Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human diagrammatic reasoning and seeing-as

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper addresses the issue of human diagrammatic reasoning in the context of Euclidean geometry. It develops several philosophical categories which are useful for a description and an analysis of our experience while reasoning with diagrams. In particular, it draws the attention to the role of seeing-as; it analyzes its implications for proofs in Euclidean geometry and ventures the hypothesis that geometrical judgments are analytic and a priori, after all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audi R.: Reasons/causes. In: Dancy, J., Sosa, E. (eds) A companion to epistemology, pp. 424–426. Blackwell, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Avigad, J., Dean, E., & Mumma J. (2008). A formal system for Euclid’s Elements. Review of Symbolic Logic, forthcoming.

  • Boghossian P.: Epistemic rules. Journal of Philosophy 105(9), 472–500 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne O.: The first six books of the elements of Euclid. William Pickering, London (1847)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coliva A.: Wright and McDowell on the content of experience and the justification of empirical beliefs. Lingua e Stile 36(1), 3–23 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coliva A.: In difesa del contenuto non concettuale della percezione. In: Parrini, P. (eds) Conoscenza e cognizione, pp. 147–161. Guerini, Milano (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coliva A.: The finer-grained content of experience. A redefinition of its role within the debate between McDowell and nonconceptual theorists. Dialectica 57(1), 57–70 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coliva, A. (2004/2006). I concetti. Roma: Carocci.

  • Euclid. (1959). Elements, published as Euclid’s Elements: All thirteen books complete in one volume (T. Heath, Trans., D. Densmore, Ed.). New York: Dover Books.

  • Giaquinto, M. (2007a). Visual thinking in mathematics. An epistemological study (esp. Chaps. 1–5). Oxford, OUP

  • Giaquinto M.: Visualizing in mathematics: An introduction. In: Mancosu, P. (eds) The philosophy of mathematical practice, pp. 32–58. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2007b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardino, V. (ms.). Diagrams and manipulation practices: The margins for an empirical research.

  • Glasgow, J., Narayanan, N. H., Chandrasekaran, B. (eds): Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Macbeth D.: Diagrammatic reasoning in Euclid’s Elements”. In: Van Kerkhove, B., De Vuyst, J., Van Bendegem, J.-P. (eds) Philosophical perspectives on mathematical practice, pp. 235–267. College Publications, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Macbeth, D. (2011). Diagrammatic reasoning in Frege’s Begriffßchrift. this issue, Vol. 2.

  • Malone M. E.: Kuhn reconstructed: Incommensurability without relativism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24(1), 66–93 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manders K.: Diagram-based geometric practice. In: Mancosu, P. (eds) The philosophy of mathematical practice, pp. 88–111. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2007a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manders K.: The Euclidean diagram. In: Mancosu, P. (eds) The philosophy of mathematical practice, pp. 112–183. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2007b)

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell J.: Mind and world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Netz R.: The shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owens K., Outhred L.: The complexity of learning geometry and measurement. In: Gutiérrez, A., Boero, P. (eds) Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education, pp. 83–115. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Panza, M. (2011). The two-fold role of diagrams in Euclid’s plain geometry. this issue, Vol. 2.

  • Peacocke C.: A study of concepts. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito K.: A preliminary study in the critical assessment of diagrams in Greek mathematical works. Sciamus 7, 81–144 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. J. (2008). Review of Giaquinto 2007a. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Accessed July 29, 2008, from http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=13745.

  • Shin, S. J. (2011). The forgotten individual: Diagrammatic reasoning in mathematics. this issue, Vol. 2.

  • Wittgenstein L.: Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, Oxford (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L.: Remarks on the philosophy of psychology (Vols. 1, 2). Chicago University Press, Chicago (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

    Annalisa Coliva

Authors
  1. Annalisa Coliva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annalisa Coliva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coliva, A. Human diagrammatic reasoning and seeing-as. Synthese 186, 121–148 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9982-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9982-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation