Persistent Narratives: Intellectual Disability in Canadian Children’s Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v18i1.3989Keywords:
disabled children’s childhood studies, eugenic narratives, neoliberal diversityAbstract
Canadian children’s literature rarely depicts characters labelled with intellectual disabilities, yet when it does it often remains mired in stereotypes that recycle prevalent myths and misconceptions. Even as more recent literature attempts to push back against such stereotypes, it nevertheless predominantly remains caught in these dangerous representational repertoires. This article offers a brief history of Canadian literary depictions of intellectual disability and a critique of the Canadian publishing spheres. Through a critical analysis of Lorna Schultz Nicholson’s book Fragile Bones, we discuss the limits of representation of intellectual disability in children’s fiction. We also offer a critique of the ableist publishing climate in Canada and suggest that structural barriers prevent disabled writers from entering the literary marketplace on an equal playing field. These barriers to publishing lead to the vast underrepresentation of disabled authors and the misrepresentation of disability in general and intellectual disability in particular in Canadian children’s literature.
References
Adomat, D. S. (2014). Exploring issues of disability in children’s literature discussions. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v34i3.3865
Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.
Baker, B. (2014). Camp outlook. Second Story Press.
Best Buddies Canada. (2022). About us. Best Buddies Canada. https://bestbuddies.ca/about-us/
Brenna, B. (2009). Creating characters with diversity in mind: Two Canadian authors discuss social constructs of disability in literature for children. Language and Literacy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.20360/G2201G
Carlson, L. 2015. Music, intellectual disability, and human flourishing. In B. Howe, S. Jensen-Moulton, N. Lerner & J. Straus (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music and disability studies (pp. 37-53. Oxford University Press.
Chandler, E. (2014). Disability and the desire for community (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto.
Collins, K. (2015). Cripping narrative: Story telling as activism. Knots: An Undergraduate Journal of Disability Studies, 1, 31-37.
Crabb, C. M. (2019). Friendship and the Best Buddies program. In T. Heller, R. Gould, S. P. Harris & C. J. Gill (Eds.), Disability in American life: An encyclopedia of concepts, policies, and controversies (pp. 295-297). ABC-CLIO.
Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Disabled children’s childhood studies: A distinct approach? Disability & Society, 29(10), 1617-1630.
Curwood, J. S. (2013). Redefining normal: A critical analysis of (dis)ability in young adult literature. Children’s Literature in Education, 44(1), 15-28.
Davis, L. J. (2011. September 25). Why is disability missing from the discourse on diversity? The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/why-is-disability-missing-from-the-discourse-on-diversity/
Dolmage, J. T. (2014). Disability rhetoric. Syracuse University Press.
Dundas, D. (2020, February 12). Children with disabilities aren’t seeing themselves in the books they read, exclusive Star survey finds. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/books/children-with-disabilities-aren-t-seeing-themselves-in-the-books-they-read-exclusive-star-survey/article_471fa01c-1941-578b-b9b3-83f6bbe6f3a7.html
Gill, M. (2015). Already doing it: Intellectual disability and sexual agency. University of Minnesota Press.
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Dis/ability and austerity: Beyond work and slow death. Disability & Society, 29(6), 980-984.
Greer, D. (2012). Maxed out. Orca Book Publishers.
Hughes, C., & Wheeler, E. A. (2018). Introduction: Mainstreaming literature for young people. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 12(3), 261-267.
Ignagni, E., Fudge Schormans, A., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2016). ‘Some people are not allowed to love’: Intimate citizenship in the lives of people labelled with intellectual disabilities. Disability & Society, 31(1), 131-135.
Johnson, H. M. (2006). Accidents of nature. Macmillan.
Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
Kendrick, J. (2004). Signifying something: Images of learning disability in fiction for children. Disability Studies Quarterly, 24(1). http://www.dsq-sds.org/
Kingsbury, M. (2021, April 28). The current state of disability representation in children’s books. Book Riot. https://bookriot.com/disability-representation-in-childrens-books/
Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. (2004). “May I?” About sexuality and love in the new generation with intellectual disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 22(3), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SEDI.0000039062.73691.cb
Markotić, N. (2017). Stories about strength and disability: How we get along. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 9(2), 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1353/jeu.2017.0030
Matthews, M. (2019). Why Sheldon Cooper can’t be Black: The visual rhetoric of autism and ethnicity. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 13(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2019.4
McMurchy-Barber, G. (2010). Free as a bird. Dundurn Press.
Meyer, A. E. (2013). “But she’s not retarded”: Contemporary adolescent literature humanizes disability but marginalizes intellectual disability. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 38(3), 267-283.
Mickenberg, J. L., & Nel, P. (2011). Radical children’s literature now! Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 36(4), 445-473.
Mitchell, D. T., Snyder, S. L., & Ware, L. (2014). “[Every] child left behind”: Curricular cripistemologies and the crip/queer art of failure. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8(3), 295-314.
Noonan, A., & Taylor Gomez, M. (2011). Who’s missing? awareness of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people with intellectual disability. Sexuality and Disability, 29(2), 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-010-9175-3
Osteen, M. (2013). Narrating autism. In J. Davidson & M. Orsini (Eds.), Worlds of autism: Across the spectrum of neurological difference (pp. 262-284). University of Minnesota Press.
Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate citizenship: private decisions and public dialogues. University of Washington Press.
Retznik, L., Wienholz, S., Höltermann, A., Conrad, I., & Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2021). “It tingled as if we had gone through an anthill.” Young people with intellectual disability and their experiences with relationship, sexuality and contraception. Sexuality and Disability, 39(2), 421438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-020-09670-z
Runswick-Cole, K., Mallett, R., & Timimi, S. (Eds.). (2016). Re-thinking autism: Diagnosis, identity, and equality. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Santinele Martino, A. (2020). The romantic and sexual lives of adults with intellectual disability in Ontario, Canada (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McMaster University.
Saunders, K. (2004). What disability studies can do for children’s literature. Disability Studies Quarterly, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v24i1.849
Schalk, S. (2016). Reevaluating the supercrip. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 10(1), 71-86.
Schalk, S. (2017). BeForever?: Disability in American girl historical fiction. Children’s Literature, 45(1), 164-187.
Schultz Nicholson, L. (2015). Fragile bones: Harrison & Anna. Clockwise Press.
Schultz Nicholson, L. (2017). Bent not Broken: Madeline & Justin. Clockwise Press.
Solis, S. (2004). The disability making factory: Manufacturing “differences” through children’s books. Disability Studies Quarterly, 24(1). https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/851/1026
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kimberlee Collins, Julie McGonegal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.
