Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg May 14, 2016

Autonomy, Recognition, and Social Dislocation

  • John Christman
From the journal Analyse & Kritik

Abstract

In numerous accounts of both autonomy and freedom, social or relational elements have been offered as conceptual requirements in addition to purely procedural conditions. In addition, it is claimed that social recognition of the normative authority or self-trust of the agent is conceptually required for autonomy. In this paper I argue that in cases where people find themselves completely dislocated from the social and cultural homes that had provided them with the language in which to formulate and express their values, it is clear that social recognition of the sort defended in relational models is causally but not conceptually required for agency to be (re-)established. This is shown by noting that often victims of human tracking or smuggling find themselves in foreign settings where it is quite up for grabs where and how they will attempt to reconstruct a life narrative which they can generally embrace. Therefore, seeing social recognition as conceptually required for autonomous agency or freedom would ignore the variability in the ways that such recognition must be expressed.

Published Online: 2016-05-14
Published in Print: 2009-11-01

© 2009 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2009-0205/html
Scroll to top button