Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Joint Moderating Impact of Moral Intensity and Moral Judgment on Consumer’s Use Intention of Pirated Software

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Moral issues have been included in the studies of consumer misbehavior research, but little is known about the joint moderating effect of moral intensity and moral judgment on the consumer’s use intention of pirated software. This study aims to understand the consumer’s use intention of pirated software in Taiwan based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) proposed by Ajzen (Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179, 1991). In addition, moral intensity and moral judgment are adopted as a joint moderator to examine their combined influence on the proposed research framework. The results obtained from this Taiwan case reveal that the antecedent constructs proposed in the TPB model–an individual’s attitude and subjective norms toward using pirated software, and perceived behavioral control to use pirated software–indeed have positive impacts on the consumer’s use intention of pirated software. In addition, the joint moderating effect of moral intensity and moral judgment is manifested in the consumer’s use intention of pirated software. The results of this study not only could substantiate the results of consumer misbehavior research, but also could provide some managerial suggestions for Taiwanese government authorities concerned and the related software industries devoted to fighting pirated software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I.: 1985, ‹From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior’, in J. Kuhland and J. Beckman (eds.), Action-Control: From Cognitions to Behavior Heidelberg (Springer, Heidelberg).

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaah, I.P. (1989). Differences in Research Ethics Judgments between Male and Female Marketing Professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 375–381. doi:10.1007/BF00381729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting Dishonest Actions Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, M., Clarence, G., Gravander, J., & Tuttle, M. (1987). A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 265–280. doi:10.1007/BF00382936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Software Alliances (BSA): 2007, The Fifth Annual BSA and IDC Global Software Piracy Study. http://w3.bsa.org/globalstudy/. Accessed 19 Jan 2009.

  • Carmines, E., & McIver, J.1981. ‹Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures’, in G. W. Bohrnstedt and E. F. Borgatta, (eds.), Social Measurement–Current Issues, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champoux, J.E., & Peters, W. (1987). Form, Effect Size and Power in Moderated Regression Analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M.K. (1998). Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1828–1834. doi:10.1023/A:1005721401993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A., & Eining, M. (1991). Factors Influencing Software Piracy: Implications for Accountants. Journal of Information Systems, 5, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Astous, A., F. Colbert and D. Montpetit: 2005, ‹Music Piracy on the Web–How Effective Are Anti-Piracy Arguments? Evidence from the Theory of Planned Behaviour’, Journal of Consumer Policy 28, 289-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. A., N. B. Johnson and D. G. Ohmer: 1998, ‹Issue-Contingent Effects on Ethical Decision-Making: A Cross-Cultural Comparison’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 373-389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. and S. Chaiken: 1993, The Psychology of Attitudes, (Fort Worth, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, TX).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eining, M. M. and A. L. Christensen: 1991, ‹A Psychosocial Model of Software Piracy: The Development and Test of a Model’, in R. Dejoie, G. Fowler and D. Paradice (eds.), Ethical Issues in Information Systems (Boyd Boston Fraser Publishing Company, Massachusetts), pp. 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen: 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, (Addison Wseley, Ma).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker: 1981, ‹Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error’, Journal of Marketing Research 18, 39-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G. R., D. F. Crown and D. F. Spake: 1997, ‹Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Business Practices: A Social Role Theory Perspective’, Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 920-934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, J. B. and D. G. Norris: 1987, ‹Research Note: Ethical Attitudes of Retail Store Managers: A Longitudinal Analysis’, Journal of Retailing 63, 298-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, S. H., M. A. Bumpus, J. E. Logan and J. R. Ciesla: 1997, ‹Re-Examining the Influence of Individual Values on Ethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1319-1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal. R. and G. Sanders: 1997, ‹Preventive and Deterrent Controls for Software Piracy’, Journal of Management Information Systems. 13, 29-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S. J.: 1997, ‹A Test of a Person-Issue Contingent Model of Ethical Decision Making in Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 927-939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. M. Vitell: 1986, ‹A General Theory of Making Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6, 5-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, H. and R. Green: 2002, ‹Computer Crimes’, American Criminal Law Review 39, 73-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‹Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, The Academy of Management Review 16, 366-395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and V. L. Huber: 1992, Issue Contingency in Ethical Decision Making. International Association for Business and Society Proceeding, pp. 156–166.

