Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:51:22.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pornography: An Uncivil Liberty?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Alisa L. Carse
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pornographic speech harms women by playing a key role in sustaining the social conditions through which women's liberty and equality are undercut. Though there is a principled moral and constitutional basis for pursuing a legal strategy in fighting pornography, we should not overestimate the effectiveness of the law or underestimate its potential dangers. The struggle against pornography must be waged through education, expressive exploration, and protest, not through the law.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 10 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminist Ethics and Social Policy, Part 1 , Winter 1995 , pp. 155 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The Attorney General's commission on pornography: Final report. 1986. United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Baier, Kurt. 1979. Response: The liberal approach to pornography. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 40(4): 619–25.Google Scholar
Barry, Kathleen. 1980. Beyond pornography: From defensive politics to creating a vision. In Take back the night: Women on pornography. See Lederer 1980.Google Scholar
Bart, Pauline B., and Jozsa, Margaret. 1980. Dirty books, dirty films, and dirty data. In Take back the night: Women on pornography. See Lederer 1980.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1984. Two concepts of liberty. In Liberalism and its critics, ed. Sandel, Michael. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Hugo. 1960. The bill of rights. New York University Law Review 35: 865ff.Google Scholar
Blakely, Mary Kay. 1985. Is one woman's sexuality another woman's pornography? Ms., April, 41–47, 120–22.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan. 1980. Excerpt on pornography from Against our will: Men, women and rape. In Take back the night: Women on pornography. See Lederer 1980.Google Scholar
Burstyn, Varda ed., 1985. Women against censorship. Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre.Google Scholar
Court, John H. 1984. Sex and violence: A ripple effect. In Pornography and sexual aggression. See Malamuth and Donnerstein 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, Richard, and Stefancic, Jean. 1993. Overcoming legal barriers to regulating hate speech on campuses. The Chronicle of Higher Education 39(49): B1–B3.Google Scholar
Diamond, Irene. 1980. Pornography and repression: A reconsideration of ‘who’ and ‘what.’ In Take back the night: Women on pornography. See Lederer 1980.Google Scholar
Donnerstein, Edward. 1984. Pornography: Its effect on violence against women. In Pornography and sexual aggression. See Malamuth and Donnerstein.Google Scholar
Donnerstein, Edward, and Hallam, John. 1978. Facilitating effects of erotica on aggression against women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(11): 1270–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnerstein, EdwardLinz, Daniel, and Penrod, Steven. 1987. The question of pornography: Research findings and policy implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Duggan, LisaGoldstein, Richard, and Hentoff, Nat. 1984. Forbidden fantasies. The Village Voice, 16 October, 1, 11–12, 14, 16–17, 22, 44.Google Scholar
Duggan, LisaHunter, Nan, and Vance, Carol S. 1985. False promises: Feminist antipornography legislation in the U.S. In Women against censorship. See Burstyn 1985.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1989. Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Penguin, Plume.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1993. Women and pornography. The New York Review of Books, 21 October, 36–42.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 1992. John Stuart Mill and the harm of pornography. Ethics 102(3): 534–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, Deirdre. 1980. The politics of porn: Can feminists walk the line? Mother Jones, April, 20.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1986. Offense to others. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Susan. 1980. Sadism and catharsis: The treatment is the disease. In Take back the night: Women on pornography. See Lederer 1980.Google Scholar
Griffin, Susan. 1982. Pornography and silence: Culture's revenge against nature. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kaminer, Wendy. 1980. Pornography and the First Amendment: Prior restraints and private action. In Take back the night: Women on pornography. See Lederer 1980.Google Scholar
Kappeler, Susanne. 1986. The pornography of representation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1990. Whose right? Ronald Dworkin, women, and pornographers. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19(4): 311–59.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1993. Speech acts and unspeakable acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs 22(4): 293–330.Google Scholar
Lederer, Laura ed., 1980. Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Linz, DanielDonnerstein, Edward, and Penrod, Steven. 1987. The findings and recommendations of the attorney general's commission on pornography: Do the psychological “facts” fit the political fury? American Psychologist (October): 946–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1980. Pornography, oppression, and freedom: A closer look. In Take back the night: Women on pornography. See Lederer 1980.Google Scholar
Lovelace, Linda, and McGrady, Michael. 1987. Ordeal. New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Lyall, Sarah. 1993. Canada's morals police: Serious books at risk? The New York Times, 13 December.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1993. Only words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Malamuth, Neil and Donnerstein, Edward eds., 1984. Pornography and sexual aggression. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Malamuth, NeilHaber, Scott, and Feshback, Seymour. 1980. Testing hypotheses regarding rape: Exposure to sexual violence, sexual difference, and the ‘normality’ of rapists. Journal of Research in Personality 14: 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J., Lawrence, Charles R. III, Delgado, Richard, and Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1992. Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the First Amendment. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
McCormack, Thelma. 1978. Machismo in media research: A critical review of research on violence and pornography. Social Problems 25(5): 544–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1859] 1978. On liberty. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Mulvey, E. P., and Haugaard, J. L. 1986. Report on the surgeon general's workshop on pornography and public health. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General.Google Scholar
Paglia, Camille. 1991. Sexual personae: Art and decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Parent, W. A. 1990. A second look at pornography and the subordination of women. The Journal of Philosophy 37(4): 205–11.Google Scholar
Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. 1979. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Politically correct sex, an editorial. 1986. Playboy, October, 67–68, 85.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1993. Obsession. The New Republic, 18 October, 21–32, 34–36.Google Scholar
Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. 1979. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle S. 1993. Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, ed. Abelov, Henry, Barale, Michele Aina, and Halperin, David. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, Diana E. H. 1980a. Pornography and the women's liberation movement. In Take back the night: Women on pornography. See Lederer 1980.Google Scholar
Russell, Diana E. H. 1980b. Pornography and violence: What does the new research say? In Take back the night: Women on pornography. See Lederer 1980.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1987. Causation theory and the causes of sexual violence. American Bar Foundation Research Journal (4): 737–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skipper, Robert. 1993. Mill and pornography. Ethics 103(4): 726–30.Google Scholar
Smith, Don. 1976. Sexual aggression in American pornography: the stereotype of rape. Paper presented at American Sociological Association. New York City.Google Scholar
Steinem, Gloria. 1986. Outrageous acts and everyday rebellions. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
Stoltenberg, John. 1990. Refusing to be a man: Essays on sex and justice. New York: Meridian.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1993. Democracy and the problem of free speech. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Vadas, Melinda. 1987. A first look at the pornography/civil rights ordinance: Could pornography be the subordination of women? The Journal of Philosophy 84(9): 487–511.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 1989. Feminism in the law: Theory, practice, and criticism. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 59–97.Google Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf and Bryant, Jennings eds., 1989. Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar