Tax: 1997, ‘The Effects of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Postcomplaint Behavior’, Journal of Retailing 73, 185-210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, L. E. and J. W. Alba: 2006, ‘Price Fairness: Good and Service Differences and the Role of Vendor Costs’, Journal of Consumer Research 33, 258-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, L. E., L. Warlop, and J. W. Alba: 2003, ‘Explorations in Price (Un)Fairness’, Journal of Consumer Research 29, 474-491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonus, H.: 1973, ‘Quasi-Engel Curves, Diffusion, and the Ownership of Major Consumer Durables’, Journal of Political Economy 81, 655-677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S. and S. Pavelin: 2004, ‘Building a Good Reputation’, European Management Journal 22(6):704-713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J. and P. A. Dacin: 1997, ‘The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses’, Journal of Marketing 61, 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. C.: 1999a, ‘Perceptions of Price Unfairness: Antecedents and Consequences’, Journal of Marketing Research 36(2), 187–199.

  • Campbell, M. C.: 1999b, ‘Why Did You Do That? The Important Role of Inferred Motive in Perceptions of Price Fairness,’ Pricing Strategy & Practice 8(2), 145–152.

  • Campbell, M. C.: 2007, ‘Says Who?! How the Source of Price Information and Affect Influence Perceived Price (Un) fairness’, Journal of Marketing Research 44, 261-271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chebat, J. C. and W. Slusarczyk (2005) How Emotions Mediate the Effects of Perceived Justice on Loyalty in Service Recovery Situations: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business Research 58(5): 664-673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken: 2003, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 3(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y. and P. E. Spector: 2001, ‘The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86, 278-321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, F. and R.Mathews (2001) The Myth of Excellence: Why Great Companies Never Try to Be the Best at Everything. Crown Business: New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creyer, E. H. and W. T. J. Ross (1997) ‘Trade-Offs between Price and Quality: How a Value Index Affects Preference Formation’. Journal of Consumer Affairs 31(2): 280-302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. and R. Thaler: 1998 ‘Cooperation’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 2(3), 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J. and S. Lewis (2003) ‘CSR in Stakeholder Expectations: And Their Implications for Company Strategy’. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2/3), 185-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Onis J (2008) Brazil’s Big Moment: A South American Giant Wakes Up. Foreign Affairs 87(6): 110-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F.: 1984, ‘Helping Behavior and Altruism: An Empirical and Conceptual Overview’, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology’ (Academic Press, New York, NY), pp. 361-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., C. B. Bhattacharya, and S. Sen (2007) ‘Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The role of Competitive Positioning’. International Journal of Research in Marketing 24(3), 224-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., R. Natarajan, and W.-Y. Huang: 2005, ‘Consumers’ Moral Philosophies: Identifying the Idealist and the Relativist’, Journal of Business Research 58, 1690-1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J.: 1998, Cannibals with forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (Capstone, Oxford, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P. S., D. J. Webb, and L. A. Mohr (2006) Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Program. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2): 147-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkes, V. S., S. Koletsky, and J. L. Graham: 1987, ‘A Field Study of Causal Inferences and Consumer Reaction: The View from the Airport’, Journal of Consumer Research 13, 534-539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and D. Larcker: 1981, ‘Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error’, Journal of Marketing Research 18(3), 39-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, S., K. B. Kerch, and H. R. Dodge: 1996, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Assessment of Individual Behavior in the Market Place’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 805-814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham: 2006, Multivariate Data Analysis 6(Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, P. A.: 2004, The Corporate Social Responsibility System in Latin America and the Caribbean FPP-04-1 (FOCAL – Canadian Foundation for the Americas, Ontario, Canada).

  • Hitt, M. A. and X. He (2008) Firm Strategies in a Changing Global Competitive Landscape. Business Horizons 51(5): 363-369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. B., J. A. Quelch, and E. L. Taylor: 2004, ‘How Global Brands Compete’, Harvard Business Review 82, 68-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., W. D. Hoyer, and N. Koschate (2005) Customers’ Reactions to Price Increases: Do Customer Satisfaction and Perceived Motive Fairness Matter?. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33 (1), 36-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsky, D.: 1990, ‘A Diffusion Model Incorporating Product Benefits, Price, Income and Information’, Marketing Science 9, 342-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hustad, T. P. and E. A. Pessemier: 1973, ‘Will the Real Consumer Activist Please Stand Up: An Examination of Consumers’ Opinions About Marketing Practices’, Journal of Marketing Research 10, 319-324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idowu, S. L. and W. L Filho (Eds.): 2009, The Global Practices of CSR (Springer Verlag: Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. and P. F. Levin: 1972, ‘The Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and Kindness’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21, 384-388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, L. F. and F. M. Bass: 1989, ‘Adjusting Stated Intention Measures to Predict Trial Purchase of New Products: A Comparison of Models and Methods’, Journal of Marketing Research 26, 336-345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and J. L. Knetsch: 1992, ‘Contingent Valuation and the Value of Public Goods’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22, 90–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger FN (1986) Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt Rinehart Winston: New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., C. M. Lockwood and J. Williams: 2004, ‘Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods’, Multivariate Behavioral Research 39, 99-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J. and S. Wartick (2003) Dealing with Stakeholders: How reputation, Credibility and Framing Influence the Game. Corporate Reputation Review 6(1): 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S.: 1995, ‘What Makes a Price Increase Seem ‘Fair’?’, Pricing Strategy and Practice 3, 21-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell S. (1999) The Social Norms of Discrete Consumer Exchange: Classification and Quantification. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 58(4): 999-1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, V.: 2006, ‘Percepções de Injustiça em Aumento de Preço de Serviços: Dependência do comprador, relevância do serviço, emoções e intenções de comportamento’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Instituto COPPEAD de Administração/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

  • McKinsey and Company: 2007, Shaping the New Rules of Competition: UN Global Compact Participant Mirror.