  • Kini, R. B., H. V. Ramakrishna and B. S. Vijayaraman: 2004, ‹Shaping of Moral Intensity Regarding Software Piracy: A Comparison between Thailand and U.S. Students’, Journal of Business Ethics 49, 91-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kini, R. B., H. V. Rominger and B. S. Vijayaraman: 2000, ‹An Empirical Study of Software Piracy and Moral Intensity among University Students’, The Journal of Computer Information Systems 40, 62-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, D. G., L. L. Kupper, K. E. Muller and A. Nizam: 1998, Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods, (Duxberry Press, Pacific Grove, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, F. Y. and M. H. Hsu: 2001, ‹Development and Validation of Ethical Computer Self-Efficacy Measure: The Case of Softlifting’, Journal of Business Ethics 32, 299-315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwong, K. K., O. H. M. Yau, J. S. Y. Lee, L. Y. M. Sin and A. C. B. Tse: 2003, ‹The Effects of Attitudinal and Demographic Factors on Intention to Buy Pirated CDs: The Case of Chinese Consumers’, Journal of Business Ethics 47, 223-235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loch, K.D. and S. Conger: 1996, ‹Evaluating Ethical Decision Making and Computer Use’, Communications of the ACM 39, 74-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon, J. M., J. K. Thompson and R. A. Reid: 1994, ‹Software Piracy: Is It Related to Level of Moral Judgment’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 849-857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcoulides, G. A. and R. E. Schumacker: 1996, Advanced Structural Equation Modeling, (Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A. and R. A. McDonald: 1995, ‹The Role of Moral Intensity in Moral Judgments: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 715-726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peace, G. A., D. F. Galletta and J. Y. L. Thong: 2003, ‹Software Piracy in the Workplace: A Model and Empirical Test’, Journal of Information Management Systems 20, 153-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna, H. V., R. B. Kini and B. S. Vijayaraman: 2001, ‹Shaping of Moral Intensity Regarding Software Piracy in University Students: Immediate Community Effects’, The Journal of Computer Information System 41, 47-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M.: 1989, ‹Taking Stock: Can the Theory of Reasoned Action Explain Unethical Conduct?’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 873-882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990, Methodology in Business Ethics: A Review and Critical Assessment. Journal of Business Ethics 9, 457-471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: 1990, ‹Toward the Development of A Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 639-653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1979, Development in Judgment Moral Issues, Minneapolis, (University of Minnesota Press, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, (Praeger, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D. P., R. E. Reidenbach and P. J. Forrest: 1996, ‹The Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue as an Influence on the Ethical Decision-Making of ad managers’, Journal of Business Research 35, 17-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc.: 1999, SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 8, Cary, (NC: SAS Institute Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. S.: 1996, ‹The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 469-474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. S. and A. F. Singer: 1997, ‹Observer Judgments about Moral Agents’ Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 473-484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., S. J. Vitell and G. R. Franke: 1999, ‹Antecedents, Consequences and Mediating Effects of Perceived Moral Intensity and Personal Moral Philosophies’, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 27, 19-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, K. E.: 1978, ‹Substantive Theory and Statistical Interaction: Five Models’, American Journal of Sociology 83, 1154-1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, B.: 2002, ‹Understanding Consumer Ethical Decision Making with Respect to Purchase of Pirated Software’, The Journal of Consumer Marketing 19, 96-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S. and P. A. Todd: 1995, Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research 6, 144-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonglet, M.: 2002, ‹Consumer Misbehavior: An Exploratory Study of Shoplifting’, Journal of Consumer Behavior 1, 336-354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., C. D. Sutton and R. Woodman.: 1985, Effects of Reinforcement Contingencies and Cognitive Moral Development on Ethical Decision-Making Behavior. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego, CA.

  • Villazon, C. H. and P. Dion: 2004, ‹Software Piracy: A Study of Formative Factors’, Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship 9, 66-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. and D. L. Davis: 1990. ‹Ethical Beliefs of MIS Professionals: The Frequency and Opportunity for Unethical Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 67-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1993. Assessing the Role of the Moral Issue and Its Intensity upon Managerial Decision Making. International Association for Business and Society Proceedings, pp. 390–394.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tatung University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Mei-Fang Chen, Ching-Ti Pan & Ming-Chuan Pan

Authors
  1. Mei-Fang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ching-Ti Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ming-Chuan Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei-Fang Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, MF., Pan, CT. & Pan, MC. The Joint Moderating Impact of Moral Intensity and Moral Judgment on Consumer’s Use Intention of Pirated Software. J Bus Ethics 90, 361–373 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0046-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0046-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation