Abstract
The relevance of inner speech for human psychology, especially for higher-order cognitive functions, is widely recognized. However, the study of the phenomenology of inner speech, that is, what it is like for a subject to experience internally speaking his/her voice, has received much less attention. This study explores the subjective experience of inner speech through empathy for pain paradigm. To this end, an experimental phenomenological method was implemented. Sixteen healthy subjects were exposed to videos of sportswomen/sportsmen having physical accidents practicing extreme sports. Immediately after the exposure to the stimuli, a phenomenological interview was conducted to gather data about bodily sensations, emotions, motivations, and inner speech of watching other people’s accidents. Participant’s inner speech expresses concern about the consequences the accident could generate to the sportswomen/sportsmen or about the participants themselves. Simultaneously, participants’ inner speech happened with negative emotional feelings, many sensations distributed throughout their bodies, and a felt knowledge coming from a meaningful but pre-reflective and pre-verbal bodily dimension. Our findings show that inner speech in empathy is not merely a psycholinguistic process or high-order cognitive function, but rather it is a complex experience that occurs deeply related to meaningful emotions, bodily sensations, and an implicit, somatically felt knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albertazzi, L. (2013). Handbook of experimental phenomenology: Visual perception of shape, space and appearance. Wiley, ISBN, 978-1-119-95468-2.
Albertazzi, L. (2019). Experimental phenomenology: What it is and what it is not. Synthese, 198(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02209-6
Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2014). More than one voice: Investigating the phenomenological properties of inner speech requires a variety of methods. Consciousness and Cognition, 24, 113–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.012
Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 931–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000021
Alderson-Day, B., Mitrenga, K., Wilkinson, S., McCarthy-Jones, S., & Fernyhough, C. (2018). The varieties of inner speech questionnaire–revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.001
ATLAS.ti. Version 9, ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. Qualitative data analysis.
Azevedo, T. M., Volchan, E., Imbiriba, L. A., Rodrigues, E. C., Oliveira, J. M., Oliveira, L. F., Lutterbach, L. G., & Vargas, C. D. (2005). A freezing-like posture to pictures of mutilation. Psychophysiology, 42(3), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00287.x
Bitbol, M., & Petitmengin, C. (2017). Neurophenomenology and the microphenomenological interview. The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, 2, 726–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119132363.ch51
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
Bühler, K. (1965). Theory of language: The representational function of language. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Carruthers, P., & Smith, P. (1996). Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, H. (1996). An introduction to Vygotsky. Routledge.
Emerson, M., & Miyake, A. (2003). The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00511-9
Englander, M., & Morley, J. (2021). Phenomenological psychology and qualitative research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09781-8
FeldmanHall, O., Dalgleish, T., Evans, D., & Mobbs, D. (2015). Empathic concern drives costly altruism. Neuroimage, 105, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.043
Focquaert, E., Braeckman, J., & Plateck, S. (2008). An evolutionary cognitive neuroscience perspective on human self-awareness and theory of mind. Philosophical Psychology, 21(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080701875156
Fossa, P. (2017a). The expressive dimension of inner speech. Psicología USP, 28, 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-656,420,160,118
Fossa, P. (2017b). Pleromatization, phyisiognomization and metaphoricity: A theoretical articulation of sense making processes of Valsiner, Werner and McNeill. Psicología USP, 28(1), 93–101.
Fossa, P. (2019). Lo representacional y lo expresivo: Dos funciones del lenguaje interior. Psicología: Teoría e Pesquisa, 35(7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e35316
Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2011). The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.1.01fro
Fuchs, T., & Schlimme, J. E. (2009). Embodiment and psychopathology: A phenomenological perspective. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22(6), 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283318e5c
Giorgi, A. (2021). The necessity of the epochē and reduction for a Husserlian phenomenological science of psychology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 52(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12,341,382
Giorgi, A., Giorgi, B., & Morley, J. (2017). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.).
Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds. The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford University Press.
Hagenaars, M. A., Stins, J. F., & Roelofs, K. (2012). Aversive life events enhance human freezing responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024211
Hagenaars, M. A., Roelofs, K., & Stins, J. F. (2014). Human freezing in response to affective films. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 27(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2013.809420
Hamilton, A. K., Pernía, D. M., Wilson, C. P., & Dell’Aquila, D. C. (2018). What makes metalheads happy? A phenomenological analysis of flow experiences in metal musicians. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(4), 537–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1416210
Heavey, C. L., & Hurlburt, R. T. (2008). The phenomena of inner experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 798–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.006
Hermans, H., & Hermans, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory. Cambridge University Press.
Hurlburt, R. T., & Heavey, C. L. (2018). Inner speaking as a pristine inner experience. In P. Langland-Hassan & A. Vicente (Eds.), Inner speech: Nature, functions, and pathology (pp. 168–198).
Hurlburt, R. T., Heavey, C. L., & Kelsey, J. M. (2013). Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1477–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.003
Kim, H., & Han, S. (2018). Does personal distress enhance empathic interaction or block it? Personality And Individual Differences, 124, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.005
Langland-Hassan, P. (2021). Inner speech. WIREs Cognitive science, 12(2), e1544. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1544
Langland-Hassan, P., & Vicente, A. (2018). Inner speech: New voices. Oxford University Press.
Larraín, A., & Haye, A. (2012). The discursive nature of inner speech. Theory & Psychology, 22(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311423864
Lidstone, J., Meins, E., & Fernyhough, C. (2010). The roles of private speech and inner speech in planning during middle childhood: Evidence from a dual task paradigm. Journal Of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(4), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.002
Marková, I. (2006). On ‘The Inner Alter’ in dialogue. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 1(1), 125–147.
Martínez-Manrique, F., & Vicente, A. (2015). The activity view of inner speech. Frontiers In Psychology, 6(232), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00232
Martínez-Pernía, D. (2020). Experiential neurorehabilitation: A neurological therapy based on the enactive paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(924), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00924
Martínez-Pernía, D. (2022). The Experimental Phenomenological Method: A Scientific Approach Closer to the 5E Approach. Constructivist Foundations, 17(2), 148–150.
Martínez-Pernía, D., Cea, I., & Kaltwasser, A. (2021). Recovering the phenomenological and intersubjective nature of mindfulness through the enactive approach. In R. Arístegui, J. García-Campayo, & P. Barriga (Eds.), Relational Mindfulness: Fundamental and applications (pp. 65–89). Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-57732-2.
McCafferty, S. (2004). Space for cognition: Gesture and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.0057m.x
McCarthy-Jones, S., & Fernyhough, C. (2011). The varieties of inner speech: Links between quality of inner speech and psychopathological variables in a sample of young adults. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1586–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.005
McGann, M., de Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2013). Enaction and psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032935
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2003). Mindreading: An integrated account of pretense, self-awareness and understanding other minds. Oxford University Press.
Olivares, F. A., Vargas, E., Fuentes, C., Martínez-Pernía, D., & Canales-Johnson, A. (2015). Neurophenomenology revisited: Second-person methods for the study of human consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(673), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00673
Perry, A., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2013). Understanding emotional and cognitive empathy: A neuropsychological perspective. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & M. V. Lombardo (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience (pp. 178–194). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692972.003.0011
Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5(3–4), 229–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-006-9022-2
Petitmengin, C. (2007). Towards the source of thoughts: The gestural and transmodal dimension of lived experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14(3), 54–82.
Petitmengin, C., Remillieux, A., & Valenzuela-Moguillansky, C. (2019). Discovering the structures of lived experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 691–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9597-4
Philippi, C., & Koenigs, M. (2014). The neuropsychology of self-reflection in psychiatric illness. Journal Of Psychiatric Research, 54, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.004
Sacks, O. (2011). Seeing Voices. Knopf Canada.
Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534
Sokolowski, R. (2008). Phenomenology of the human person. Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press.
Thompson, E., & Varela, F. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(10), 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2
Thompson, E., Lutz, A., & Cosmelli, D. (2005). Neurophenomenology: An introduction for neurophilosophers. In Cognition and the brain: The philosophy and neuroscience movement. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610608.003
Tullett, A., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). The voice of self-control: Blocking the inner voice increases impulsive responding. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.008
Varela, F. (1984). Living ways of sense-making: A middle path for neuroscience. Order and disorder: Proceedings of the Stanford international symposium, 208–224.
Varela, F. (1991). Organism: A meshwork of selfless selves. In Organism and the origins of self (pp. 79–107). Springer.
Varela, F. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330–349.
Varela, F. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 34(1), 72–87.
Varela, F., & Shear, J. (1999). The view from within: First-person approaches to the study of consciousness. Imprint Academic.
Varela, F., & Thompson, E. (2003). Neural synchrony and the unity of mind: A neurophenomenological perspective. In A. Cleeremans (Ed.), The Unity of Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
Voloshinov, V. N., & Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (revised edition). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Wiley, N. (2016). Inner speech and the dialogical self. Temple University Press.
Williams, D., & Jarrold, C. (2010). Brief report: Predicting inner speech use amongst children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): The roles of verbal ability and cognitive profile. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(7), 907–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0936-8
Williams, D., Bowler, D., & Jarrold, C. (2012). Inner speech is used to mediate short-term memory, but not planning, among intellectually high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 24(1), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579411000794
Winsler, A., Fernyhough, C., & Montero, I. (2009). Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation (pp. 201–223). Cambridge University Press.
Zurina, H., & Williams, J. (2011). Gesturing for oneself. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9294-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vergara, M., Cea, I., Calderón, J., Troncoso, A., Martínez-Pernía, D. (2022). An Experimental Phenomenological Approach to the Study of Inner Speech in Empathy: Bodily Sensations, Emotions, and Felt Knowledge as the Experiential Context of Inner Spoken Voices. In: Fossa, P. (eds) New Perspectives on Inner Speech. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06847-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06847-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06846-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06847-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)