Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Against the Current: Social Pathways and the Pursuit of Enduring Change

  • Legislation
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radical innovations and practices frequentlyfind themselves in an inhospitable environment,struggling against the gravitational force ofdominant norms, practices and relations. Thispaper explores the problems radical changeconfronts in its attempts to become sustainable.Against the postmodern valorisation of thetransient and ephemeral, the paper argues forthe importance of routinisation and repetitionin the process of creating and sustainingchange. A metaphor of social pathways isdeveloped to explore how new routines arecreated through de jure (governance) andde facto (usage) means. The paper arguesthat, in contrast to governance, the emergentdurability generated by usage enables routinesto outlive their conditions of existence.At the same time, routines at odds with theirsocial and institutional environment tend overtime to disappear. The second half of the paperdraws on four British attempts to introduce newpathways: lesbian and gay local governmentinitiatives, Conservative education reforms,Greenham Common Women's Peace Camp and LocalExchange Trading Systems (LETS). Through theseexamples, the paper reflects on attempts tocreate more conducive environments, and some ofthe difficulties this generates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Ball, S., Markets, Morality and Equality in Education, Hillcole Group Paper 5, (London: Tufnell Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., “Education Policy, Power Relations and Teachers' Work”, British Journal of Educational Studies 41 (1993), 106-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, W. andSolomos, J. (eds.), Race and Local Politics (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S., “Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution”, Organization Studies 18 (1997), 93-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. andProops, J., Citizenship, Sustainability and Environmental Research (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, F., “The Loaded Dice-Private Sector Involvement in Education”, Education Review 13 (2000), 49-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L., “Back to the Future: The Development of Educational Policy in England”, Journal of Educational Administration 37 (1999), 200-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tovim, G. et al., The Local Politics of Race (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, L., “Beyond Legal Pluralism: Towards a New Approach to Law in the Informal Sector”, Social and Legal Studies 3 (1994), 223-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwood, C., On the Perimeter (London: Flamingo, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, M. andFudge, C. (eds.), Local Socialism? (London: Macmillan, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., The Logic of Practice (Cambridge: Polity, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., Sociology in Question (London: Sage, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., In Other Words (Cambridge: Polity, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. andOlsen, J., The Reforming Organization (London: Routledge, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J., Gender Trouble (New York: Routledge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J., Bodies that Matter (New York: Routledge, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C., “Habitus, Field, and Capital: The Question of Historical Specificity”, in Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, ed. C. Calhoun et al. (Cambridge: Polity, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carabine, J., “Invisible Sexualities: Sexuality, Politics and Influencing Policy-Making”, in A Simple Matter of Justice? ed. A. Wilson (London: Cassell, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. andNewman, J., The Managerial State (London: Sage, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I., “Structuration Theory and Social Praxis”, in Social Theory Today, ed. A. Giddens andJ. Turner (Cambridge: Polity, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conaghan, J. “Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law”, Journal of Law and Society 27 (2000), 351-385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D., Sexing the City: Lesbian and Gay Politics within the Activist State (London: Rivers Oram, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D., “Defiance and Non-Compliance: Religious Education and the Implementation Problem”, Current Legal Problems 48 (1995a), 253-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D., Power in Struggle: Feminism, Sexuality and the State (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D., “Local Government Legal Consciousness in the Shadow of Juridification”, Journal of Law and Society 22 (1995c), 506-526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D., “Institutional Illegality and Disobedience: Local Government Narratives”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 16 (1996), 255-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D., Governing Out of Order: Space, Law and the Politics of Belonging (London: Rivers Oram, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T., In Place/Out of Place (Minneapolis: Minnesota Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M., The Practice of Everyday Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R.,Brehony, K. andHeath, S., “Governors, Schools and theMiasma of the Market”, British Educational Research Journal 20 (1994), 535-549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demaine, J., “Teachers' Work, Curriculum and the New Right”, British Journal of Sociology of Education 9 (1988), 247-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. andPowell, W., “Introduction”, in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. W. Powell andP. DiMaggio (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K.,Davis, A. andRummery, K., “Needs Assessment, Street-Level Bureaucracy and the New Community Care”, Social Policy and Administration 33 (1999), 262-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewick, P. andSilbey, S., “Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness”, New England Law Review 26 (1992), 731-749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., “Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change”, Organization Science 11 (2000), 611-629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, R., “Managerialism in Education”, in Managing Social Policy, ed. J. Clarke et al. (London: Sage, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G., “The Explanation of Consumer