skip to main content
research-article

Cryptocurrencies as narrative technologies

Published:05 January 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Transitions in monetary technologies raise novel ethical and philosophical questions. One prominent transition concerns the introduction of cryptocurrencies, which are digital currencies based on blockchain technology. Bitcoin is an example of a cryptocurrency. In this paper we discuss ethical issues raised by cryptocurrencies by conceptualising them as what we call "narrative technologies". Drawing on the work of Ricoeur and responding to the work of Searle, we elaborate on the social and linguistic dimension of money and cryptocurrencies, and explore the implications of our proposed theoretical framework for the ethics of cryptocurrencies. In particular, taking a social-narrative turn, we argue that technologies have a temporal and narrative character: that they are made sense of by means of individual and collective narratives but also themselves co-constitute those narratives and inter-human and social relations; configuring events in a meaningful temporal whole. We show how cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin dynamically re-configure social relations and explore the consequent ethical implications.

References

  1. Boatright, John R. (ed.). 2010. Finance Ethics: Critical Issues in Financial Theory and Practice. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Cameron, A. 2015. Money's unholy trinity: Devil, trickster, fool. Culture and Organization, (May 2015), 1--16. http://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2015.1035721Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Clegg, A. G. 2014. Could Bitcoin be a financial solution for developing economies? University of Birmingham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Coeckelbergh, M. 2015. Money Machines: Electronic Financial Technologies, Distancing, and Responsibility in Global Finance. Farnham: Ashgate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DuPont, Q. 2014. The Politics of Cryptography: Bitcoin and The Ordering Machines. Journal of Peer Production, 1, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Folkinshteyn, D. 2015. A tale of twin tech: Bitcoin and the www. Journal of Strategic and International Studies, X(2), 82--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Heidegger, M. 1927. Being and Time (trans. J. Stambaugh). Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Heidegger, M. 1954. The Question Concerning Technlogy. In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (trans. William Lovitt), New York: Harper & Row, 3--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidemann, C. 1999. On Some Difficulties Concerning John Searle's Notion of an "Institutional Fact." Analyse & Kritik, 20, 143--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hodder, I. 2014. The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-Term View. New Literary History, 45(1), 19--36. http://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kaplan, D. M. 2003. Ricoeur's Critical Theory. New York: State University of New York Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Karlstrøm, H. 2014. Do libertarians dream of electric coins? The material embeddedness of Bitcoin. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 23--36. http://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2013.870083Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kostakis, V., & Giotitsas, C. 2015. The (A)political economy of bitcoin. In P2P & inov., (Rio de Janeiro, 2015) Vol. 2, No. 2, 28--44Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lessig, L. 2006. CODE version 2.0. New York: Basic Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Malefijt, L. de W. 2014. NLCoin. Bachelor Thesis. Universiteit Utrecht.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nakamoto, S. 2009. Bitcoin : A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. (White paper).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ricoeur, P. 1983. Time and Narrative - volume 1 (Vol. 91). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. http://doi.org/10.2307/1864383Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Roio, D. J. 2013. Bitcoin, the end of the Taboo on Money. Dyne.org Digital Press, (April 2013), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Samman, G. 2015. Blockchain Tech is the "Biggest Opportunity" for Banks to Stay Relevant, Says New Report. Retrieved June 21, 2015, from Cointelegraph: http://cointelegraph.com/news/113805/blockchain-tech-is-the-biggest-opportunity-for-banks-to-stay-relevantGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Searle, J. R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Shakespeare, W. 2005. As you like it. San Diego: ICON Group International. Retrieved from http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/1511/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Simmel, G. 1900. The Philosophy of Money. (D. Frisby, Ed.) (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge Classics, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Swan, M. 2015. Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy (first edit). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cryptocurrencies as narrative technologies

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society
        ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society  Volume 45, Issue 3
        Special Issue on Ethicomp
        September 2015
        446 pages

        Copyright © 2016 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 January 2016

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader