Abstract
This paper examines sustainable agriculture’s steady rise as a legitimate farm management system. In doing this, it offers an account of social change that centers on trust and its intersection with networks of knowledge. The argument to follow is informed by the works of Foucault and Latour but moves beyond this literature in important ways. Guided by and building upon earlier conceptual framework first forwarded by Carolan and Bell (2003, Environmental Values 12: 225–245), sustainable agriculture is examined through the lens of a “phenomenological challenge.” In doing this, analytic emphasis centers on the interpretative resources of everyday life and the artful act of practice – in other words, on “the local.” Research data involving Iowa farmers and agriculture professionals are examined to understand how social relations of trust and knowledge are contested and shaped within and between agricultural social networks and organizational configurations. All of this is meant to further our understanding of what “sustainable agriculture” is and is not, who it is, and how these boundaries change over time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen P., Sachs C. (1993) Sustainable agriculture in the United States: Engagements, silences, and possibilities for transformation. In: Allen P. (eds) Food for the Future: Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability. Wiley, New York, pp 67–91
Allen P., Van Dusen D., Lundy J., Gliessmam S. (1991). Integrating social, environmental, and economic issues in sustainable agriculture American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 6:34–39
Allen P., Kovach M. (2000). The capitalist composition of organic: The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture Agriculture and Human Values 16: 117–129
Anton-Dunn J. (1997). Certified Organic Production in the United States: Half a Decade of Growth. AgriSystems International, Wind Gap, Pennsylvania
Bell M. M. (2004). Farming For Us All: Practical Agriculture and the Cultivation of Sustainability. College Station, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press
Bird E. A. R., Bultena G. L., Gardner J. C. (1995). Planting the Future: Developing an Agriculture that Sustains Land and Community. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa
Bonanno A., Constance D., Hendrickson M. (1995). Global agro-food corporations and the state: The Ferruzzi case Rural Sociology 60: 274–296
Bourdieu P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
Callon M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation. In: Law J. (eds) Power, Action and Belief. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK, pp 196–229
Callon M., Latour B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do it. In: Knorr Cetina K., Cicourel A. (eds) Advances in Social Theory. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK, pp 25–54
Campbell D. (2001). Conviction seeking efficacy: Sustainable agriculture and the politics of co-optation Agriculture and Human Values 18: 353–363
Carolan, M. S. (2002). Trust and Sustainable Agriculture: The Construction and Application of an Integrative Theory. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Carolan M. S. (2004). Ontological politics: Mapping a complex environmental problem Environmental Values 13:497–522
Carolan M. S. (2005a). The discipline of nature: The homogenizing and constraining forces of anti-markets on the food chain Environmental Values 14:363–387
Carolan M. S. (2005b). Barriers to the adoption of sustainable agriculture on rented land: An examination of contesting social fields Rural Sociology 70:387–413
Carolan, M. S. (2006a). “Risk, trust and “the beyond” of the environment: A brief look at the recent case of mad cow disease in the United States.” Environmental Values, 15: 233–252
Carolan, M. S. (2006b). “Do you see what I see? Examining the epistemic barriers to sustainable agriculture.” Rural Sociology, 71(2): forthcoming
Carolan, M. S. (2006c). “Ecological representation in deliberation: The contribution of tactile spaces.” Environmental Politics, 15: 345–361
Carolan, M. S. (2006d). “Science, expertise, and the democratization of the decision-making process.” Society and Natural Resources, forthcoming
Carolan, M. S. (2006e). “Sustainable agriculture, science, and the co-production of ‚expert’ knowledge: The value of interactional expertise.” Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, forthcoming
Carolan M. S., Bell M. M. (2003). In truth we trust: Discourse, phenomenology and the social relations of knowledge Environmental Values 12:225–245
Carolan M. S., Bell M. M. (2004). No fence can stop it: Debating dioxin drift from a small US town to Arctic Canada. In: Harrison N., Bryner G. (eds) Science and Politics in the International Environment. Rowman and Littlefield, New York, pp 385–422
Carolan M. S., Mayerfeld D., Bell M., Exner R. (2004). Rented land: Barriers to sustainable agriculture Journal of Social and Water Conservation 59:70A–75A
Clark J., Murdock J. (1997). Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks: A reflection on three case studies Sociologia Ruralis 37:38–60
Collins H. H. (1990). Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Collins H. H., Pinch T. (1998) The Golem: What you Should Know about Science,(2nd edition). Cambridge University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
DeLind L. (1993). Market niches, cul de sacs and social context: Alternative systems of food production Culture and Agriculture 47:7–12
DeLind L. (1995). The state, hog hotels, and the ‚right to farm’: A curious relationship Agriculture and Human Values 12:34–44
DeLind L. (2000). Transforming organic agriculture into industrial organic products: Reconsidering national organic standards Human Organization 59:198–208
DeLind L. (2002). Place, work, and civic agriculture: Common fields for cultivation Agriculture and Human Values 19:217–224
Downs G. W., Mohr L. B., (1976). Conceptual issues in the study of innovations Administrative Science Quarterly 21:700–714
Feldman S., Welsh R. (1995). Feminist knowledge claims, local knowledge, and gender divisions of agricultural labor: Constructing a successor science Rural Sociology 60:23–43
Foucault M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Tavistock, London, UK
Foucault M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Mirth of the Prison. Vintage, New York
Friedmann H., McMichael P. (1989). Agriculture and the state system Sociologia Ruralis 29:93–117
Gambetta D. (1988). Mafia: The price of distrust. In: Gambetta D. (eds) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford UK, pp 158–175
