Skip to main content
Log in

The Prodigal and his Brother: Impartiality and the Equal Consideration of Interests

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the heart of Peter Singer’s utilitarianism is the impartial weighing of the interests of those affected by our actions. Singer calls this the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests. This paper argues that Singer’s Principle does not accord with our moral intuitions and the logic of our moral thinking. It discusses the Principle in the context of the parable of the Prodigal Son and his Brother – a parable that raises the issue of impartiality in a particularly challenging way. What the parable shows is, first, that our moral thinking often turns on judgements of fairness that are prior to any impartial weighing of interests; and, second, that impartial fairness itself is sometimes transcended by compassionate love. Both of these points have important implications for bioethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Coghlan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coghlan, P. The Prodigal and his Brother: Impartiality and the Equal Consideration of Interests. Theor Med Bioeth 26, 195–206 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-3978-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-3978-8

Keywords

Navigation