Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Linearization-based word-part ellipsis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses a phenomenon in which certain word-parts can be omitted. The evidence shows that the full range of data cannot be captured by a sublexical analysis, since the phenomena can be observed both in phrasal and in lexical environments. It is argued that a form of deletion is involved, and that the phenomena—lexical or otherwise—are subject to the same phonological, semantic, and syntactic constraints. In the formalization that is proposed, all of the above constraints are cast in a parallel and declarative fashion, in the framework of Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (Pollard and Sag Head-driven phrase structure grammar, 1994), since the various levels of linguistic description are locally and simultaneously available. Building on recent accounts of ellipsis, this paper proposes a unified and general account of word-part ellipsis and phrasal ellipsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott B. (1976) Right node raising as a test for constituenthood. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 639–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsina, A. (1990). Predicate composition: A theory of syntactic function alternations. PhD thesis, Stanford University.

  • Anderson S. (1992) A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Artstein, R. (2002). Coordination of word parts: A surface level account. In G. Katz, S. Reinhard, & P. Reuter (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Gesellschaft für Semantik (pp. 1–15). University of Osnabrück.

  • Artstein R. (2005) Coordination of parts of words. Lingua 115(4): 359–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby W. (1977) Clitic inflection in French: An historical perspective. Rodopi, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. (1998). When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? English Language Linguistics, 2, 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavers, J., & Sag, I. A. (2004). Ellipsis and apparent non-constituent coordination. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (pp. 48–69). Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/HPSG/5/.

  • Booij G. (1985) Coordination reduction in complex words: A case for prosodic phonology. In: van der Hulst H., Smith N. (eds) Advances in nonlinear phonology, Vol. 7 of linguistic models. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 143–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij G.E. (2005) Compounding and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. In: Dressler W.U., Kastovsky D., Pfeiffer O.E., Rainer F. (eds) Morphology and its demarcations, Number 264 in current issues in linguistic theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp 109–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan J. (1974) On the position of certain clause-particles in phrase structure. Linguistic Inquiry 5: 614–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan J., Mchombo S.A. (1995) The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13: 181–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, R. P. (2007). Coordinate structures—Constraint-based syntax-semantics processing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lisbon.

  • Chaves, R. P., & Sag, I. A. (2007). Two kinds of ellipsis in English coordinate structures. Under review for journal publication.

  • Chomsky N. (1970) Remarks on nominalization. In: Jacobs A., Rosenbaum P. (eds) Readings in transformational grammar. Ginn and Co, Waltham (MA), pp 184–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Copestake A., Flickinger D., Sag I.A., Pollard C. (2006) Minimal recursion semantics: An introduction. Journal Research on Language & Computation 3(4): 281–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crysmann, B. (2002). Constraint-based coanalysis—Portuguese cliticisation and morphology-syntax interaction in HPSG. PhD Thesis, Saarland University.

  • Crysmann, B. (2003). An asymmetric theory of peripheral sharing in HPSG. In G. Jäger, P. Monachesi, G. Penn, & S. Wintner (Eds.), Proceedings of Formal Grammar 2003 (pp. 47–62). Vienna, Austria: ESSLLI 2003.

  • Di Sciullo A.M., Williams E. (1987) On the definition of word. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, C., & Sag, I. A. (1999). Domains in Warlpiri. In Sixth International Conference on HPSGAbstract (pp. 101–106). University of Edinburgh.

  • Dowty D.R. (1988) Type-raising, functional composition, and nonconstituent coordination. In: Richard Oehrle E.B., Wheeler D. (eds) Categorial grammars and natural language structures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 153–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Féry C., Hartmann K. (2005) The focus and prosodic structures of German gapping and right node raising. The Linguistic Review 22: 69–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman L.R. (1965) Coordinating conjunctions in English. Language 41: 260–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall G. (1987) Parallel structures in syntax: Coordination, causatives, and restructuring. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevisse, M. (1986 [1936]). Le Bon usage. Gembloux: Duculot. Revised by André Goosse.

  • Gundel, J. (2003). Information structure and referential givenness/newness: How much belongs in the grammar? In S. Mü ller (Ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG-2003 Conference, Michigan State University, East Lansing (pp. 122–142). Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications. stanford.edu/HPSG/4.

