Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kotarbiński’s reism and the vienna circle

  • Articoli
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  1. F. Barone,Il neopositivismo logico, Laterza, Bari 19772.

  2. F. Barone, “La polémique sur les énoncés protocolaires dans l’épistémologie du Cercle de Vienne”, in J. Sebestik, A. Soulez (eds.),Le Cercle de Vienne, doctrines et controverses, Meridiens Klincksieck, Paris 1986, 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Betti,Logica ed esistenza in Stanislaw Leśniewski.

  4. Der logische Aufbau de Welt. From the Ital. transl.La costruzione logica del mondo, F.lli Fabbri, Milano 1966.

  5. R. Carnap, “Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie: das Fremdpsychische und der Realismusstreit”. From the Ital. transl. in [Carnap 1928].

  6. R. Carnap, “Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft”. From the Ital. transl. in R. Carnap,La filosofia della scienza, La Scuola, Brescia 1964, 45–101.

  7. R.Carnap, “Psychologie in physikalischer Sprache”,Erkenntnis, Bd. 3, H. 2/3, 107–142.

  8. R. Carnap, “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache”. From the Ital. transl. inIl Neoempirismo, ed. by. A. Pasquinelli, UTET, Torino 1969, 504–532.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Carnap,Philosophy and Logical Syntax, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

  10. R. Carnap,The Logical Syntax of Language, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

  11. R. Carnap, “Testability and Meaning”,Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, n. 4, 419–471; vol. 4, n. 1, 1–40.

  12. R. Carnap,Introduction to Symbolic Logic and its Applications, Dover, New York 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Carnap, “Intellectual Autobiography”. From the Ital. transl. in [Schilpp 1963], 1–85.

  14. R. Carnap,Risposte ed esposizioni sistematiche, in [Schilpp 1963].

  15. F. Coniglione, “Abstraction and Idealization in Hegel and Marx”, in J. Brzeziński, L. Nowak, T.A.F. Kuipers (eds.),Idealization I: General Problems, Rodopi, Amsterdam-Atlanta, 61–88.

  16. F. Coniglione, “Scientific Philosophy and Marxism in Poland”, in F. Coniglione, R. Poli, J. Woleński (eds.),Polish Scientific Philosophy: The Lvov-Warsaw School, Rodopi, Amsterdam / Atlanta, 69–114.

  17. F. Coniglione. “Le vie dell’astrazione”, inLogica e filosofia della scienza: problemi e prospettive (Atti del Congresso triennale della Società Italiana di Logica e Filosofia delle Scienze, Lucca, 7–10 gennaio 1993], ed. by C. Cellucci, M.C. Di Maio e G. Roncaglia, Edizioni ETS, Pisa 1994, 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Dappiano, “L’idealismo di Oxbridge tra Lotze e Meinong. A proposito delle origini della filosofia analitica”,Axiomathes, V, 2–3, 279–304.

  19. M. Dummett,Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie. From the Ital. transl.Alle origini della filosofia analitica, Il Mulino, Bologna 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Feigl, “Fisicalismo, unità della scienza e i fondamenti della psicologia”, from the Ital. transl. in Schilpp [1963]

  21. C.G. Hempel, “Analyse logique de la psychologie”,Revue de synthése, X, 27–42.

  22. M. Hempoliński, “Szkoła Iwowsko-warszawska na tle ruchu analitycznego w filozofii XX w”, in Hempoliński (red.),Polska Filozofia Analityczna. Analiza logiczna i semiotyczna w szkołe lwowsko-warszawskiej, Ossolineum, Wrocław et al., 9–42.

  23. E. Husserl,Logical Investigations, transl. by J.N. Findlay from the 2nd German Edition, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1970, vol. I.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Jadczak, “Kilka uwag o stosunku Kazimierza Twardowskiego do Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego”, in AA.AA.,Logika, praktyka, etyka: Przesłania filozofii Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego, Tow. Nauk. Prakseologii, Warszawa, 37–43.

  25. Z. A. Jordan,The Development of Mathematical Logic and Logical Positivism in Poland between Two Wars, Oxford Univ. Press, London.

  26. Z.A. Jordan,Philosophy and Ideology. The Development of Philosophy and Marxism-leninism in Poland since the Second World War, Reidel, Dordrecht.

