Abstract
This note analyses a recent case of the European Court of Justice in which the applicant, a 14-year old rape victim, alleged that Bulgarian criminal law violated her rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights in pursuing a practice of only prosecuting rape where there was evidence of the use of physical force and active resistance. In upholding the applicant’s claims, the Court re-affirmed the positive obligation on states to adopt measures to ensure that fundamental rights under the Convention were secured. In particular, in the case of rape, this required the enactment and application of criminal laws effectively prescribing all acts of non-consensual sex and not just those involving physical violence. In this way the Court affirmed not only that rape was, in essence, a violation of personal sexual autonomy but also that legal systems which failed adequately to protect against all forms of rape risked operating in breach of Convention obligations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Bunch (1999) ArticleTitle“Women’s Rights as Human Rights: Towards a Revision of Human Rights” Human Rights Quarterly 12 486
D. Buss (2002) ArticleTitle“Prosecuting Mass Rape: Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic” Feminist Legal Studies 10 91–99 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014965414217
H. Charlesworth (1994) “What are ‘Women’s Human Rights’ ” R. Cook (Eds) Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia 58–84
H. Dustin (Eds) (2004) Women and the Criminal Justice System Fawcett Society London
L. Gotell (2002) ArticleTitle“The Ideal Victim, the Hysterical Complainant and the Disclosure of Confidential Records: The Implications of the Charter for Sexual Assault Law” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 40 251–293
Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate and Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (H.M.C.P.S.I), A Report on the Joint Inspection into the Investigation and Prosecution of Cases Involving Allegations of Rape (London: H.M.C.P.S.I., 2002)
L. Kelly L Regan (2001) “Rape: the Forgotten Issue?” Child and Women Abuse Studies Unit London
L. Kelly L Regan (2003) “Rape: the Forgotten Issue?” Child and Women Abuse Studies Unit London
H Kennedy (2004) Just Law Chatto & Windus London
C MacKinnon (2001) Sex Equality Foundation Press New York
A McColgan (2000) Women Under the Law: The False Promise of Human Rights Longman London
A Mowbray (2004) The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights Hart Publishing Oxford
Ndashe, S., “The Duty to Protect Women from Sexual Violence in South Africa”, Feminist Legal Studies 12/2 (2004), 213–221
Palmer, S., “Feminism and the Promise of Human Rights: Possibilities and Paradoxes” in Visible Women: Essays in Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy, (eds.) S. James & S. Palmer (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002), 91–115, 104–108
Temkin, J., “Sexual History Evidence: Beware the Backlash”, Criminal Law Review (2003), 217–242
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Application no. 39272/98, 4 December 2003.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conaghan, J. Extending the Reach of Human Rights to Encompass Victims of Rape: M.C. V. Bulgaria . Feminist Legal Stud 13, 145–157 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-005-1462-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-005-1462-5