  • Haji-Abdolhosseini, M. (2003). A constraint-based approach to information structure and prosody correspondence. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG-2003 Conference, Michigan State University, East Lansing (pp. 143–162). Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications. stanford.edu/HPSG/4/.

  • Hankamer J. (1973) Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann K. (2000) Right node raising and gapping: Interface conditions on prosodic deletion. John Benjamins, Philadelphia/Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes B. (1989) The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In: Kiparsky P., Youmans G. (eds) Rythm and meter. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 201–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle T. (1991) On reconstruction and coordination. In: Haider H., Netter K. (eds) Representation and derivation in the theory of grammar, studies in natural language and linguistic theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 139–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, P. J., & Traugott E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.

  • Horn L. (2002) Ellipsis and discourse coherence. Sophia Linguistica 49: 1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn L. et al (2005) An un-paper for the unsyntactician. In: Ufwene S.M. (eds) Polymorphous linguistics: Jim McCawley’s legacy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 329–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston R.D., Payne J., Peterson P. (2002) Coordination and supplementation. In: Huddleston R.D., Pullum G. K. (eds) The Cambridge grammar of the English language, Chap 15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1273–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson R. (1976) Conjunction reduction, gapping, and right-node-raising. Language 52: 535–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingria, R. J. P. (1990). The limits of unification. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 194–204). Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Inkelas S., Zec D. (1990) Prosodically constrained syntax. In: Inkelas S., Zec D. (eds) The phonology-syntax connection. University of Chicago Press, Stanford: CSLI & Chicago, Cambridge, pp 365–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff R. (1977) X-Syntax: A study of phrase structure. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen J. (1998) Coordination. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathol, A. (1995). Linearization-based German syntax. PhD Thesis, Ohio State University.

  • Kathol A. (2000) Linear syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne R. (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig J.-P. (1999) Lexical relations. CSLI Publications, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger H.-U., Nerbonne J. (1993) Feature-based inheritance networks for computational lexicons. In: Briscoe T., Paiva V., Copestake A. (eds) Inheritance, defaults and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 90–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, J. (1996). An underspecified HPSG representation for information structure. In J. Tsuji (Ed.), Proceedings of Coling-96. 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING96). Copenhagen, Denmark, August 5–9, 1996 (pp. 670–675). Association for Computational Linguistics, Somerst, New Jersey.

  • Lapointe, S. (1997). A lexical analysis of the English auxiliary verb system. In GLOT (pp. 2, 215–254).

  • Levine R. (1985) Right node (non-)raising. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 492–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine R.D. (2001) The extraction riddle: Just what are we missing?. Journal of Linguistics 37: 145–174

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley J.D. (1987) Some additional evidence for discontinuity. In: Huck G.J., Ojeda A.E. (eds) Syntax and semantics 20: Discontinuous constituency. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp 185–200

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley J.D. (1988) The syntactic phenomena of English (2 ed). University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, D. (1990). Coordination in an axiomatic grammar. In COLING, (pp. 207–212). August 20–25, Helsinki, Finland.

  • Müller W. (1990) Die real existierenden grammatischen Ellipsen und die Norm. Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Sprachwissenschaft 15: 241–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Neijt A. (1979) Gapping. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Nespor M. (1985) The phonological word in Italian. In: van der Hulst H., Smith N. (eds) Advances in nonlinear phonology. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp 193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Nespor M., Vogel I. (1986) Prosodic phonology. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg G., Wasow T., Sag I.A. (1994) Idioms. Language 70(3): 491–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orgun, C. O. (1996). Sign-based morphology and phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Pollard C., Sag I.A. (1987) Information-based syntax and semantics; volume one fundamentals. CSLI Lecture Notes No. 13. CSLI Publications, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; Stanford: CSLI.

  • Pollard, C. J., Kasper, R. T., & Levine, R. D. (1994). Studies in constituent ordering: Toward a theory of linearization. In Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Research Proposal to the National Science Foundation.

