Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Nelson, Linda D.
1991.
The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
158.
Cicchetti, Domenic V.
1991.
Reflections from the peer review mirror.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
167.
Salzinger, Kurt
1991.
Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
162.
Rosenthal, Robert
1991.
Some indices of the reliability of peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
160.
Zentall, Thomas R.
1991.
What to do about peer review: Is the cure worse than the disease?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
166.
Hargens, Lowell L.
1991.
Referee agreement in context.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
150.
Delcomyn, Fred
1991.
Peer review: Explicit criteria and training can help.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
144.
Cole, Stephen
1991.
Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
140.
Lock, Stephen P.
1991.
Should the blinded lead the blinded?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
156.
Cone, John D.
1991.
Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
142.
Gilmore, J. Barnard
1991.
On forecasting validity and finessing reliability.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
148.
Laming, Donald
1991.
Why is the reliability of peer review so low?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
154.
Crandall, Rick
1991.
What should be done improve reviewing?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
143.
Kiesler, Charles A.
1991.
Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
151.
Cohen, Patricia
1991.
Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
139.
Schönemann, Peter H.
1991.
In praise of randomness.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
162.
Mahoney, Michael J.
1991.
Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
157.
Fletcher, Jack M.
1991.
Journal availability and the quality of published research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
146.
Roediger, Henry L.
1991.
Is unreliability in peer review harmful?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
159.
Cicchetti, Domenic V.
1991.
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.