Abstract
The goal of this essay is to analyse the influence of Johann Bernhard Basedow and Rousseau on Kant’s cosmopolitanism and concept of cosmopolitan education. It argues that both Basedow and Kant defined cosmopolitan education as non-denominational moral formation or Bildung, encompassing—in different forms—a thin version of moral religion following the core tenets of Christianity. Kant’s encounter with Basedow and the Philanthropinum in Dessau helps to understand the development of Kant’s concept of cosmopolitanism and educational theory ‘in weltbürgerlicher Absicht’. Rousseau’s role is more complex: he clearly influenced Kant; he is usually considered a precursor of modern nationalism and national education; and recent studies have stressed the cosmopolitan dimension of his educational programme. I claim that the dilemma of education according to Rousseau is that one has to choose between education of homme or education of citoyen, and that there is no way to avoid or go beyond this stark alternative. Kant’s reinterpretation of Rousseau is favourable and creative and has found many followers up to the present, but is misleading, as he ignores the dilemma and imposes his own conception of cosmopolitanism, of cosmopolitan education and of (possible) progress in history on Rousseau while claiming that this was actually Rousseau’s message.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson-Gold, S. (2001). Unnecessary Evil. History and moral progress in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Basedow, J. B. (1768/1965). Vorstellung an Menschenfreunde und vermögende Männer über Schulen, Studien und ihren Einfluß in die öffentliche Wohlfahrt. In A. Reble (Ed.) Ausgewählte pädagogische Schriften. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
Basedow, J. B. (1771/1965). Das Methodenbuch für Väter und Mütter der Familien und Völker. In A. Reble (Ed.) Ausgewählte pädagogische Schriften (2nd ed). Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
Basedow, J. B. (1775). Für Cosmopoliten.Etwas zu lesen, zu denken und zu thun. Leipzig: Crufius.
Basedow, J. B. (1776). Erstes Stück des Philanthropischen Archivs. Dessau: Philantropische Buchhandlung Leipzig.
Basedow, J. B. (1777). Praktische Philosophie für alle Stände (2nd rev. ed). Dessau: Philantropische Buchhandlung Leipzig.
Basedow, J. B. (1785). Das Basedowsche Elementarwerk. Ein Vorrat der besten Erkenntnisse zum Lernen, Wiederholen und Nachdenken. In A. Reble (Ed.), Ausgewählte pädagogische Schriften (2nd ed.). Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
Basedow, J. B. (1965). Ausgewählte pädagogische Schriften. A. Reble (Ed.). Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
Bollnow, O. F. (1982). Die Pädagogik des Barock. In G. S. Seidel (Ed.), Orientierungen zum pädagogischen Handeln, Festschrift für Elfriede Höhn (pp. 9–33). Göttingen, Toronto, Zürich: Verlag für Psychologie, Hogrefe.
Brandt, R. (2009). Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant (2nd ed.). Hamburg: Meiner.
Brown, G. W. (2009). Grounding cosmopolitanism. From Kant to the idea of a cosmopolitan constitution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Busch, H. J., & Dierse, U. (1985). Patriot, Patriotismus. In: J. Ritter (Ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Vol. 7, 207–217.
Busch, H. J., & Horstmann, A. (1976). Kosmopolit, Kosmopolitismus. In: J. Ritter (Ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Vol. 4, 1155–1167.
Cassirer, E. (1939). In Rainer A. Bast (Ed.) Rousseau, Kant, Goethe. Hamburg: Meiner 1991.
Cavallar, G. (2005). Sphären und Grenzen der Freiheit: Dimensionen des Politischen in der Pädagogik. In L. Koch & C. Schönherr (Eds.), Kant–Pädagogik und Politik (pp. 61–79). Würzburg: Ergon.
Cavallar, G. (2011). Imperfect cosmopolis: Studies in the history of international legal theory and cosmopolitan ideas. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Cavallar, G. (2012a). Cosmopolitanisms in Kant’s philosophy. Ethics and Global Politics, 5, 95–118.
Cavallar, G. (2012b). Educating Émile: Jean-Jacques Rousseau on Cosmopolitanism. European Legacy, 17(4), 485–499.
