Skip to main content
Log in

The Moral Foundations of Consumer Ethics

Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper applies moral foundations theory in the context of consumer ethics. The purpose of the study is to examine whether moral foundations theory can be utilised as a theoretical framework to explain consumers’ beliefs regarding both ethical and unethical consumption. The relationships among various moral foundations and different dimensions of consumer ethics are examined with a sample of 450 US consumers. The results demonstrate that, among the various moral foundations, only the sanctity/degradation foundation is negatively related to beliefs regarding all forms of unethical consumer actions (actively benefiting from illegal actions, passively benefiting from the mistakes of the seller and actively benefiting from legal but questionable actions) as well as ‘no harm, no foul’ actions. On the contrary, the care/harm, fairness/cheating and authority/subversion foundations are related to positive beliefs regarding ‘doing good’ actions. This indicates that moral motivations for supporting pro-social actions as a consumer are not necessarily the same as moral motivations for condemning unethical actions. The findings also demonstrate that the loyalty/betrayal foundation is positively related to beliefs regarding unethical consumer actions and negatively related to perceptions of pro-social consumer actions. This demonstrates that in-group loyalty leads to supporting unethical actions. Furthermore, the results show that various moral foundations mediate the relationships of idealism with consumers’ ethical beliefs. Hence, various moral foundations can explain the effects of personal variables on consumer ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arli, D., & Pekerti, A. (2016). Who is more ethical? Cross-cultural compassion of consumer ethics between religious and non-religious consumers. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 16(1), 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1789/1996). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSA (2016). Global software survey. Retrieved at http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2016/downloads/studies/BSA_GSS_US.pdf.

  • Buccafusco, C., & Fagundes, D. (2015). The moral psychology of copyright infringement. The Minnesota Law Review, 100, 2433–2507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, R. M. M. I. (2017). Emotional intelligence and consumer ethics: The mediating role of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), 527–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, R. M. M. I., & Fernando, M. (2014). The relationships of empathy, moral identity and cynicism with consumers’ ethical beliefs: the mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(4), 677–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. A., Andersen, M. G., & Curtis, M. B. (2001). Measuring ethical ideology in business ethics: A critical analysis of the ethics position questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., Nataraajan, R., & Huang, W. (2005). Consumers’ moral philosophies: Identifying the idealist and the relativist. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1690–1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2002). Empathy-related emotional responses, altruism, and their socialization. In R. J. Davidson & A. Harrington (Eds.), Visions of compassion: Western scientists and Tibetan Buddhists examine human nature (pp. 131–164). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5), 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., & Nye, J. L. (1990). Personal moral philosophy and moral choice. Journal of Research in Personality, 24(4), 388–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). East meets west: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 813–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, A. L., Iyer, R., Graham, J., Koleva, S., & Haidt, J. (2009). Are all types of morality compromised in psychopathy? Journal of Personality Disorders, 23(4), 384–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., et al. (2013). Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgement. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by religion and politics. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognise. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. A. (2006). Identity, reasoning and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30(3), 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, J. A. D., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. (2016). Blind loyalty? When group loyalty makes us see evil or engage in it. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132(1), 16–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1777/1960). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. La Salle: Open Court.

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, M., & Lorde, T. (2014). Why buy when we can pirate? The role of intentions and willingness to pay in predicting piracy behaviour. International Journal of Social Economics, 41(9), 801–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785/1993). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals (3rd ed.) (J. W. Ellington, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Khatri, N., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of cronyism in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture wars attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, M. Y., & Morris, K. A. (2005). Keeping it “all in the family”: Does nepotism in the hiring process really benefit the beneficiary? Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(2), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended reviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler-Smith, E. (2012). Before virtue: Biology, brain, behavior, and the ‘moral sense’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 351–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, M., & Park, J. H. (2011). The behavioural immune system (and why it matters). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidani, Y. M., Ghanem, A. J., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (2014). When idealists evade taxes: the influence of personal moral philosophy on attitudes to tax evasion—A Lebanese study. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(2), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simester, A. P. (1995). Why omissions are special? Legal Theory, 1(3), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2011). The expanding circle: Ethics, evolution, and moral progress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smithers, R. (2014). Global Fairtrade sales reach £4.4 billion following 15% growth during 2013. The Guardian.

  • Steenhaut, S., & Van Kenhove, P. (2006). An empirical investigation of the relationships among a consumer’s personal values, ethical ideology and ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behaviour in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vainio, A., & Makiniemi, J. (2016). How are moral foundations associated with climate friendly consumption? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(2), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2015). A case for consumer social responsibility (CnSR): Including a selected review of consumer ethics/social responsibility research. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 767–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin, J. R., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1991). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy–Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (2003). Consumer ethics: The role of religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, R., & Gore, P. A., Jr. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modelling. The Counselling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterich, K. P., Zhang, Y., & Mittal, V. (2012). How political identity and charity positioning increase donations: Insights from moral foundations theory. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chowdhury, R.M.M.I. The Moral Foundations of Consumer Ethics. J Bus Ethics 158, 585–601 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3676-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3676-2

Keywords

Navigation