Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Institutional Pressures and Ethical Reckoning by Business Corporations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior studies have provided explanations for the presence, use and dissemination of codes of corporate ethics or codes of corporate conduct of business corporations. Most such explanations are functional in nature, and are descriptive as they are derived from the codes and their associated documents. We search for more underlying explanations using two complementary theories: first, social contract theories explaining the exogenous and endogenous reasons of organizational behavior, and then institutional theory explaining why organizations take similar measures in response to institutional pressures. Based on our explanations, we contend that the codes and their use and dissemination are arising from underlying social and institutional pressures for firms to continuously validate their existence in the face of increasing changes and recurrent uncertainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J.S., A. Tashchian and T.H. Shore: 2001, ‘Codes of Ethics as Signals for Ethical Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 29(3), 199-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M.: 1984, The Cooperative Game Theory of the Firm (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M.: 2001, Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A.: 2004, ‘Economic Ethics and Institutional Change’, Journal of Business Ethics 5(1-2), 191-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backof, J.F. and C.L. Martin, Jr.: 1991, ‘Historical Perspectives: Development of the Codes of Ethics in the Legal, Medical and Accounting Professions’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(2), 99-110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, J.: 2004, The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blodget, H.: 2008, ‘Why Wall Street Always Blow It’, The Atlantic Quarterly 302(5), 50-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T.L.: 2003, ‘Self-interest and Business Ethics: Some Lessons of the Recent Corporate Scandals’, Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 389-394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, C., P. Johnson and K. Smith: 1997, ‘Opening the Black Box: Corporate Codes of Ethics in their Organizational Context’, Journal of Business Ethics 16(10), 1077-1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Business Ethics: 1992, ‘Instilling Ethical Values in Large Corporations’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(11), 863-867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, F., G. Dean and K. Oliver: 2003, Corporate Collapse: Accounting, Regulatory and Ethical Failure (2nd edition) (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J.A. (ed.): 1968, Socialization and Society (Little Brown and Company, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, P.: 1998, ‘Codes of Conduct: A Framework for Ethics’, Australian Accountant 68(1), 28-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J.W.: 1994, ‘Is Business Ethics an Ozymoron?’, Business Horizons 37(5), 1-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, S.J. and T.L.N. Emerson: 2008, ‘Ethical Cycles and Trends: Evidence and Implications’, Journal of Business Ethics 81(4), 905-911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, B. and P. Leung: 2004, ‘Introducing a new age of materialism’, http://www.accaglobal.com/members/publications/accounting_business. Accessed 15 Feb 2007.

  • Copeland, J.E.: 2005, ‘Ethics as an Imperative’, Accounting Horizons 19(1), 35-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, G.: 2006, ‘The Autonomy of the Contracting Partners: An Argument for Heuristic Contractarian Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 68(3), 347-361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell: 1983, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review 48(2), 147-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, J.: 1990, ‘The Role of Ethics in Global Corporate Culture’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(6), 481-488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W.: 2006, ‘A Critical Perspective of Integrative Social Contracts Theory: Recurring Criticisms and Next Generation Research Topics’, Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 303-328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. and T. Donaldson: 1995, ‘Contractarian Business Ethics: Current Status and Next Steps’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(2), 173-186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethics Resource Center: 1980, Implementation and Enforcement: Codes of Ethics in Corporations and Associations (Opinion Research Corporation, Princeton, N.J.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethics Resource Center: 1990, Ethics Policies and Programs in American Business: Report of a Landmark Survey of U.S. Corporations (Ethics Resource Center, Washington, DC).

  • Farrell, H. and B.J. Farrell: 1998, ‘The Language of Business Codes of Ethics: Implications of Knowledge and Power’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(6), 587-601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O.C., J. Fraedrich and L. Ferrell.: 2008, Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases (7th edition) (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, J.R.: 1990, ‘Survival Ethics’, Business Quarterly 55(2), 40-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, M.S.: 1989, ‘Professional Codes: Why, How, and With What Impact?’, Journal of Business Ethics 8(2-3), 109-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, W.B.: 1924, Codes of Ethics for Business and Commercial Organizations’, International Journal of Ethics 35(1), 41-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwell, R. M.: 1987, The Morality of Capitalism, Working Paper 87-007 (Australian Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales, Sydney).

  • Heugens, P.P.M.A.R., J. van Oosterhout, and M. Kaptein: 2006, ‘Foundations and Applications for Constractualist Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 68(3), 211-228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs-Kleyn, N. and D. Kapelianis: 1999, ‘The Role of Professional Codes in Regulating Ethical Conduct’, Journal of Business Ethics 19(4), 363-374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J.W., M.B. Metzger and D.R. Dalton: 1992, ‘How Ethical is Your Company?’, Management Accounting, 74(1), 59-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeurissen, R.: 2004, ‘Institutional Conditions of Corporate Citizenship’, Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 87-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M.: 2004, ‘Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say?’, Journal of Business Ethics 50(1), 13-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M.: 2008, ‘Developing a Measure of Unethical Behavior in the Workplace: A Stakeholder Perspective’, Journal of Management 34(5), 978-1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. and M.S. Schwartz: 2008, ‘The Effectiveness of Business Codes: A Critical Examination of Existing Studies and the Development of an Integrated Research Model’, Journal of Business Ethics 77(2), 111-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. and J. Pinkse: 2006, ‘Stakeholder Mismanagement and Corporate Social Responsibility Crises’, European Management Journal 24(1), 59-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG: 2000, Ethics Survey – 2000: Managing for Ethical Practice (KPMG Financial Advisory Services, Toronto).