Giddens A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Polity, Cambridge Massachusetts
Giddens A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford University, Stanford, California
Gilbert N. (1995) Researching Social Life. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California
Hardin R. (2001). Conceptions and explanations of trust. In: Cook K. (eds) Trust and Society. Russell Sage, New York, pp 3–39
Hardin R. (2002). Trust and Trustworthiness. Russell Sage, New York
Hassanein N. (1999) Changing the Way American Farms: Knowledge and Community in the Sustainable Agricultural Movement. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska
Heffernan, W. (1999). “Biotechnology and mature capitalism” Paper presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of The National Agricultural Biotechnology Council, Lincoln, Nebraska, June 6–8
Hendrickson M., Heffernan W. D. (2002). Opening spaces through relocalization: Locating potential resistance in the weaknesses of the global food system Sociologia Ruralis 42:347–369
Howard A. (1940) An Agricultural Testament. Oxford University, London, UK
Jasanoff S. (1987). Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science Social Studies of Science 17:195–230
Jasanoff S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Jasanoff S., Wynne B. (1998). Science and decision making. In: Rayner S., Malone E. L., (eds) Human Choice and Climate Change. Batelle, Columbus, Ohio, pp 1–87
Kirwan J. (2004). Alternative strategies in the UK agro-food system: Interrogating the alterity of farmers’ markets Sociologia Ruralis 44: 395–415
Kloppenburg J. Jr. (1988). First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology. Cambridge University, New York
Kloppenburg J. Jr. (1991). Social theory and de/reconstruction of agricultural science: For an alternative agriculture Rural Sociology 56:519–558
Kremer K. S., Carolan M., Gasteyer S., Tirmizi S. N., Korsching P. F., Peter G., Tong P. (2001). Evolution of an agricultural innovation: The N-Trak soil nitrogen test – adopt and discontinue, or reject? Technology and Society 23:93–108
Kuhn T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Latour B. (1987) Science in Action. Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
Latour B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Law J. (2002) Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
Lockie S. (2002). The invisible mouth: Mobilizing ‚the consumer’ in food production-consumption networks Sociologia Ruralis 42: 194–278
Lyson T. (2004). Civic Agriculture: Reconnecting Farm, Food, and Community. University Press of New England, New York
Mayerfeld D., Exner R., Smith M., Carolan M., Bell M. (2003). Considering sustainable agriculture on your rented land. Iowa State University Extension Publications, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
McMichael P. (1995). Agrarian and food relationships in the world economy. In: McMichael P. (eds) Food and Agrarian Orders. Praeger, London, UK, pp iv–x
Misztal B. A. (1996). Trust in Modern Societies. Polity, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Mol A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
Nerbonne J. F., Lentz R. (2003). Rooted in grass: Challenging patterns of knowledge exchange as a means of fostering social change in a southeast Minnesota farm community Agriculture and Human Values 20:65–78
Peters S. (1979). Organic farmers celebrate organic research: A sociology of population science. In: Nowotny H., Rose H. (eds) Counter-Movements in the Sciences. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp 145–171
van der Ploeg J. (1993). Potatoes and knowledge. In: Hobart M. (eds) An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance. Routledge, London, UK, pp. 209–227
Polanyi M. (1962). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Porter T. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
Rogers E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. The Free Press, New York, New York
Saldivar-Tanaka L., Krasny M. E. (2005). Culturing community development, neighborhood open space, and civic agriculture: The case of Latino community gardens in New York City Agriculture and Human Values 21: 399–412
Snow D. A., McAdam D. (2000). Identity work processes in the context of social movements: Clarifying the identity/movement nexus. In: Stryker S., Owens T., White R. (eds) Self, Identity and Social Movements. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp 41–67
Strang D., Soule S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills Annual Review of Sociology 24: 265–290
USDA (US Department of Agriculture) (2004). 2002 Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture
Wynne B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science Public Understanding of Science 1:281–304
Wynne B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-law knowledge divide. In: Lash S., Szerszynski B, Wynne B. (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. Sage, London UK, pp 44–83
Wynne, B., C. Waterton, and R. Grove-White (1993). Public Perceptions and the Nuclear Industry in West Cumbria. Report RT 94.3. Lancaster, UK: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Michael Bell, Diane Mayerfeld, and Rick Exner for their support in carrying out this research. Thanks also to Belinda Backous, the anonymous reviewers, and especially Laura DeLind, for reading numerous drafts and extensively commenting on each. Finally, I would like to thank Arthur Mol and Wageningen University for providing me with a generous fellowship during which time an earlier version of this paper was developed. This research was supported by a grant provided by the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Michael S. Carolanis an Assistant Professor of Sociology at Colorado State University. His areas of specialization included environmental sociology, sociology of science and knowledge, sociology of food systems and agriculture, and the sociology of risk. Some of his recent writings have focused on the theorizing of nature–society relations, epistemological issues related to agriculture (and sustainable agriculture in particular), and the processes by which knowledge claims are constructed and contested in response to environmental threats.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carolan, M.S. Social change and the adoption and adaptation of knowledge claims: Whose truth do you trust in regard to sustainable agriculture?. Agric Hum Values 23, 325–339 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9006-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9006-4