Abstract
This study examines the relation between firms’ corporate philanthropic giving and their performance in three other social domains – employee relations, environmental issues, and product safety. Based on a sample of 384 U.S. companies and using data pooled from 1998 through 2000, we find that worse performers in the other social areas are both more likely to make charitable contributions and that the extent of their giving is larger than for better performers. Analyses of each separate area of social performance, however, indicate that the relation between giving and negative social performance (cited concerns) only holds for the environmental issues and product safety areas. We find no significant association between corporate philanthropy and employee relations concerns. In general, these findings suggest that corporate philanthropy may be more a tool of legitimization than a measure of corporate social responsibility.
References
Agle B. R., Mitchell R. K., Sonnenfeld J. A. (1999) Who Matters to CEO? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(3), 507–525
Ashford B. E., Gibbs D. W. (1990) The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194
Aupperle K. E., Carroll A. B., Hatfield J. D. (1985) An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–461
Bakan J. (2004) The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. New York: Free Press
Berman S. L., Wicks A. C., Kotha S., Jones T. M. (1999) Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488–506
Burt R. S. (1983) Corporate Profits and Co-Optation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy. New York: Academic Press
Carroll A. B. (1979) A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505
Carroll A. B. (1991) Corporate Social Performance Measurement: A Commentary on Methods for Evaluating an Elusive Construct. Research in corporate social performance and policy, 12(42), 385–401
Cascio W. F., Young C. E., Morris J. R. (1997) Financial Consequences of Employment Change Decisions in Major US Corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1175–1189
Cho, C. H. and D. M. Patten: 2007, ‹Environmental Disclosures as Tools of Legitimacy: A Research Note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32(7/8), 639–647
Cho C. H., Patten D. M., Roberts R. W. (2006) Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation Between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure. The Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 139–154
Clotfelter C. T. (1985) Federal Tax Policy and Charitable Giving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Corporate Giving Directory: 2003, Taft Group, Rockville, MD
Deegan C., Rankin M., Voght P. (2000) Firms’ Disclosure Reactions to Major Social Incidents: Australian Evidence. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 101–130
DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160
Directory of Corporate and Foundation Givers: 2000, Taft Group, Rockville, MD
Dowling J., Pfeffer J. (1975) Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136
Ernst and Ernst: 1976 et seq., Social Responsibility Disclosure (Ernst & Ersnt, Cleveland, OH)
Erusalimsky A., Gray R., Spence C. (2006) Towards a More Systematic Study of Stand-Alone Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: An Exploratory Pilot Study of UK Reporting. Social and Environmental Accounting Journal, 26(1), 12–19
Friedman, M.: 1962, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp.122–126
Global Reporting Initiative: 2006, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines v3.0. (GRI, Amsterdam)
Gray, R. and J. Bebbington: 2007, ‹Corporate Sustainability: Accountability and the Pursuit of the Impossible Dream’, in G. Atkinson, S. Dietz and E. Neumayer (eds.), Handbook of Sustainable Development (Edward Elgar Publishing, Chletenham, UK), pp. 376–394
Greening D. W., Turban D. B. (2000) Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business and Society, 39(3), 254–280
Griffin J. J., Mahon J. F. (1997) The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business and Society, 36(1), 5–31
Hempel J. and L. Gard: 2004, The Corporate Givers. Business Week (November 29), pp. 100–104
Hillman A. J, Keim G. D. (2001) Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139
KLD Research & Analytics, Inc.: 2003, KLD Rating Data: Inclusive Social Rating Criteria. Cambridge, MA
Lindblom, C. K.: 1994, The Implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure. Presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, NY
Meyer J. W., Rowan B. (1977) Institutional Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2), 340–363
McElroy K. M., Siegfried J. J. (1985) The Effect of Firm Size on Corporate Philanthropy. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 25, 18–24
McElroy K. M., Siegfried J. J. (1986) The Community Influence on Corporate Contributions. Public Finance Quarterly, 14, 394–414
Miles R. H. (1987) Managing the Corporate Social Environment: A Grounded Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Navarro P. (1988) Why Do Corporations Give to Charity? Journal of Business, 61, 65–93
Neu D., Warsame H., Pedwell K. (1998) Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282
Patten D. M. (1992) Intra-Industry Environmental Disclosures in Response to the Alaskan Oil Spill: A Note on Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 471–475
Patten D. M. (2002) The Relation Between Environmental Performance and Environmental Disclosure: A Research Note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763–773
Rehbein K., Waddock S., Graves S. (2004) Understanding Shareholder Activism: Which Corporations are Targeted? Business & Society, 43(3), 239–267
Roberts R. W. (1992) Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612
Ruf, B. M., K. Muralidhar and K. Paul: 1993, Eight Dimensions of Corporate and Social Performance: Determination of Relative Importance Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, pp. 326–330
Ruf B. M., Muralidhar K., Brown R. M., Janney J. J., Paul K. (2001) An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 143–156
Sayrs L. W. (1989) Pooled Time Series Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
Seifert B., Morris S. A., Bartkus B. R. (2003) Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 195–211
Sethi S. P. (1979) A Conceptual Framework for Environmental Analysis of Social Issues and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns. Academy of Management Review, 4, 63–74
Sharfman M. (1996) A Construct Validity Study of the KLD Social Performance Ratings Data. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 287–297
Shocker A. D., Sethi S. P. (1974) An Approach to Incorporating Social Preferences in Developing Corporate Action Strategies. In: Sethi S. P. (ed.), The Unstable Ground: Corporate Social Policy in a Dynamic Society (pp. 67–80). Los Angeles: Melville Publishing Company
Suchman M. C. (1995) Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610
Swanson D. L. (1995) Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review 20(1), 43–64
Szwajkowski E., Figlewicz R. E. (1999) Evaluating Corporate Performance: A Comparison of the Fortune Reputation Survey and the Socrates Social Rating Database. Journal of Management Issues, 11(2), 137–154
Useem M. (1988). Market and Institutional Factors in Corporate Charitable Contributions. California Management Review, 30(2), 77–88
Waddock S. A. (2003) Myths and Realities of Social Investing. Organization & Environment, 16(3), 369–380
Waddock S. A., Graves S. B. (1997a) The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319
Waddock S. A., Graves S. B. (1997b) Quality of Management and Quality of Stakeholder Relations: Are They Synonymous? Business & Society, 36(3), 250–279
Wartick S. L., Cochran P. (1985) The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review 10(4), 758–769
Wartick S. L., Mahon J. F. (1994) Toward a Substantive Definition of the Corporate Issue Construct: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Business and Society, 33, 293–311
Watts R., Zimmerman J. (1986) Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Webb, N. J.: 1992, Company Foundations and the Economics of Corporate Giving. Ph. D. Dissertation, Duke University
Webb, N. J. (1994) Tax and Government Policy Implications for Corporate Foundation Giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 41–67
Werbel J. D., Carter S. M. (2002) The CEO’s Influence on Corporate Foundation Giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 47–60
Williams R. J., Barrett J. D. (2000) Corporate Philanthropy, Criminal Activity, and Firm Reputation: Is There a Link? Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 341–350
Wood D. J. (1991) Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
C. Chen, J., Patten, D. & Roberts, R.W. Corporate Charitable Contributions: A Corporate Social Performance or Legitimacy Strategy?. J Bus Ethics 82, 131–144 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9567-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9567-1