  27. T. Kotarbiński,Sprawa istnienia przedmiotów idealnych, in [Kotarbitński 1993], 101–116.

  28. T. Kotarbiński,Elementy teorii poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk (3a ed. PWN, Warszawa 1986). From the Engl. transl.Gnosiology. The Scientific Approach to Theory of Knowledge, Pergamon Press, London et al. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  29. T. Kotarbiński, “Realizm radykalny”, in [Kotarbiński 1993], 248–251.

  30. T. Kotarbiński, “Die Hauptprobleme und Grundtendenzen der Philosophie in Polen”, from the Polish transl. in [Kotarbiński 1958b], 733–749.

  31. T. Kotarbiński, “O postawie reistycznej, czyli konkretystycznej”, from the Engl. transl. in [Kotarbiński 1929], 420–428.

  32. T. Kotarbiński,Kurs logiki dla prawników, in [Kotarbiński 1993], 273–433.

  33. T. Kotarbiński, “Z zagadnień klasyfikacji nazw”, from the Engl. transl. in [Kotarbiński 1929], 389–402.

  34. T. Kotarbiński, “Fazy rozwojowe konkretyzmu”, from the Engl. transl. in [Kotarbiński 1929], 429–437.

  35. T. Kotarbiński,Wybór pism, Tom II,Myśli o myśleniu, PWN, Warszawa.

  36. T. Kotarbiński, “Franz Brentano comme réiste”,Revue Int. de Philosophie, 4, 459–476.

  37. “Reism: Issues and Prospects”,Logique and Analyse, 11, 441–58

  38. T. Kotarbiński, “Wyst⇂pienie otwieraj⇂ce konferencja”, in J. Kmita (red.),Metodologiczne implikacje epistemologii marksistowskiej, Warszawa 1974.

  39. T. Kotarbiński,Dzieła wszystkie. Ontologia, teoria poznania i metodologia nauk, Ossolineum, Wrocław et al.

  40. C. Lejewski, “On the Dramatic Stage in the Development of Kotarbiński’s Pansomatism”, reprinted in [Woleński 1990].

  41. L. Lombardo-Radice,Istituzioni di algebra astratta, Feltrinelli, Milano.

  42. J. Łukasiewicz, “On the Creativity of Science”, in J. Łukasiewicz,Selected Works, North Holland, Amsterdam 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  43. A. Meinong, “Hume-Studien I: Zur Geschichte und Kritik de modernen Nominalismus”, inSitzungberichten der philosophischhistorischen Klasse der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Bd LXXXVII, 185–260.

  44. A. Meinong, “Hume-Studien II: Zur Relationstheorie”, inibid., Bd. CI, 573–752.

  45. O. Neurath, “Physicalism: The Philosophy of the Viennese Circle”,The Monist, 41, 618–23.

  46. O. Neurath, “Soziologie im Physikalismus”, inErkenntnis, II, 394–431. From the Engl. transl. in [Neurath 1983], 58–90.

  47. O. Neurath, “Physikalismus”, in Scientia, 50, 297–303. From the Engl. transl. in [Neurath 1983], 52–57.

  48. O. Neurath, “Protokollsätze”, inErkenntnis, III, 204–214. From the Engl. transl. in [Neurath 1983], 91–99.

  49. O. Neurath, “Radikaler Physikalismus und ‘wirkliche Welt’”, in Erkenntnis, 4, 346–62. From the Engl. transl. in [Neurath 1983], 100–14.

  50. O. Neurath,Le développement du Circle de Vienne et l’avenir de l’empirisme logique, Hermann, Paris. From the Ital. transl.,Il Circolo di Vienna e l’avvenire dell’empirismo logico, Armando, Roma 1977.

  51. O. Neurath,Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, Reidel, Dordrecht / Boston / Lancaster.

  52. L. Nowak, “Some Remarks on the Place of Logical Empiricism in 20th Century Philosophy”, in [Szaniawski 1989], 375–90.

  53. W.V.O. Quine, “Logic and the Reification of Universals”, inFrom a logical point of view, Harvard U.P., Cambridge (Mass.).

  54. R. Rand, “Kotarbińskis Philosophie”,Erkenntnis, 7, 92–120.

  55. B. Russell,The Principles of Mathematics, G. Allen and Unwin, London 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  56. B. Russell, “Review of A. Meinong,Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie”, Mind, 14, 530–538.

