Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer Trust, Social Marketing and Ethics of Welfare Exchange

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The global corporate scandals such as Enron, Worldcom and Global Crossing have raised fundamental issues of business ethics as well as economic, social and anthropological questions concerning the nature of business competition and global capitalism. The purpose of this conceptual paper is to introduce the concept of “welfare exchange” to the existing notions of economic, social and anthropological notions of business and exchange in markets and society in the 21st century. Global competition and business success in the 21st century continue to raise the nature of economic value and the interaction among diverse actors in international markets, institutions and society. We believe that the nature of such exchange between consumers and organizations, which can also be termed social marketing, need to increasingly take into account a welfare and ethical component. In this paper, we introduce our concept of welfare exchange to emphasize the importance of such welfare and ethical issues in the global business environment of the 21st century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson E. (1996) Management Fashion. Academy of Management Review 21:254–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aharony J., Swary I. (1996) Additional Evidence on Information-based Contagion Effects of Bank Failure. Journal of Banking & Finance 20:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen A. (2002) Marketing Social Marketing in the Social Change Marketplace. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 21:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki M. (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auger P., Burke P., Devinney T., Louviere J. (2003) What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features? Journal of Business Ethics 42:281–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee A. V. (1992) A Simple Model of Herd Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:797–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks M., Lovatt A., O’Connor J., Raffo C. (2000) Risk and Trust in the Cultural Industries. Geoforum 31:453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J. B., Hansen M. H. (1994) Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal 15:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel Y. (1982) Measurement Cost and the Organization of the Markets. Journal of Law and Economics 25:27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman M. H. (2001) Consumer Research for Consumers. Journal of Consumer Research 27:499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi R. (2006) Associations Between Hofstedes’ Cultural Constructs and Social Desirability Response Bias. Journal of Business Ethics 65:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein P. L. (1996) Against the Gods – the Remarkable Story of Risk. John Wiley & Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggart N., Delbridge R. (2005) Systems of Exchange. Academy of Management Review 30:127–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenkert G. (2002) Ethical Challenges of Social Marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 21:14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broniarczyk S., Alba J. (1994) The Importance of Brand in Brand Extension. Journal of Marketing Research 31:214–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi C. J., Millar C. (2005) Knowledge Entanglements. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby M., Karni E. (1973) Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud. Journal of Law and Economics 16:67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T. (2003) Editor’s Comments: Taking Ethics Seriously – a Mission Now More Possible. Academy of Management Review 28:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Felcher M. (2001) It’s No Accident: How Corporations Sell Dangerous Baby Products. Common Courage Press, Monroe, ME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun C. (2000) Corporate Reputation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal R., Dharwadkar R. (2002) The Role of the Institutional Environment in Marketing Channels. Journal of Marketing 66:82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries F., Reed R. (2000) Trust and Adaptation in Relational Contracting. Academy of Management Review 25:873–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. B., Choi C. J. (2003) Reputation and Product Tampering in Service Industries. Service Industries Journal 23:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline W. (2006) Business Ethics from the Internal Point of View. Journal of Business Ethics 64:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad A., Steurer R., Langer M., Martinuzzi A. (2006) Empirical Findings on Business–Society Relations in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics 63:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova T., Zaheer S. (1999) Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: the Case of the Multinational Enterprise. Academy of Management Review 24:64–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina M. J. (1987) Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1:121–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M.: 1955, The Gift, reprinted (Routledge, London)

  • Millar C. J. M., Choi C. J. (2003) Advertising and Knowledge Intermediaries: Managing the Ethical Challenges of Intangibles. Journal of Business Ethics 48:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M. (1989) The Impact of External Parties on Brand Name Capital. Economic Inquiry 30:601–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negus K. (2002) The Work of Cultural Intermediaries and the Enduring Distance Between Production and Consumption. Cultural Studies 16:501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson P. (1970) Information and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Political Economy 70:311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Picou A., Rubach M. (2006) Does Good Governance Matter to Institutional Investors? Evidence from the Enactment of Corporate Governance Guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics 65:55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds C., Schultz F., Hekman D. (2006) Stakeholder Theory and Managerial Decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics 64:285–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee R. (1982) Product Differentiation Advantages of Pioneering Brands. American Economic Review 72:349–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T. C. (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzkopf D. (2006) Stakeholder Perspectives and Business Risk Perception. Journal of Business Ethics 64:327–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarek Ibrahim Eldomiaty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, C.J., Eldomiaty, T.I. & Kim, S.W. Consumer Trust, Social Marketing and Ethics of Welfare Exchange. J Bus Ethics 74, 17–23 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9128-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9128-z

Keywords

Navigation