  • Mohr, L. A. and D. J. Webb (2005) The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consumer Responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs 39(1): 121-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morganosky, M. A. and H. M. Buckely: 1986, ‘Complaint Behavior: Analysis by Demographics, Lifestyle and Consumer Values’, in M. Wallendorf and P. Anderson (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research XIV (Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT), pp. 223–226.

  • Muncy, J. A. and F. A. Vitell: 1992, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of the Final Consumer’, Journal of Business Research 24, 297-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J. A. F. and Hayes: 2004, ‘SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models’, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36, 717-731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J. and A. F. Hayes: 2008, ‘Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models’, Behavior Research Methods 40 , 879-891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., D. D. Rucker, and A. F. Hayes: 2007, ‘Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions’, Multivariate Behavioral Research 42, 185-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezende, C. B.: 2008, ‘Stereotypes and National Identity: Experiencing the “Emotional Brazilian”‘, Identities, 15(1), 103-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E. and R. G. Lomax: 2004, A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiders, K., G. B. Voss, D. Grewal, and A. L. Godfrey: 2005, ‘Do Satisfied Customers Buy More? Examining Moderating Influences in a Retailing Context’, Journal of Marketing 69, 26-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. and C. B. Bhattacharya: 2001, ‘Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Marketing Research 38, 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpa, D. A. F.: 2006, ‘Efeitos da Responsabilidade Social Corporativa na Percepção do Consumidor sobre preço e valor: Um estudo experimental’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Instituto COPPEAD de Administração/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

  • Shugan, S. M.: 2004, ‘Endogeneity in Marketing Decision Models’, Marketing Science 23(1), 1-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siltaoja, M. E.: 2006, ‘Value Priorities as Combining Core Factors between CSR and Reputation-A Qualitative Study,’ Journal of Business Ethics 68, 91-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar, K. and S. P. Raj (1997) Quality Tier Competition: How Price Change Influences Brand Choice and Category Choice. Journal of Marketing 61(3): 71-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C.: 1996, ‘Ethics and the Typology of Customer Value’, in K. P. Corfman and J. G. Lynch Jr. (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research 23(Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT), pp. 148-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C. (2003) Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?. California Management Review 45(4): 52-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E.: 1982, ‘Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equations Models’, in S. Leinhart (ed.), Sociological methodology (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA), pp. 290-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E.: 1986, ‘Some New Results on Indirect Effects and Their Standard Errors in Covariance Structure Models’, in N. Tuma (ed.), Sociological Methodology (American Sociological Association, Washington, DC), pp. 159-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahilevitz, M.: 1999, ‘The Effects of Product Type and Donation Magnitude on Willingness to Pay More for a Charity-Linked Brand’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahilevitz, M. and J. G. Myers: 1998, ‘Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell,’ Journal of Consumer Research 24, 434-445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G. and L. S. Fidell: 2001, Using Multivariate Statistics 4(Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamayo, A.: 2007, ‘Hierarchy of Cross-Cultural and Brazilian Values’, Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 23 , 7-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamayo, A. and S. H. Shwartz: 1993, ‘Estrutura Motivacional dos Valores Humanos’, Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 9 , 328-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudel, R. and J. Cotte (2009) Does It Pay to Be Good?. MIT Sloan Management Review 50(2): 60-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyanathan, R. and P. Aggarwal: 2003, ‘Who Is the Fairest of Them All? An Attributional Approach to Price Fairness Perceptions’, Journal of Business Research 56, 453-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, K. L. and J. J. Inman: 2003, ‘Situational Price Sensitivity: The Role of Consumption Occasion, Social Context and Income’, Journal of Retailing 79, 199-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., H. Evanschitzky, and M. Wunderlich: 2008, ‘Customer Loyalty; Customer Satisfaction; Service Levels’, European Journal of Marketing 42(9/10), 977-1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., E. Berschield, and W. G. Walster: 1973, ‘New Directions in Equity Research’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25, 151-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warland, R. H., R. O. Herrmann, and J. Willis: 1975, ‘Dissatisfied Consumers: Who Gets Upset and Who Takes Action’, Journal of Consumer Affairs 9, 148-163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank: 2006, World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development, http://go.worldbank.org/UWYLBR43C0.

  • Xia, L., K. B. Monroe, and J. L. Cox: 2004, ‘The Price is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework of Price Fairness Perceptions’, Journal of Marketing 68(4), 1-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., L. L. Berry, and A. Parasuraman: 1996, ‘The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality’, Journal of Marketing 60, 31-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio W. Carvalho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carvalho, S.W., Sen, S., de Oliveira Mota, M. et al. Consumer Reactions to CSR: A Brazilian Perspective. J Bus Ethics 91 (Suppl 2), 291–310 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0620-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0620-0

Keywords

Navigation