  57. M. Santambrogio,Forma e oggetto, Il Saggiatore, Milano.

  58. P.A. Schilpp,The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. From the Ital. trans.La filosofia di Rudolf Carnap, Il Saggiatore, Milano 1974, 2 voll.

    Google Scholar 

  59. M. Schlick, “Positivismus und Realismus”, from the Engl. transl. in [Schlick 1979], 259–84.

  60. M. Schlick, “Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis”, from the Engl. transl. in [Schlick 1979], 370–87.

  61. M. Schlick,Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Reidel, Dordrecht / Boston / London 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  62. H. Skolimowski,Polish Analytical Philosophy. A Survey and a Comparison with British Analytical Philosophy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

  63. P. Simons,Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

  64. P. Simons, “Nominalism in Poland”, in F. Coniglione, R. Poli, J. Woleński (eds.),Polish Scientific Philosophy: The Lvov-Warsaw School, Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta, 207–231.

  65. V.F. Sinisi, “Kotarbiński’s Theory of Genuine Names”, reprinted in [Woleński 1990b], 107–118.

  66. V.F. Sinisi, “Kotarbiński’s Theory of Pseudo-names”, reprinted in [Woleński 1990b], 119–136.

  67. V.F. Sinisi, “The Development of Ontology”,Topoi, vol. 2, n. 1, 53–61.

  68. B. Smith, “Kasimir Twardowski: An Essay on the Borderlines of Ontology”, in [Szaniawski 1989], 313–373.

  69. B. Smith, “Austrian Origin of Logical Positivism”, in [Szaniawski 1989], 19–53.

  70. B. Smith, “On the Phases of Reism”, reprinted in [Woleński 1990b], 137–183.

  71. K. Szaniawski, ed.,The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School, Kluwer Acad. Pub., Dordrecht/Boston/London.

  72. K. Twardowski, “Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung”, from the Ital. transl. inContenuto ed oggetto, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino 1988, 57–163.

    Google Scholar 

  73. K. Twardowski, “O czynnościach i wytworach. Kilka uwag z pogranicza psychologii, gramatyki i logiki”, in [Twardowski 1965], 217–240.

  74. K. Twardowski, “O istocie poję”, in [Twardowski 1965], 292–312.

  75. K. Twardowski,Wybrane pisma filozoficzne, PWN, Warszawa 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  76. H. Vaihinger,Die Philosophie des als ob. From the Ital. transl.La filosofia del “come se”, Ubaldini, Roma 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  77. T. Vogel, “Bemerkungen zur Aussagentheorie des radikalen Physikalismus”,Erkenntnis, 4, 160–4.

  78. B. von Juhos, “Empiricism and Physicalism”,Analysis 2, 81–92.

  79. S. WitkiewiczKrytyka “reizmu” — pogl⇂du Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego, in St. I. Witkiewicz,Zagadnienie psychofizyczne, PWN, Warszawa 1978, 117–167.

    Google Scholar 

  80. J. Woleński,Filozoficzna Szkoła lwowsko-warszawska, PWN, Warszawa.

  81. J. Woleński, “The Lvov-Warsaw School and the Vienna Circle”, in [Szaniawski 1989], 443–453.

  82. J. Woleński,Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht/Boston/London.

  83. J. Woleński,Kotarbiński, Wiedza Powsz., Warszawa.

  84. J. Woleński (ed.),Kotarbiński: Logic, Semantics and Ontology, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht/Boston/London.

  85. J. Woleński, “Szkoła lwowsko-warszawska: między brentanizmem a pozytywizmem”,Principia, VIII–IX, 69–89.

  86. J. Woleński, “Reism in the Brentanian Tradition”, inThe School of Franz Brentano, ed. by L. Albertazzi, M. Libardi and R. Poli, Kluwer, Dordrecht 1996, 357–377.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  87. J. Woleński,Szkoła Lwowsko-warszawska w polemikach, Wyd. Nauk. Scholar, Warszawa 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Processes, University of Catania, Italy

    Francesco Coniglione

Authors
  1. Francesco Coniglione
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coniglione, F. Kotarbiński’s reism and the vienna circle. Axiomathes 11, 37–69 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681768

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681768

Keywords

Search

Navigation