  • Laufer, W.S. and D.C. Robertson: 1997, ‘Corporate Ethics Initiatives as Social Control’, Journal of Business Ethics, 16(10), 1029-1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, A. Jr: 1998, ‘The Numbers Game’, The Cpa Journal 68(12), 14-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, B.S. and C. Driscoll: 2008, ‘Codes of Ethics and the Pursuit of Organizational Legitimacy: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions’, Journal of Business Ethics 77(2), 173-189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and B. Rowan: 1977, ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 83(2), 340-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitnick, B.M. and J.F. Mahon: 2007, ‘The Concept of Reputational Bliss’, Journal of Business Ethics 72(4), 323-333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P.E.: 1995, ‘Corporate Ethics Statements: Current Status and Future Prospects’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(9), 727-740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, N.: 1994, ‘Ethics in Organizations: A Framework for Theory and Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(8), 581-596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noreen, E.: 1988, ‘The Economics of Ethics: A New Perspective on Agency Theory’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 13(4), 359-369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B. and G. Madden: 2006, ‘Ethical Codes of Conduct in Irish Companies: A Survey of Code Content and Enforcement Procedures’, Journal of Business Ethics 63(3), 217-236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajunen, K.: 2006, ‘Living in Agreement with a Contract: The Management of Moral and Viable Firm–Stakeholder Relationships’, Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J.: 1981, ‘Management as Symbolic Action: The Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms’. In: L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 3. AI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J.: 1997, New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R.A. and M.E. Johnson-Cramer: 2006, ‘Ties that Unwind: Dynamism in Integrative Social Contract Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 68(3), 283-302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A.M., D.J. Cooper, D.P. Scarbrough and R.C. Chilton: 1995, ‘Changes in the Code of Ethics of the U.S. Accounting Profession, 1917 and 1988: The Continual Quest for Legitimation’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 20(6), 507-546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockness, H. and J. Rockness: 2005, ‘Legislated Ethics: From Enron to Sarbanes-Oxley, the Impact on Corporate America’, Journal of Business Ethics 57(1), 31-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L.: 1999, ‘Codes of Ethics as Contractarian Constraints on the Abuse of Authority within Hierarchies: A Perspective from the Theory of the Firm’, Journal of Business Ethics 21(2-3), 189-202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L.: 2006, ‘A Social Contract Account for CSR as an Extended Model of Corporate Governance (I): Rational Bargaining and Justification’, Journal of Business Ethics 68(3), 259-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L.: 2007, ‘A Social Contract Account for CSR as an Extended Model of Corporate Governance (II): Compliance, Reputation and Reciprocity’, Journal of Business Ethics 75(1), 77-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745.

  • Schwartz, M.: 2001, ‘The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behaviour’, Journal of Business Ethics 32(3), 247-262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.S.: 2004, ‘Effective Corporate Codes of Ethics: Perceptions of Code Users’, Journal of Business Ethics 55(4), 323-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.S.: 2005, ‘Universal Moral Values for Corporate Codes of Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 59(1-2), 27-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R.: 1995, Institutions and Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R.: 2003, Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems (5th edition) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • SEC: 2002, SEC Proposes Additional Disclosures, Prohibitions to Implement, Sarbanes-Oxley Act (The Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC).

  • Shaw, W.H.: 1991, Business Ethics (Wadsworth Belmont, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, J.M., M. Betz and L. O’Connell: 1997, ‘The Proactive Corporation: Its Nature and Causes’, Journal of Business Ethics 16(10), 1001-1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shocker, A.D. and S.P. Sethi: 1973, ‘An Approach to Incorporating Societal Preference in Developing Corporate Action Strategies’, California Management Review 15(4), 97-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R.R.: 1991, ‘The Institutionalization of Organizational Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(7), 493-506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B.: 1994, ‘An Analysis of Corporate Ethical Code Studies: “Where Do We Go from Here?”‘, Journal of Business Ethics 13(1), 63-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M.C.: 1995, ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’, Academy of Management Review 20(3), 571-610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.A. and D.W. Hart: 2006, ‘Psychological Contracts: A Nano-Level Perspective on Social Contract Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 68(3), 229-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K. and K.A. Nelson: 1995, Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do it Right (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbos, A.K., J.A. Gerard, P.R. Forshey, C.S. Harding and J.S. Miller: 2007, ‘The Positive Ethical Organization: Enacting a Living Code of Ethics and Ethical Organizational Identity’, Journal of Business Ethics 76(1), 17-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G.R.: 1993, ‘Corporate Codes of Ethics: Purpose, Process and Content Issues’, Business and Society 32(1), 44-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. W.: 1994, Business Ethics: A Managerial, Stakeholder Approach (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. and A. Rwabizambuga: 2006, ‘Institutional Pressures, Corporate Reputation, and Voluntary Codes of Conduct: An Examination of the Equator Principles’, Business and Society Review 111(1), 89-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G.: 1987, ‘Institutional Theories of Organizations’. Annual Review of Sociology 13, 443-464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

    Frances Chua

  2. Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand

    Asheq Rahman

Authors
  1. Frances Chua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asheq Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asheq Rahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chua, F., Rahman, A. Institutional Pressures and Ethical Reckoning by Business Corporations. J Bus Ethics 98, 307–329 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0551-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0551-9

Key words

Search

Navigation