Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol., 07 April 2022
Sec. Health Psychology
This article is part of the Research Topic Psychophysiology of Stress View all 8 articles

Editorial: Psychophysiology of Stress

  • 1Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • 2Grupo de Investigación en Cultura, Educación y Sociedad, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla, Colombia
  • 3School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • 4Department of Health Psychology, Public University of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
  • 5Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Editorial on the Research Topic
Psychophysiology of Stress

Stress is a multifactorial complex phenomenon where organic resources are mobilized to deal with a real or perceived threat (Cohen et al., 1983). The stress response is one of the most important phylogenetic coping mechanisms that have allowed humans to successfully adapt to highly demanding and potentially dangerous contexts (Hadany et al., 2006; Korzan and Summers, 2021).

The intrinsic neurobiological mechanisms involved in the stress response have not changed much in the last stages of the evolution of the human being, prominently including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis and the autonomic nervous system (Ulrich-Lai and Herman, 2009; McEwen et al., 2015; Cohen et al., 2016). In contrast, our social context has changed dramatically recently in evolutionary terms. As result, we face a mismatch between adaptative psychophysiological stress response to acute physical stressors and the psychosocial and chronic nature of nowadays Western stressors (Cohen et al., 2016). For instance, physical activity levels continuously decreased during the last decades in the light of recent technological advances and increasingly sedentary lifestyle (Madore et al., 2020), whereas the positive role of physical activity on stress-related disorders has been widely acknowledged (Li et al., 2019; Loprinzi and Frith, 2019). Similarly, an increasing amount of studies have reported a positive correlate Western diet to acne, obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer, increasingly considered diseases of our civilization (Curry, 2013; Clatici et al., 2018). Moreover, exercise may play a protector role against brain aging and neurodegeneration (De Miguel et al., 2021). Indeed, socially induced chronic stress induces neuroplasticity in central stress-processing networks, causing sensitization as well as habituation of HPA axis and ANS responses with important health implications (Ulrich-Lai and Herman, 2009).

In the present special issue, it is shown how direct social evaluation of multitasking is a more potent stressor than multitasking with indirect evaluation, and the period of anticipation of stressful events may be critical to understanding the process of stress regulation. In this line and applied to the educational context, it was found how the order of presentation of different complexity/difficulty scenarios affects the autonomic stress response of undergraduate Psychology students undergoing an objective structured clinical examination. Students who underwent a high-complexity scenario first reported significantly higher autonomic stress response than students who began the objective structured clinical examination with a low-complexity scenario. Finally, in a Type 2 Diabetes older adults' population, a psychosocial stressor (Trier Social Stress Test) triggered significant increases in negative affect, cortisol and salivary alpha-amylase levels, and impaired working memory.

The present Research Topic consisted of seven research articles from different research groups and countries, covering a wide range of aspects and populations in this field. Although these articles did not cover all aspects of psychophysiology of stress, they provided important insight concerning populations that were under-represented in previous studies (e.g., students, older people with type 2 diabetes and health care professionals). Following Hariri and Holmes (2015) we hope that this collection of articles stimulates further future research in psychophysiology of stress and its implications for tackling stress-related disorders and diseases of civilization from a more comprehensive and evidence-based approach.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our acknowledgments to all those who contributed to the success of this Research Topic, namely all authors, reviewers, and Frontiers staff.

References

Clatici, V. G., Voicu, C., Voaides, C., Roseanu, A., Icriverzi, M., and Jurcoane, S. (2018). Diseases of civilization - cancer, diabetes, obesity and acne - the implication of milk, IGF-1 and mTORC1. Maedica 13, 273–281. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2018.13.4.273

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cohen, S., Gianaros, P. J., and Manuck, S. B. (2016). A stage model of stress and disease. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 456–463. doi: 10.1177/1745691616646305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24, 386–396.

Google Scholar

Curry, A.. (2013). The milk revolution. Nature 500, 20. doi: 10.1038/500020a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Miguel, Z., Khoury, N., Betley, M. J., Lehallier, B., Willoughby, D., Olsson, N., et al. (2021). Exercise plasma boosts memory and dampens brain inflammation via clusterin. Nature 600, 494–499. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04183-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hadany, L., Beker, T., Eshel, I., and Feldman, M. W. (2006). Why is stress so deadly? An evolutionary perspective. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273, 881–885. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hariri, A. R., and Holmes, A. (2015). Finding translation in stress research. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1347–1352. doi: 10.1038/nn.4111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Korzan, W. J., and Summers, C. H. (2021). Evolution of stress responses refine mechanisms of social rank. Neurobiol. Stress 14, 100328. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100328

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, A., Yau, S. Y., Machado, S., Wang, P., Yuan, T. F., and So, K. F. (2019). Enhancement of hippocampal plasticity by physical exercise as a polypill for stress and depression: a review. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 18, 294–306. doi: 10.2174/1871527318666190308102804

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loprinzi, P. D., and Frith, E. (2019). Protective and therapeutic effects of exercise on stress-induced memory impairment. J. Physiol. Sci. 69, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s12576-018-0638-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Madore, C., Yin, Z., Leibowitz, J., and Butovsky, O. (2020). Microglia, lifestyle stress, and neurodegeneration. Immunity 52, 222–240. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McEwen, B. S., Gray, J. D., and Nasca, C. (2015). 60 years of neuroendocrinology: redefining neuroendocrinology: stress, sex and cognitive and emotional regulation. J. Endocrinol. 226, 67–83. doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ulrich-Lai, Y. M., and Herman, J. P. (2009). Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 397–409. doi: 10.1038/nrn2647

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: physiology, psychology, education, disease, sport, environmental

Citation: Clemente-Suárez VJ, Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B and Ruisoto P (2022) Editorial: Psychophysiology of Stress. Front. Psychol. 13:896773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896773

Received: 15 March 2022; Accepted: 21 March 2022;
Published: 07 April 2022.

Edited and reviewed by: Selenia Di Fronso, University of Studies G. D'Annunzio Chieti and Pescara, Italy

Copyright © 2022 Clemente-Suárez, Nikolaidis, Knechtle and Ruisoto. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, vctxente@yahoo.es; Pantelis T. Nikolaidis, pademil@hotmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.