Article Text

Download PDFPDF
In the room when it happens
  1. Paul Chin1,
  2. Guillermo A Palchik1,2
  1. 1 Department of Psychiatry, Sutter Health California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
  2. 2 Department of Advanced Organ Therapies and Transplantation, Sutter Health California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Guillermo A Palchik, Department of Psychiatry, Sutter Health California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco 94109, CA, USA; PalchiGA{at}sutterhealth.org

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Medicine has historically been slow to adopt new technologies. Although telepsychiatry was already to some degree in use before the COVID-19 pandemic, the imposed limitations on person-to-person contacts accelerated its growth exponentially. Outcome studies have generally supported telepsychiatry’s use,1 but the breathtaking rapid shift from in-person to video visits across psychiatry has occurred prior to more in-depth examinations on the fundamental changes to the nature of the patient–physician interface.

In their paper: “Can you hear me?”: communication, relationship and ethics in video-based telepsychiatric consultations’, the authors aptly take this deep dive, carefully parsing out the potential areas of change from live visits to virtual sense by sense. The authors describe the sensory and spatial context of psychiatric consultation, where vision, hearing and even smell play a role in the assessment of the patient. Furthermore, they consider multiple aspects around telepsychiatric consultations, including technical and educational components for patients and clinicians, and highlight the ethical dimensions of a psychiatric consultation under this new model.2

How many clinical clues might a …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

Other content recommended for you