Abstract
Current usage of the expression “human-centred” in computing contexts suffers from a lack of clarity, and involves internal contradictions. It is not enough to base the concept of human-centredness on ideas of social utility, collaborative working or human controllability. However, the concept of human action (which embodies reference to human freedom) provides a theoretical underpinning to human-centredness by combining, from a human standpoint, concern with process and concern with goals. This has consequences for the design process, prompting us to include new concerns in our system specifications and providing some pointers towards human-centred design methodology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gill, K.S. (1990) Summary of Human-Centred Systems Research in Europe SHAKE Centre, University of Brighton, p. 15.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958) Philosophical Investigations, Tr. G.E.M. Anscombe, Blackwell, ss 66 ff
Kling R (1991) Co-operation, Co-ordination and Control in Computer Supported Work, Communications of the ACM Vol. 34 No. 12, p84
Weber, M. (1949) Critical Studies in the Logic of the Cultural Sciences in E. Shils & H. Finch (eds) The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe Ill. Free Press, pp. 124 ff
Cooley, M. (1987) Architect or Bee? The Human Price of Technology Hogarth Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boyne, C. Notes towards a definition of human-centred computing. AI & Soc 8, 60–70 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065178
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065178