Cheneval, F. (2002). Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Bedeutung. Über die Entstehung und die philosophischen Grundlagen des supranationalen und kosmopolitischen Denkens der Moderne. Basel: Schwabe.
Cladis, M. S. (2007). Public Vision–Private Lives. Rousseau, religion, and 21st-century democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dent, N. (2005). Rousseau. London and New York: Routledge.
Dieterich, K. (1847/2009). Kant und Rousseau. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing.
Ehlers, N. (2004). Der Widerspruch zwischen Mensch und Bürger bei Rousseau. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
Fetscher, I. (1980). Rousseaus politische Philosophie. Zur Geschichte des demokratischen Freiheitsbegriffs (3rd ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Firestone, C. L., & Palmquist, S. (Eds.). (2006). Kant and the new philosophy of religion. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Fischer, N., & Forschner, M. (Eds.). (2010). Die Gottesfrage in der Philosophie Immanuel Kants. Freiburg, Basel: Herder.
Forschner, M. (2010). Im Westen nichts Neues? Bemerkungen zu neuerer Rousseauliteratur. Philosophische Rundschau, 57, 14–32.
Förster, E. (2009). The hidden plan of nature. In A. Rorty & J. Schmidt (Eds.), Kant’s idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim. A critical guide (pp. 187–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geismann, G. (2009). Sittlichkeit–Religion–Geschichte. In Kant und kein Ende Band 1. Studien zur Moral-, Religions- und Geschichtsphilosophie (pp. 111–118). Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.
Guyer, P. (2009). The crooked timber of mankind. In A. Rorty & J. Schmidt (Eds.), Kant’s idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim. A critical guide (pp. 129–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Höffe, O. (Ed.). (2008). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Höffe, O. (Ed.). (2011). Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Kater, T. (1999). Politik, Recht, Geschichte. Zur Einheit der politischen Philosophie Immanuel Kants. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.
Kleingeld, P. (2006). Kant’s cosmopolitan patriotism. In S. Byrd & J. Hruschka (Eds.), Kant and law (pp. 473–490). Aldershot, Burlington: Ashgate.
Kleingeld, P. (2007). Kant’s second thoughts on race. The Philosophical Quarterly, 57, 573–592.
Kleingeld, P. (2009). Kant’s changing cosmopolitanism. In A. Rorty & J. Schmidt (Eds.), Kant’s idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim. A critical guide (pp. 171–186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kleingeld, P. (2012). Kant and cosmopolitanism: The philosophical ideal of world citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knippenberg, J. M. (1989). Moving beyond fear: Rousseau and Kant on cosmopolitan education. Journal of Politics, 51(4), 811–827.
Koch, L. (2003). Kants ethische Didaktik. Würzburg: Ergon.
Laursen, J. C. (2010). Basedow, Johann Bernhard (1724–90). In H. F. Klemme & M. Kuehn (Eds.), The dictionary of eighteenth-century German philosophers (Vol. 1). London and New York: Continuum.
Louden, R. B. (2000). Kant’s impure ethics. From rational beings to human beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Louden, R. B. (2007). The world we want. How and why the ideals of the enlightenment still elude us. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Louden, R. B. (2011). Kant’s human being: Essays on his theory of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Louden, R. B. (2012). ‘Not a slow reform, but a swift revolution‘: Kant and Basedow on the need to transform education. In K. Roth & C. Surprenant (Eds.), Kant and education: Interpretations and commentary (pp. 39–54). New York, London: Routledge.
Meiers, K. (1969). Der Religionsunterricht bei Johann Bernhard Basedow. Seine Bedeutung für die Gegenwart. Dissertation Saarbrücken.
Moran, K. A. (2009). Can Kant have an account of moral education? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(4), 471–484.
Moran, K. A. (2012). Community and progress in Kant’s moral philosophy. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.
Munzel, F. (1996). Reason’s practical idea of perpetual peace, human character, and the pedagogical function of the Republican constitution. Idealistic Studies, 26, 101–134.
