Just MarriageFrom the ground breaking legal decisions on gay marriage to the promotion of marriage for low-income families, the "sacred institution" of marriage has turned into a public battleground. Who should be allowed to marry and is marriage a public or private act? Should marriage be abandoned completely? Or should marriage be redefined as a civil institution that promotes sexual and racial equality?As the fierce national debate over same-sex marriage and civil unions continues, Mary Lyndon Shanley argues that while the state should continue to play a role in regulating personal relations, the law must be fundamentally reformed if marriage is to become a more just institution. Fourteen prominent writers and thinkers respond, including Nancy F. Cott, William N. Eskridge, Jr., Amitai Etzioni, Martha Albertson Fineman, and Cass R. Sunstein. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Amitai Etzioni benefits child choice citizens civil marriage civil union commitment communitarian conservatives contract model contractualists courts David Cruz debate disestablished economic Emens entity ethical authority federal feminist Fineman gay and lesbian gender heterosexual homosexual households husband ideal worker imaginary domain individual contracts institution intentionally left blank interdependency intimate caregiving intimate relationships justice law and policy legal recognition lesbian lesbian and gay liberal lives marital status marriage law marriage partners married couple Martha ment monogamous moral multiparty relationships Nancy Cott Neutered Mother no-fault divorce nonmonogamy normative normative account parents people’s plural marriage political polyamorous polyamory polygamy polygyny Professor Shanley’s promote protect public status recognize reforms Regan Jr regime rela relational interests responsibilities riage role same-sex couples same-sex marriage sexual Shanley’s social society spousal equality spouses state’s sustain tion tionships tive vulnerable wage Wendy Brown wife wives women