Abstract
This study introduced a phenomenological approach to the study of the companies that committed corporate crimes. The author first developed the epistemology of normative control which is based on the philosophical ground of phenomenology, sociology of knowledge, ethnomethodology, Habermas's normative theories, and Foucault's normalizing discourse in the context of organizations. He, then, showed the procedures for conducting a qualitative and phenomenological empirical case study of an aggressive Japanese company whose name appeared in the media for its scandal in Tokyo. The inquiry revealed the generative mechanism of normative control and the patterns of constructing social reality of workplaces in a Japanese company.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann: 1966, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge(Doubleday, New York).
Burns, N.: 1989, ‘Standards for Qualitative Research’, Nursing Science Quarterly 2(1), pp. 44–52.
Chikudate, N.: 1995, ‘Reflexive Organization: From the Grounded Theoretical Study of Knowledge-Based Corporations in Japan’, Paper presented at the Euro-Asia Management Studies Association conference, Milan, Italy.
Chikudate, N.: 1997, ‘A Phenomenological Reasoning in the Analysis of Corporate Crimes and Scandals: A Study of Japanese Business Communities’, Paper presented at the Academy of Management conference, Boston, U.S.A., August.
Chikudate, N.: 1999, ‘The State of Collective Myopia in Japanese Business Communities: A Phenomenological Study for Exploring Blocking Mechanisms for Change’, Journal of Management Studies 36(1), pp. 69–86.
D'Andrade, R. G.: 1987, ‘Modal Responses and Cultural Expertise’, American Behavioral Scientist 31(2), pp. 194–202.
Durkheim, E.: 1953, Sociology of Philosophy(Free Press, Glencoe, IL).
Etzioni, A.: 1968, The Active Society(Free Press, New York).
Foucault, M.: 1972, The Archaeology of Knowledge & the Discourse on Language(Pantheon Books, New York).
Foucault, M.: 1977, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison(Vintage Books, New York).
Garfinkel, H.: 1963, ‘A Conception of, and Experiments With, “Trust” as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions’, in O. J. Harvy (ed.), Motivation and Social Interaction(Ronald Press, New York), pp. 187–238.
Geertz, C.: 1983, Local Knowledge(Basic Books, New York).
Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss: 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategy for Qualitative Research (Aldine de Gruyter, New York).
Giddens, A.: 1984, The Constitution of Society(Polity, Cambridge).
Goffman, E.: 1967, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior(Pantheon Books, New York).
Habermas, J.: 1973, Theory and Practice(Beacon Press, Boston).
Habermas, J.: 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society(Polity Press, Cambridge).
Habermas, J.: 1988, On the Logic of the Social Sciences(MIT Press, Cambridge).
Habermas, J.: 1992, Postmetaphysical Thinking(Polity Press, Cambridge).
Habermas, J.: 1996, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy(MIT Press, Cambridge).
Harris, L. and V. E. Cronen: 1979, ‘Rule-based Model for the Analysis and Evaluation of Organizational Communication’, Communication Quarterly 27(1), pp. 12–28.
Heigegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time(Haper & Row, New York).
Husserl, E.: 1973, Experience and Judgment (Northwestern University Press, Evanston).
Husserl, E.: 1982, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Volume 2 First Book General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology(Maritunus Nijhoff, The Hague).
Inzerilli, G.: 1981, ‘Preface: Some Conceptual Issues in the Study of the Relationships between Organizations and Societies’, International Studies of Management and Organization 10(4), pp. 3–14.
Janowitz, M.: 1991, On Social Organization and Social Control: Edited and with an Introduction by James Burk. The Heritage of Sociology(University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Koza, M. P. and J.-C. Thoenig: 1995, ‘Organizational Theory at the Crossroads: Some Reflections on European and United States Approaches to Organizational Research’, Organizational Science 6(1), pp. 1–8.
Krippendorff, K.: 1980, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology(Sage, Thousand Oaks).
Landry, M.: 1995, ‘A Note on the Concept of “Problem”’, Organization Studies 16(2), pp. 315–343.
Laufer, W. S. and D. C. Robertson: 1997, ‘Corporate Ethics Initiatives as Social Control’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, pp. 1029–1048.
Lyles, M. A. and I. I. Mitroff: 1980, ‘Organizational Problem Formulation: An Empirical Study’, Administrative Science Quarterly 25, pp. 102–119.
Mannheim, K.: 1936, Ideology and Utopia(Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York).
Massarik, F.: 1983, ‘Searching for Essence in Executive Experience’, in Suresh Srivastva and Associates (eds.), The Executive Mind: New Insights on Managerial Thought and Action( Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco), pp. 243–268.
Mead, G. H.: 1934, Mind, Self, & Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist(University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Moustakas, C.: 1994, Phenomenological Research Methods(Sage, Thousand Oaks).
Nikkei Weekly: 1993, ‘Executive Fail to Own up to Corporate Wrongdoing; Victim Mentality Promotes Perpetuation of Scandals’, August 23, p. 7.
Ouchi, W.: 1980, ‘Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans’, Administrative Science Quarterly 25, pp. 129–141.
Pike, K. L.: 1967, Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior, 2nd edition (Mouton, The Hague).
Pollner, M.: 1974, ‘Mundane Reasoning’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 4, pp. 35–54.
Pollner, M.: 1987, Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Powell, W. W. and P. DiMaggio (eds.): 1991, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis(University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C. and W. H. Batchelder: 1986, ‘Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy’, American Anthropologist 88(2), pp. 313–338.
Scheler, M.: 1980, Problems of a Sociology of Knowledge(Routledge, London).
Scheler, M.: 1992, On Feeling, Knowing, and Valuing(University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Schutz, A.: 1967, The Phenomenology of the Social World(Northwestern University Press, Evanston).
Schutz, A.: 1973, Collected Papers?: The Problem of Social Reality(Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague).
Weber, J.: 1993, ‘Institutionalizing Ethics into Business Organizations: A Model and Research Agenda’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3(4), pp. 419–434.
Weick, K. E.: 1995, Sensemaking in Organizations(Sage, Thousand Oaks).
Weller, S. C.: 1987, ‘Shared Knowledge, Intracultural Variation, and Knowledge Aggregation’, American Behavioral Scientist 31(2), pp. 178–193.
Wuthnow, R., J. D. Hunter, A. Bergesen and E. Kurtzweil: 1984, Cultural Analysis: The Work of Peter L. Berger, Mary Douglas, Michel Foucault and Jürgen Habermas(Routledge, London).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
For the sabbatical period August 1999–August 2000:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chikudate, N. A Phenomenological Approach to Inquiring into an Ethically Bankrupted Organization: A Case Study of a Japanese Company. Journal of Business Ethics 28, 59–72 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006266623545
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006266623545