Abstract
I consider argumentation from the point of view of context-transcendent cognitive transformation through reference to the critical social theory of Jürgen Habermas. My aim is threefold. First, to make the case for a concept of context-transcendent cognitive transformation. Second, to clarify the transformatory role of argumentation itself by showing that, while argumentation may contribute constructively to context-transcendent cognitive transformation, such transformation presupposes the existence of a reality conceptually independent of argumentation. Third, to cast light on the problem of how to justify argumentatively the poetically formulated, novel and innovative semantic contents that may be required for context-transcendent cognitive transformation. I conclude that the difficulties involved in argumentatively assessing novel and innovative semantic contents should not be misconstrued as evidence of an unbridgeable gap between language and experience but rather suggest the need for a more dynamic normative conception of language and for a more receptive model of autonomous agency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Benhabib, S.: 1992, Situating the Self, Routledge, New York.
Cooke, M.:1994, Language and Reason, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cooke, M.: 1994a, ‘Realizingthe Post-Conventional Self’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 20(1/2), 87–101.
Cooke, M.:1999, ‘A Space of One's Own: Autonomy, Privacy, Liberty’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 25(1), 23–53.
Cooke, M.: 2000a, ‘Between “Objectivism” and “Contextualism”: TheNormative Foundations of Social Philosophy’, Critical Horizons 1(2), 193–227.
Cooke, M.:2000b, ‘Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy’, Political Studies 48(5), 947–969.
Cooke, M.: 2001a, ‘Socio-Cultural Learning as a “Transcendental Fact”: Habermas'sPostmetaphysical Perspective’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8, 3, 63–89.
Cooke, M.: 2001b, ‘Truth and Meaning in Habermas's Pragmatics’, European Journal ofPhilosophy 9(1), 1–23.
Cooke, M.: 2002, ‘Die Stellung der Religion bei JürgenHabermas’, in K. Dethloff, L. Nagl and F. Wolfram (eds.), Religion: Modern/Postmoderne. Philosophisch-theologisiche Erkundungen, Vienna, KAV.
Habermas, J.: 1979, ‘Consciousness-Raising or Redemptive Criticism — the Contemporaneity of Walter Benjamin’, New German Critique 17, 29–59.
Habermas, J.: 1979a, Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. T. McCarthy,Heinemann, London.
Habermas, J.: 1982, ‘A Reply to my Critics’, in J. B. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas: Critical Debates, Macmillan, London, pp. 219–283.
Habermas, J.: 1987, The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2, trans. T. McCarthy, BeaconPress, Boston.
Habermas, J.: 1990, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. C. Lenhardtand S. Weber Nicholsen, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Habermas, J.: 1992, Postmetaphysical Thinking,trans. W. M. Hohengarten, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Habermas, J.: 1996, Die Einbeziehung desAndersen, Suhrhamp, Frankfurt am Main.
Habermas, J.: 1998, On the Pragmatics of Communication,edited by M. Cooke, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Habermas, J.: 1999, Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung,Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
Honneth, A.: 2000, ‘The Possibility of a Disclosing Critique ofSociety: The Dialectic of Enlightenment in Light of Current Debates in Social Criticism’, Constellations 7(1), 116–127.
Jakobson, R.: 1960, ‘Linguistics and Poetics’, in T. A. Sebeok(ed.), Style in Language, Cambridge, MA, pp. 350–377.
Kettner, M.: 1996, ‘Gute Gründe.Thesen zur diskursiven Vernunft’, in K.-O. Apel and M. Kettner (eds.), Diskursive Rationalität, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
Kompridis, N.: 1999, ‘Heidegger's Challenge and the Future ofCritical Theory’, in P. Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader, Blackwell, Cambridge.
Rorty, R.: 1985, ‘Solidarity or Objectivity?’, in J. Rajchman and C. West (eds.), Post-Analytic Philosophy, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 3–19.
Rorty, R.: 1993, ‘Putnam andthe Relativist Menace’, Journal of Philosophy 90(9), 443–461.
Smith, N.: 1997, StrongHermeneutics, Routledge, London.
Taylor, C.: 1992, Sources of the Self, Cambridge University Press, NewYork.
Tiedemann, R.: 1983, ‘Historical Materialism or Political Messianism? An Interpretation of theTheses on the Concept of History’, in G. Smith (ed.), Benjamin, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Wellmer, A.: 1991, The Persistence of Modernity, trans. D. Midgley, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Whitebook, J.: 1985, ‘Reason and Happiness: Some Psychoanalytic Themes in CriticalTheory’, in R. Bernstein (ed.), Habermas and Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooke, M. Argumentation and Transformation. Argumentation 16, 81–110 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014914924724
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014914924724