Munzel, G. F. (1999). Kant’s conception of moral character. The ‘critical’ link of morality, anthropology, and reflective judgment. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Neuhouser, F. (2008). Rousseau’s theodicy of self-love. Evil, rationality, and the drive for recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Kant and stoic cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(1), 1–25.
Overhoff, J. (2000). Immanuel Kant, die philanthropische Pädagogik und die Erziehung zur religiösen Toleranz. In D. Emundts (Ed.), Immanuel Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung (pp. 133–147). Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Overhoff, J. (2004). Die Frühgeschichte des Philanthropismus (1715–1771). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Peltre, M. (1999). Kant et l’éducation. Un dialogue avec Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In M. Samuel-Scheyder & P. Alexandre (Eds.), La Pensée pédagogique. Enjeux, continuité et rupture en Europe du XVIe au XXe siècle. Berne: Haupt.
Quadrio, P. A. (2009). Kant and Rousseau on the critique of philosophical theology: The primacy of practical reason. Sophia, 48, 179–193.
Rehm, M. (2006). Bürgerliches Glaubensbekenntnis. Moral und Religion in Rousseaus politischer Philosophie. München: Wilhelm Fink.
Reich, K. (1936/2001). Rousseau und Kant. In M. Baum (Ed.), Gesammelte Schriften (pp. 147–165). Hamburg: Meiners.
Reisert, J. R. (2012). Kant and Rousseau on moral education. In K. Roth & C. Surprenant (Eds.), Kant and education: Interpretations and commentary (pp. 12–25). New York, London: Routledge.
Rorty, A. O., & Schmidt, J. (Eds.). (2009). Kant’s idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim. A critical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenblatt, H. (2008). Rousseau, the anticosmopolitan? Daedalus, 137(3), 59–69.
Rousseau, J. -J. (1761/1997). From of the social contract or essay about the form of a Republic (known as the Geneva manuscript). In V. Gourevitch (Ed.), The social contract and other later political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau, J. -J. (1762/1997). Of the social contract. In: V. Gourevitch (Ed.), The social contract and other later political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau, J. -J. (1762/2007). Emile. Teddington: Echo Library.
Rousseau, J. -J. (1763/1997). Letter to Usteri. In: V. Gourevitch (Ed.), The social contract and other later political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau, J. -J. (1772/1997). Considerations on the Government of Poland and on its projected Reformation. In: V. Gourevitch (Ed.), The social contract and other later political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schalowski, S. (2010). Erziehung, Selbstbestimmung und Zwang bei Immanuel Kant und Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Zwei Philosophen mit identischen Ideen?. Munich: GRIN Verlag.
Scuderi, P. (2012). Rousseau, Kant, and the pedagogy of deception. In K. Roth & C. Surprenant (Eds.), Kant and education: Interpretations and commentary (pp. 26–38). New York, London: Routledge.
Spaemann, R. (2008). Rousseau. Mensch oder Bürger. Das Dilemma der Moderne. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Stroud, S. R. (2005). Rhetoric and moral progress in Kant’s ethical community. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 38(4), 328–354.
Stroud, S. R. (2008). Ritual and performative force in Kant’s ethical community. In V. Rohden, et al. (Eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants (Vol. 4, pp. 143–155). Berlin, New York, NY: de Gruyter.
Weisskopf, T. (1970). Immanuel Kant und die Pädagogik. Beiträge zu einer Monographie. Zürich: Editio Academica.
Williams, A. T. (1907/2009). The concept of equality in the writings of Rousseau, Bentham, and Kant. Reprint. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing.
Wood, A. (1970/2009). Kant’s moral religion. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Wood, A. (2009). Kant’s fourth proposition: The unsociable sociability of human nature. In A. Rorty & J. Schmidt (Eds.), Kant’s idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim. A critical guide (pp. 112–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, A. W. (2011). Ethical community, church and scripture. In O. Höffe (Ed.) Religion (pp. 131–150).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cavallar, G. Sources of Kant’s Cosmopolitanism: Basedow, Rousseau, and Cosmopolitan Education. Stud Philos Educ 33, 369–389 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-013-9383-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-013-9383-2