Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Transformational and Servant Leadership on Organizational Performance: A Comparative Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of two comparative leadership styles on organizational performance outcomes. The leadership styles undertaken is transformational and servant leadership. A sample of 155 participants is taken from profit-oriented service sector of Pakistan. Data through survey gathered on a five point likert scale from organizations. AMOS and SPSS are used for statistical analysis. The result shows that, transformational leadership has more impact on organizational learning than servant leadership. Furthermore organizational learning enhances organizational performance. Managers and leaders of corporate sector can get benefited from this study. Their main objective is to maximize the profitability of organization thus, they can choose leadership style which polishes their abilities and helps them to achieve profit maximization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. London: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barling, J., Weber, T., & Kelloway, E. K. (1996). Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal & financial outcomes: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 827–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. (2000). The future of leadership in learning organizations. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 18–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire technical report. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berson, Y., Shamair, B., Avolio, B. J., & Popper, M. (2001). The relationship between vision strength, leadership style & context. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contee-Borders, A. K. (2003). A case study defining servant leadership in the workplace. Dissertation Abstracts International, UMI No. 3069348.

  • Crippen, C. (2005). Servant-leadership as an effective model for educational leadership and management: First to serve, then to lead. Management in Education, 18(5), 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvir, T., Eden, E., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1081–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K., & Spears, L. C. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness, 25th anniversary edition. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamon, T. T. (2003). Organizational effectiveness as explained by social structure in a faith-based business network organization. unpublished doctoral dissertation, Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA.

  • Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. (1998). Innovation, marketorientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. A. (2006). Servant leadership and follower commitment. Proceedings of the 2006 Servant Leadership Research Roundtable, Retrieved April 7, 2007, from http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/sl_proceedings/2006/gilbert.pdf.

  • Johnson, C. (2001). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science, 7, 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li-An, H. (2011). Mediating, learning organizational innovation and performance. Industrial Management and Data System, 111(1), 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAulay, B. J., Zeitz, G., & Blau, G. (2006). Testing a Push–Pull theory of work commitment among organizational professionals. The Social Science Journal, 43, 571–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, J. L. (2007). The advisor as servant: The theoretical and philosophical relevance of servant leadership to academic advising. NACADA Journal, 27(2), 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. (2005). Subordinate-manager gender combination and perceived leadership-style influence on emotions, self-esteem and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, M. E., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (1993). Unlearning the organization. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, V., Montes, F., & Jover, A. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British Journal of Management, 19, 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. E., & Turnell, C. R. (2003). Market-based organizational learning and market performance gains. British Journal of Management, 14, 225–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parolini, J. L. (2007). Investigating the distinctions between transformational and servant leadership. doctoral dissertation thesis, Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA.

  • Rhodes, J., Hung, R., Lok, P., Lien, B., & Wu, C. (2008). Factors influencing organizational knowledge transfer: Implication for corporate performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(3), 84–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roh, T. H., Ahn, C. K., & Han, I. (2005). The priority factor model for customer relationship management system success. Expert Systems with Applications, 28, 641–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, W. G., Cannella, A. A., Jr, Rankin, D., & Gorman, D. (2005). Leader succession & organizational performance: Integrating the common-sense, ritual scape goating & vicious-circle succession theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(2), 197–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarros, J. C., Tanewski, G. A., Winter, R. P., Santora, J. C., & Densten, I. L. (2002). Work alienation and organizational leadership. British Journal of Management, 13, 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. S., & George, M. W. (2011). Servant leadership versus transformational leadership in voluntary service organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(1), 60–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendjaya, S., & Pekerti, A. (2010). Servant leadership as antecedent of trust in organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(7), 643–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Double-day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., Smith, B. J., & Kleiner, A. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Naver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, W. M., & Cummings, T. G. (1998). Organization learning disorders: Conceptual model and intervention hypotheses. Human Relations, 51, 873–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, C. U., D’Intino, R. S., & Victor, B. (1995). The moral quandary of transformational leadership: Change for whom? Research in Organizational Change and Development, 8, 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A., Russell, R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone, J. T. (2002). Personalism and moral leadership: The servant leader with transforming vision. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(4), 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. E. (1998). Servants of the people: The 1960s legacy of African-American leadership. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharatos, A., Barling, J., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Development & effects of transformational leadership in adolescents. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Iftikhar Choudhary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choudhary, A.I., Akhtar, S.A. & Zaheer, A. Impact of Transformational and Servant Leadership on Organizational Performance: A Comparative Analysis. J Bus Ethics 116, 433–440 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1470-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1470-8

Keywords

Navigation