Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Escepticismo y facciones políticas en los ensayos de David Hume
Skepticism and political factions in David Hume's essays
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v72n10Supl.111013Palabras clave:
D. Hume, política, escepticismo, facciones (es)D. Hume, political essays, skepticism, factions (en)
Descargas
Este trabajo examina algunos ensayos políticos de David Hume para sostener que su estrategia escéptica de moderación de las facciones políticas no consiste solamente en el examen de los argumentos, de estas sino también en el despliegue de maniobras retóricas distintivamente escépticas. Con ellas, logra exponer los intereses reales que originan las posiciones partidistas y disolver las doctrinas mediante las cuales las facciones atraen a sus seguidores. La estrategia constituye una forma de acción política comprometida que se apoya en su ciencia de la naturaleza humana.
This paper examines some of David Hume's political essays to argue that his skeptical strategy of moderating political factions consists not only in examining their arguments, but also in the display of distinctively skeptical rhetorical maneuvers. Thanks to these maneuvers, Hume manages to expose the real interests that originate partisan positions and dissolve the doctrines by which the factions attract their followers. Hume's strategy of political moderation constitutes a form of committed political action that rests on his science of human nature.
Referencias
Ainslie, Donald. Hume’s True Scepticism. Oxford University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593866.001.0001
Baier, Annette. A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume’s Treatise. Harvard University Press, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020382
Calvo, Ángela. El carácter de la “verdadera” filosofía en David Hume. Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 2012.
Emerson, Roger. “Conjectural History and Scottish Philosophers.” Historical Papers/Communications historiques 19.1 (1984): 63-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/030918ar
Evnine, Simon. “Hume, Conjectural History, and the Uniformity of Human Nature.”Journal of the History of Philosophy 31.4 (1993): 589-606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1993.0073
Fogelin, Robert. Hume’s Skepticism in the Treatise of Human Nature. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.
Fols, Peter. Hume’s Skepticism: Pyrrhonian and Academic. Edimburgh University Press, 2020.
Forbes, Duncan. Hume’s Philosophical Politics. Cambridge University Press, 1975.
Garret, Don. Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 1997.
Grene, Marjorie. “Hume: Sceptic and Tory?” Journal of the History of Ideas 4 (1943): 334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2707258
González, Catalina. Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant. A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics. Springe, 2022.
Harris, James. Hume. An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033220
Hume, David. Essays. Moral, Political and Literary. 1889. Edited by Eugene F. Miller. Liberty Fund, 1987.
Hume, David. Tratado de la naturaleza humana. Traducido por Félix Duque. Tecnos, 1988.
Hume, David. Investigación sobre el conocimiento humano. Traducido por Jaime de Salas Ortueta. Editorial Alianza, 2001.
Hume, David. Ensayos morales, políticos y literarios. Traducido por Carlos Martín Ramírez. Trotta, 2011.
Immerwahr, John. “Hume on Tranquillizing the Passions.” Hume Studies 18.2 (1992): 293-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2011.0393
Kemp Smith, Norman. The Philosophy of David Hume. MacMillan, 1949.
Laursen, John Christian. The Politics of Skepticism in the Ancients, Montaigne, Hume and Kant. E. J. Brill, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246843
Livingston, Donald. Philosophical Melancholy and Delirium. Hume’s Pathology of Philosophy. Chicago University Press, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226519210.001.0001
Loeb, Louis. Stability and Justification in Hume’s Treatise. Oxford University Press, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195146581.001.0001
Marusic, Jennifer. “Dugald Stewart on Conjectural History and Human Nature.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 15 (2017): 261-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2017.0172
McArthur, Neil. David Hume’s Political Theory. Law, Commerce, and the Constitution of Government. University of Toronto Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442684263
McCormick, Miriam. “Hume’s Skeptical Politics.” Hume Studies 39.1 (2013): 77-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2013.0000
Mill, John Stuart. “Bentham.” Essays on Politics and Culture. Edited by Gertrude Himmelfarb. Doubleday, 1963.
Miller, David. Philosophy and Ideology in Hume’s Political Thought. Oxford University Press, 1981.
Moore, James. “Hume’s Political Science and the Classical Republican Tradition.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 10 (1977): 809-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900050903
Norton, David and Taylor, Jacqueline, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521859868
Owen, David. Hume’s Reason. Oxford University Press, 1999.
Phillips, Mark. Society and Sentiment. Genres of Historical Writing in Britain. 1740-1820. Princeton University Press, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823628
Popkin, Richard. “David Hume: su Pirronismo y su crítica al Pirronismo.” Cuadernos de Filosofía y Letras X1-4 (1989): 45-83.
Popkin, Richard. The High Road to Pyrrhonism. Edited by Richard Watson and James E. Force. Hackett, 1993.
Popkin, Richard. “David Hume and the Pyrrhonian Controversy.” David Hume: Critical Assessments. Vol. ii. Edited by Stanley Tweyman. Routledge, 1995. 147-160.
Popkin, Richard. The History of Scepticism. From Savoranola to Bayle. Oxford University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195107678.001.0001
Russell, Bertrand. “A Reply to My Critics.” The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell. Edited by Paul Schilpp. Northwestern University Press, 1944.
Sabl, Andrew. “David Hume: Skepticism in Politics?” Skepticism and Political Thought in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Edited by Johan Christensen Laursen.
University of Toronto Press, 2015. 149-176.
Santos, Juan Samuel. “Hume and Conjectural History.” The Journal of Scottish Philosophy 15.2 (2017): 157-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2017.0162
Singer, Ira. “Hume’s Extreme Skepticism in Treatise i iv 7.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25.4 (1995): 595-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1995.10717428
Stephen, Leslie. History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, 1876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14125-000
Stewart, Dugald. “Preface.” Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments and the Dissertation on the Origin of Languages. Edited by Henry G. Bohn. York Street; Covent Garden, 1795; 1853.
Stroud, Barry. Hume. Routledge, 1977.
Stroud, Barry. “Hume’s Skepticism: Natural Instincts and Philosophical Reflection.”Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: A Pan-American Dialogue. Edited by Richard
Popkin. Springer, 1996. 115-133.
Watkins, Margaret. The Philosophical Progress of Hume’s Essays. Cambridge University Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108653244
Cómo citar
MODERN-LANGUAGE-ASSOCIATION
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Los derechos son del autor(es), quien(es) puede re-publicar en parte o en su totalidad el documento ya publicado en la revista siempre y cuando se dé el debido reconocimiento a Ideas y Valores
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
De acuerdo con la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional. Se autoriza copiar, redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato, siempre y cuando se conceda el crédito a los autores de los textos y a Ideas y Valores como fuente de publicación original. No se permite el uso comercial de copia o distribución de contenidos, así como tampoco la adaptación, derivación o transformación alguna de estos sin la autorización previa de los autores y de la dirección de Ideas y Valores. Para mayor información sobre los términos de esta licencia puede consultar: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.
.jpg)
