Skip to main content
Log in

Electronic Monitoring and Privacy Issues in Business-Marketing: The Ethics of the DoubleClick Experience

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper examines the ethics of electronic monitoring for advertising purposes and the implications for Internet user privacy using as a backdrop DoubleClick Inc’s recent controversy over matching previously anonymous user profiles with personally identifiable information. It explores various ethical theories that are applicable to understand privacy issues in electronic monitoring. It is argued that, despite the fact that electronic monitoring always constitutes an invasion of privacy, it can still be ethically justified on both Utilitarian and Kantian grounds. From a Utilitarian perspective the emphasis must be on minimizing potential harms. From a Kantian perspective the emphasis must be on giving users complete information so that they can make informed decisions as to whether they are willing to be monitored. Considering the Internet advertising industry’s current actions, computer users and government regulators would be well advised, both practically and ethically, to move to a user control model in electronic monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alder, G. S.: 1998,‘Ethical Issues in ElectronicPerformance Monitoring: A Consideration ofDeontological and Teleological Perspectives’Journal of Business Ethics 17(7) (May), 729–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, M.: 2000,‘Privacy’ Ethics and the Conductof Business, 3rd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Saddle RiverNew Jersey), pp. 159–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver, C., J. Moor, W. Duerfeldt, M. Kapp andM. Sullivan: 1994,‘Privacy’ Professional Ethics3(3 & 4), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, H.: 1999,‘Privacy Online – The FTC MustAct Now’ Business Week, No. 3657 (Nov. 29), 48.

  • Introna, L. and A. Pouloudi: 1999,‘Privacy in theInformation Age: Stakeholders, Interests andValues’ The Journal of Business Ethics 22(1), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, H.: 1980,‘Privacy and the Right toPrivacy’ Philosophy 55(211), 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, J.: 2000,‘U.S. West, Inc. v. FCC’ BerkeleyTechnology Law Journal 15, 353.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘I-034: Internet Cookies’ U.S. Department of EnergyComputer Incident Advisory Capability. 1998.<http://ciac.IInI.gov/ciac/bulletins/i-034.shtm>(March 1, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘IAB Privacy Guidelines’ Internet AdvertisingBureau. 2000. <http//www.iab.net/privacy guidelines/htm> (August 7, 2000).University of Waterloo School of Accountancy,200 University Avenue West,Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1,Hagey Hall, Room 155,Canada254 Darren Charters

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charters, D. Electronic Monitoring and Privacy Issues in Business-Marketing: The Ethics of the DoubleClick Experience. Journal of Business Ethics 35, 243–254 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013824909970

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013824909970

Navigation