  • Postal P.M. (1974) On raising. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal P.M. (1994) Parasitic and pseudoparasitic gaps. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 63–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal P.M. (1998) Three investigations of extraction. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum G.K., Zwicky A.M. (1986) Phonological resolution of syntactic feature conflict. Language 72: 751–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman, Harcourt

    Google Scholar 

  • Reape M. (1994) Domain union and word order variation in German. In: Nerbonne J., Netter K., Pollard C. J. (eds) German in head-driven phrase structure grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes, number 46. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 151–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, S. (2001). Deverbale Komposita an der Morphologie-Syntax-Semantik-Schnittstelle: ein HPSG-Ansatz. Philosophische dissertation, Universität Tübingen.

  • Riehemann S.Z. (1998) Type-based derivational morphology. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 49–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT. (Published in 1986 as Infinite Syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.)

  • Ross J.R. (1970) Gapping and the order of constituents. In: Bierwisch M., Heidolph K. (eds) Progress in linguistics. Mouton, The Hague, pp 249–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh J. (2007) Ordering and linearizing rightward movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(2): 349–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sag, I. A. (1976). Deletion and logical form. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published in 1980 by New York: Garland Press.

  • Sag I.A., Wasow T., Bender E.M. (2003) Syntactic theory A formal introduction (2nd ed). CSLI Publications, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk E. (1986) On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3: 371–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk E.O. (1982) The syntax of words. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. (1974). Topics in English morphology. MIT Dissertation.

  • Simpson, J. (1983). Aspects of Warlpiri morphology and syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Simpson J. (1991) Warlpiri morpho-syntax: A lexicalist approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith G. (2000) Word remnants and coordination. In: Thieroff R., Tamrat M., Fuhrhop N., Teuber O. (eds) Deutsche Grammatik in Theorie und Praxis. Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp 57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss S.L. (1982) Lexicalist phonology of English and German. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Suñer M. (1975) Spanish adverbs: Support for the phonological cycle?. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 602–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman J. (1985) A discussion of coordination and word-syntax. In: Jindřrich T. (eds) Studies in German grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 407–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Torner S. (2005) On the morphological nature of Spanish adverbs ending in -mente. Probus 17(1): 115–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trost, H. (1993). Coping with derivation in a morphological component. In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 368– 376). Utrecht.

  • Vergnaud J.-R. (1974). French relative clauses, Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge MA, MIT

  • Vigário M. (2003) The prosodic word in European portuguese. Interface Explorations 6. Mouton de Gruyter, Berline, Newyork

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigário M., Frota S. (2002) Prosodic word deletion in coordinate structures. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1(2): 241–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesche B. (1995) Symmetric coordination. An alternative theory of phrase structure. Niemeyer Verlag, Tüebingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler K., Culicover P. (1980) Formal principles of language acquisition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese R. (1992) Prosodic phonology and its role in the processing of written language. In: Görz G. (eds) Computing meaning, Konvens 92: 1. Konferenz “Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache”. Springer, Berlin, pp 139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese R. (1996) The phonology of German. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock G. et al (2005) Information structure and minimal recursion semantics. In: Arppa A. (eds) Inquiries into words, constraints and contexts: Festschrift for Kimmo Koskenniemi on his 60th Birthday, CSLI Studies in Computational Linguistics ONLINE. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 268–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder C. (1997) Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In: Alexiadou A., Hall T.A. (eds) Studies on universal grammar and typological variation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 59–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Yatabe, S. (2001). The syntax and semantics of left-node raising in Japanese. In D. Flickinger, & A. Kathol (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp. 325–344). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/ HPSG/1/.

  • Zaenen, A., & Karttunen, L. (1984). Morphological non-distinctness and coordination. In ESCOL 83 (pp. 309–320).

  • Zwicky, A. M. (1986). The unaccented pronoun constraint in English. In: A. M. Zwicky (Ed.), Interfaces, volume 32 of Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics (pp. 100–114). Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Linguistics Center of the University of Lisbon, Av. Gama Pinto, No. 2, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal

    Rui P. Chaves

Authors
  1. Rui P. Chaves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui P. Chaves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaves, R.P. Linearization-based word-part ellipsis. Linguist and Philos 31, 261–307 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9040-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9040-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation