Skip to main content
Log in

Topic, Focus, and the Interpretation of Bare Plurals

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we show that focus structure determines the interpretation of bare plurals in English: topic bare plurals are interpreted generically, focused bare plurals are interpreted existentially. When bare plurals are topics they must be specific, i.e. they refer to kinds. After type-shifting they introduce variables which can be bound by the generic quantifier, yielding characterizing generics. Existentially interpreted bare plurals are not variables, but denote properties that are incorporated into the predicate.The type of predicate determines the interpretation of its bare plural subject. The individual/stage-level distinction, though important, is not sufficient: since only arguments can be topics, only those stage-level predicates which have locative arguments can have existential bare plural subjects.Certain verbs (e.g., hate) fail to incorporate their bare plural objects; therefore no existential reading of the object is available. We provide a novel solution to this puzzle based on the following two claims: (i) incorporated bare plurals do not introduce discourse referents; (ii) nonincorporating verbs are presuppositional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bresnan, J.: 1994, 'Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal Grammar', Language 60, 72-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. and F. Pelletier (eds.): 1995, The Generic Book. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G.: 1992, 'Anaphora and Dynamic Binding', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 111-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G.: 1995, 'Individual Level Predicates as Inherent Generics', in G. Carlson and F. Pelletier, pp. 176-223.

  • Chierchia, G.: 1998, 'Reference to Kinds across Languages', Natural Language Semantics 6, 339-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. and S. McConnel-Ginet: 1990, Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.: 1996, Think Generic! The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentence, PhD dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Published 1999 by CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.: 1999, 'Generics, Frequency Adverbs, and Probability', Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 221-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.: 2000, 'Bare Plurals and Suitability', presented at From NP to DP: International Conference on the Syntax and Pragma-semantics of Noun Phrases, Antwerp, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.: 2001, 'On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars', Journal of Semantics 18, 183-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Smet, L.: 1997, On Mass and Plural Quantification: The Case of French des/du-NPs, Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics, vol. 22, The University Press, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swart, H.: 1991, Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach, PhD dissertation, University of Groningen. Published by Garland Press, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, M.: 1992, Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovie-Sorin, C.: 1998, 'Types of Predicates and the Representation of Existential Readings', in A. Lawson (ed.) Proceedings of SALT 7. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovie-Sorin, C. and B. Laca, 1996: 'Generic BNPs', ms., Paris University and University of Strasbourg.

  • Erteschik-Shir, N.: 1997, The Dynamics of Focus Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erteschik-Shir, N. and T. R. Rapoport: 2000, 'Aspectual Focus', presentation at GLOW, Bilbao.

  • Farkas, D. and Y. Sugioka: 1983, 'Restrictive If/When Clauses', Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 225-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeze, R.: 1992, 'Existentials and Other Locatives', Language 68, 553-595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C. and M. Krifka: 1993, 'Genericity', in J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and Th. Vennemann (eds.), Handbuch der Syntax, pp. 966-978. De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasbey, S.: 1998, 'I-level Predicates that Allow Existential Readings for BPs', in A. Lawson (ed.), Proceedings and SALT 7, pp. 169-179. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer, G.: 1990, 'Semantics and Knowledge Representation in the Analysis of Generic Descriptions', Journal of Semantics 7, 92-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. and G. Ramchand: 1997, 'The Stage-Level/Individual-Level Distinction and the Mapping Hypothesis', in D. Willis (ed.), Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics, vol. 2, pp. 55-83.

  • Jäger, G.: 1999, 'Stage Levels, States, and the Semantics of the Copula', ZAS Papers in Linguistics 14, 63-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H.: 1981, 'A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation', in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language: Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 277-322. Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. and U. Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, K. E.: 1998, 'On Generic and Existential Bare Plurals and the Classification of Predicates', in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 145-162. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1995, 'Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates', in G. Carlson and F. Pelletier (eds.), pp. 125-175.

  • Krifka, M.: 1992, 'A Framework for Focus-Sensitive Quantification', in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 2, pp. 215-235. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, Columbus.

  • Krifka, M., F. Pelletier, G. Carlson, A. ter Meulen, G. Link, and G. Chierchia: 1995, 'Genericity: An Introduction', in G. Carlson and F. Pelletier, pp. 1-124.

  • Laca, B.: 1990, 'Generic Objects: Some More Pieces of the Puzzle', Lingua 81, 25-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, J.: 1973, 'Studies in English Generics', University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics 1(1), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav: 1995, Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L.: 1985, Operations on Lexical Forms: Unaccusative Rules in Germanic Languages, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Link, G.: 1995, 'Generic Information and Dependent Generics', in G. Carlson and F. Pelletier (eds.), pp. 358-382.

  • McNally, L.: 1998, 'Stativity and Theticity', in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 293-307. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1973, 'The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English', in J. Hintikka,, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, pp. 221-242. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H.: 1987, 'Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-shifting Principles', in J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, pp. 115-143. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H.: 1991, 'Topic, Focus and Quantification', in Proceedings of SALT 1, pp. 257-280. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H.: 1994, 'Focus Quantification, and Semantics-Pragmatics Issues', in P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.), Working Papers of the Institute for Logic &; Linguistics. IBM Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1988, Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T.: 1981, 'Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics', Philosophica 27, 53-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, L. and F. Pelletier: 1987, 'Problems in the Interpretation of the Logical Form of Generics, Bare Plurals and Mass Terms', in E. LePore (ed.), New Directions in Semantics, pp. 385-451. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1964, 'Identifying Reference and Truth-Values', Theoria 30, 96-118. Reprinted in D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.), 1971, Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, pp. 86-99. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, A.: 1997, 'Strategies for Scope Taking', in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 109-154. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Meulen, A.: 1995, 'Semantic Constraints on Type-Shifting Anaphora', in G. Carlson and F. Pelletier (eds.), pp. 339-357.

  • van der Sandt, R.: 1992, 'Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution', Journal of Semantics 9, 333-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Geenhoven, V.: 1996, Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions, PhD dissertation, University of Tübingen. Published 1998 by CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K.: 1991, Studies in the Semantics of Generic Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, E.: 1993, 'On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Verbs', Natural Language Semantics 1, 149-179.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, A., Erteschik-Shir, N. Topic, Focus, and the Interpretation of Bare Plurals. Natural Language Semantics 10, 125–165 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016576614139

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016576614139

Keywords

Navigation