Skip to main content

Late Pleistocene Dual Process Minds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Explorations in Archaeology and Philosophy

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 433))

  • 358 Accesses

Abstract

The global dispersal of prehistoric ancient humans from Africa to North America, and the existence of artistic innovation evidenced in the Late Pleistocene are, by now, parts of a familiar and fascinating story. But the explanation of how our human career was possible cries out for clarification. In this chapter, I argue that dual process theory can provide the needed explanation. My claim will be that the advent of System-2 reasoning running offline, aided by executive cognitive control and language, and facilitated by neural plasticity, made possible the remarkable human dispersal from Africa to North America by way of the Middle East and Asia. System-1 modular adaptations, together with System-2 reasoning, gave rise to the flexible, culturally-informed, mental operations that were essential to shape the psychologically modern mind. The result was, inter alia, the surprising Late Pleistocene dispersal of ancient humans to North America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Clarke (2004, ch 4–5), for a detailed summary of this literature. The Wason Selection Task is the most intensively studied reasoning task in the history of psychology. It involves determining whether subjects reason in accordance with modus tollens, a standard deductive reasoning rule, in a variety of experimental set-ups.

References

  • Aubert M, Brumm A, Ramli M, Sutikna T et al (2014) Pleistocene cave art from Sulawesi, Indonesia. Nature 514:223–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubert M, Setiawan P, Oktaviana AA, Brum A et al (2018) Paleolithic cave art in Borneo. Nature 564:254–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahn P (2012) Cave art: a guide to the decorated ice age caves of Europe. Frances Lincoln, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) (1992) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen S (1995) Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarik RG (2013) Pleistocene paleoart of Asia. Arts 2(2):46–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R (1991) Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philos Stud 61:127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R (1999) Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller D (2005) Adapting minds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller D, Hardcastle V (2005) Modularity. In: Buller D (ed) Adapting minds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 127–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers P (2006) The architecture of the mind. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng P, Holyoak K (1985) Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cogn Psychol 17:391–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M (2004) Reconstructing reason and representation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M (2010) Concepts, intuitions, and epistemic norms. Logos Episteme 1(2):269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan A (2015) First humans to leave Africa went to China, not Europe New Scientist, 3043, October 17, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L (1989) The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Cognition 31:187–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (1992) Cognitive adaptions for social exchange. In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 163–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (1994) Origins of domain-specificity: the evolution of functional organization. In: Hirschfield L, Gelman S (eds) Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 85–116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (1996) Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgement under uncertainty. Cognition 58:1–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (1997a) Dissecting the computational architecture of social inference mechanisms. In: Ciba Foundation Symposium (ed) Characterizing human psychological adaptations. Wiley, New York, pp 132–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (1997b) The modular nature of human intelligence. In: Scheibel A, Schopf JW (eds) The origin and evolution of intelligence. Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury, pp 71–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (2010) Universal minds: human nature and the science of evolutionary psychology. Orion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (2013) On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation. In: Downes S, Machery E (eds) Arguing about human nature. Routledge, New York, pp 217–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies S (2012) The artful species. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1991) Consciousness explained. Little, Brown, and Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Simon and Shuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (2017) From bacteria to Bach and back: the evolution of minds. WW Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes S (2013) The basic components of the human mind were not solidified during the Pleistocene epoch. In: Downes S, Machery E (eds) Arguing about human nature. Routledge, New York, pp 93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes S, Machery E (eds) (2013) Arguing about human nature. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar R (2014) Human evolution. Pelican, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman J, Bates E, Johnson M, Karmiloff-Smith A, Parisi D, Plunkett K (1996) Rethinking innateness: a connectionist perspective on development. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J (2009) How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many? In: Evans J, Frankish K (eds) In two minds: dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 33–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, Frankish K (2009) The duality of mind: an historical perspective. In: Evans J, Frankish K (eds) In two minds: dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, Stanovich KE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspect Psychol Sci 8(3):223–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J (1983) The modularity of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes C (2018) Cognitive gadgets: the cultural evolution of thinking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James W (1890) The principles of psychology. Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird P (1983) Mental models. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith, H (2012) On reflection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski AW, Gigerenzer G (2011) Intuitive and deliberate judgements are based on common principles. Psychol Rev 118(1):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machery E, Barrett C (2006) David J. Buller: evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Philos Sci 73(2):232–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKone E (2009) Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances. Vis Res 49:268–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKone E, Palermo R (2010) A strong role for nature in face recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:4795–4796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer S (1999) Vision science: photons to phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (1994) The language instinct. William Morrow, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reber AS (1993) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson P, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Rito T, Vieira D, Conde-Sousa E, Pereira L, Mellars P, Richards MB, Soares P (2019) A dispersal of Homo sapiens from southern to eastern Africa immediately preceded the out-of-Africa migration. Sci Rep 9:472B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels R (1998) Evolutionary psychology and the massive modularity hypothesis. Br J Philos Sci 49(4):575–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels R (2009) The magical number two, plus or minus: dual-process theory as a theory of cognitive kinds. In: Evans J, Frankish K (eds) In two minds: dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 129–148

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sloman SA (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol Bull 119:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2011) From hominins to humans: how sapiens became behaviorally human. Philos Trans R Soc B 366:809–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2012) The evolved apprentice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2013) The informational commonwealth. In: Downes S, Machery E (eds) Arguing about human nature. Routledge, New York, pp 274–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby J, Cosmides L (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 19–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason P (1968) Reasoning about a rule. Q J Exp Psychol 20:273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Jesse Prinz and Edouard Machery for comments on the earlier version of this paper that was read at the Digging Deeper: Archaeological and Philosophical Perspectives conference (December 1-3, 2017). I would especially like to thank Anton Killin and Sean Allen-Hermanson for comments on several drafts of this paper. Those comments are deeply appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murray Clarke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clarke, M. (2021). Late Pleistocene Dual Process Minds. In: Killin, A., Allen-Hermanson, S. (eds) Explorations in Archaeology and Philosophy. Synthese Library, vol 433. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61052-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics