Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:07:50.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Omitting types in incomplete theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Enrique Casanovas
Affiliation:
Dep. de Lògica, Hist. i Fil. de la Ciència, Universitat de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain, E-mail: casanova@cerber.mat.ub.es
Rafel Farré
Affiliation:
Dep. de Matemàtica Aplicada II, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Pau Gargallo, 5, 08028 Barcelona, Spain, E-mail: farre@ma2.upc.es

Abstract

We characterize omissibility of a type, or a family of types, in a countable theory in terms of non-existence of a certain tree of formulas. We extend results of L. Newelski on omitting < covK non-isolated types. As a consequence we prove that omissibility of a family of < covK types is equivalent to omissibility of each countable subfamily.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Newelski, Ludomir, Omitting types and the real line, this Journal, vol. 52 (1987), pp. 10201026.Google Scholar
[2]Newelski, Ludomir, Omitting types for stable ccc theories, this Journal, vol. 55 (1990), pp. 10371047.Google Scholar
[3]Shelah, Saharon, Classification theory, second ed., North Holland P.C., Amsterdam, 1990.Google Scholar
[4]Simmons, Harold, An omitting types theorem with an application to the construction of generic structures, Mathematica Scandinavica, vol. 33 (1973), pp. 4654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar