Notes
I wish to thank Lawrence Busch for introducing me to this distinction.
References
Benveniste, E. (1969). Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. Tome 2: Pouvoir, droit, religion. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1991). De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.
Breviglieri, M. (2012). L’espace habité que réclame l’assurance intime de pouvoir. Études Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, 3(1), 34–52.
Centemeri, L. (2014). Reframing problems of incommensurability in environmental conflicts through pragmatic sociology. Environmental Values. http://www.erica.demon.co.uk/EV/papers/Centemeri.pdf.
Chang, R. (Ed.). (1997). Incommensurability, incomparability and practical reason. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
Cheyns, E. (2014). Making “minority voices” heard in transnational roundtables: The role of local NGOs in reintroducing justice and attachments. Agriculture and Human Values,. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9505-7.
Crease, R. P. (2011). World in the balance: The historic quest for an absolute system of measurement. New York: W.W. Norton.
Desrosières, A. (1992). Discuter l’indiscutable. Raison statistique et espace public. In A. Cottereau & P. Ladrière (Eds.), Pouvoir et légitimité: figures de l’espace public (pp. 131–154). Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS.
Espeland, W. N. (2011). One singular sensation. Contribution to the review symposium on Lucien Karpik, Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2010. Socio-Economic Review,. doi:10.1093/ser/mwr010.
Harcourt, W. (2013). The future of capitalism: A consideration of alternatives. Cambridge Journal of Economics,. doi:10.1093/cje/bet048.
Heuts, F., & Mol, A. (2013). What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in practice. Valuation Studies, 1(2), 125–146.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
Karpik, L. (2007). L’économie des singularités. Paris: Gallimard.
Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 201–221.
Laugier, S. (Ed.). (2012). Tous vulnérables ? Le care, les animaux et l’environnement. Paris: Payot.
Law, J., & Mol, A. (Eds.). (2002). Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2001). The fragility of Goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage.
Salais, R., Baverez, N., & Reynaud, B. (1986). L’invention du chômage. Paris: PUF.
Silva-Castañeda, L. (2012). A forest of evidence: Third-party certification and multiple forms of proof. A case study of oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Agriculture and Human Values, 29(3), 361–370.
Thévenot, L. (2001). Organized complexity. Conventions of coordination and the composition of economic arrangements. European Journal of Social Theory, 4(4), 405–425.
Thévenot, L. (2007). The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements: Moving between the familiar and the public. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 413–427.
Thévenot, L. (2009). Governing life by standards. A view from engagements. Social Studies of Science, 39(5), 793–813.
Thévenot, L., Moody, M., & Lafaye, C. (2000). Forms of valuing nature: Arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In M. Lamont & L. Thévenot (Eds.), Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States (pp. 229–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vatin, F. (2013a). Valuation as evaluating and valorizing. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 31–50.
Vatin, F. (Ed.). (2013b). Évaluer et valoriser. Une sociologie économique de la mesure (nouvelle édition revue et augmentée). Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Centemeri, L. François Vatin (Ed.): Évaluer et valoriser: une sociologie économique de la mesure (nouvelle édition revue et augmentée). Hum Stud 38, 179–184 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9336-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9336-y