Behaviour: From Social Cognition to Environmental Control”, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 12 (1997), 229-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, S.,Ball, S. andBowe, R., “Values and Ethics in the Education Market Place: The Case of Northwark Park”, International Studies in Sociology of Education 3 (1993), 233-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., The Constitution of Society ( Cambridge: Polity, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grendstad, G. and Selle, P., “Cultural Theory and the New Institutionalism”, Journal of Theoretical Politics 7 (1995), 5-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R. andHinings, C., “Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism”, Academy of Management Review 21 (1996), 1022-1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyford, J., The Politics of Local Socialism ( London: George Allen & Unwin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K., “ 'Anarchy Doesn't Work Unless You Think About It': Intellectual Interpretation and DIY Culture”, Area 31 (1999), 209-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halford, S., “Feminist Change in a Patriarchal Organisation: The Experiences of Women' Initiatives in Local Government and Implications for Feminist Perspectives on State Institutions”, in Gender and Bureaucracy, ed. M. Savage andA. Witz (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, R., “Market Relationships and the Management of Teachers”, British Journal of Sociology of Education 15 (1994), 41-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, R., “Profit and Power: Business and Education Action Zones”, Education Review 13 (2000), 71-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepple, B. andSzyszczak, E. (eds.), Discrimination: The Limits of Law (London: Mansell, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervey, T. andShaw, J., “Women,Work and Care:Women' Dual Role and Double Burden in EC Sex Equality Law”, Journal of European Social Policy 8 (1998), 43-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilke, K., “The Illusion on Permanence; Work Motivation and Membership Turnover at Twin Oaks Community”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (2000), 157-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggett, P., “New Modes of Control in the Public Service”, Public Administration 74 (1996), 9-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckman, L. andHill, T., “Local Management of Schools: Rationality and Decision-Making in the Employment of Teachers”, Oxford Review of Education 20 (1994), 185-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J., “Organizing Sexualities, Organizing Inequalities: Lesbians and Gay Men in Public Service Occupations”, Gender, Work and Organization 6 (1999), 134-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhetveen, K., “Can Gender Equality be Institutionalized?”, International Sociology 14 (1999), 403-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R., Pierre Bourdieu (London: Routledge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M. andZajac, E., “Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change”, American Sociological Review 61 (1996), 812-836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N., Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory (Oxford: Hart, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansley, S. et al., Councils in Conflict: The Rise and Fall of the Municipal Left (Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., “Moral Money? LETS and the Social Construction of Local Economic Geographies in Southeast England”, Environment and Planning A 28 (1996), 1377-1394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R., “For Utopia: The (Limits of the) Utopian Function in Late Capitalist Society”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (2000), 25-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin, M., Legality and Locality: The Role of Law in Central-Local Government Relations (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V., “Varieties of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal”, Public Administration 74 (1996), 181-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lushington, M., “New Labour' Secret Garden: The Privatisation of Public Education”, Education Review 13 (2000), 59-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. andOlsen, J., “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life”, American Political Science Review 78 (1983), 734-749.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. andOlsen, J., Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: Free Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marren, E. andLevačić, R., “Senior Management, Classroom Teacher and Governor Responses to Local Management of Schools”, Educational Management and Administration 22 (1994), 39-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L., “Michel de Certeau and the Ambivalent Everyday”, Social Semiotics 6 (1996), 61-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, B., From Utopian Dreaming to Communal Reality. Co-operative Lifestyles in Australia (Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moi, T., “Appropriating Bourdieu: Feminist Theory and Pierre Bourdieu' Sociology of Culture”, New Literary History 22 (1991), 1017-1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C., Dimensions of Radical Democracy (London: Verso, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, N., Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? (London: Routledge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, K. (ed.), Whatever Happened to Equal Opportunities in Schools (Buckingham: Open University, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J., “Gender and Cultural Change”, in Gender, Culture and Organisational Change, ed. C. Itzin andJ. Newman (London: Routledge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J.,Martin, J.,McKeown, P. andRanson, S., “Towards a Learning Profession: Changing Codes of Occupational Practice within the New Management of Education”, British Journal of Education 18 (1997), 5-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, C., “Gender Equality in 'The Most Equal Country in the World': Money and Marriage in Sweden”, Sociological Review 47 (1999), 766-793.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Doherty, R.,Dürrschmidt, J.,Jowers, P. andPurdue, D., “Local Exchange and Trading Schemes: A Useful Strand of Community Economic Development Policy?”, Environment and Planning A 31 (1999), 1639-1653.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donovan, K. andSzyszczak, E. (1988) Equality and Sex Discrimination Law (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C., “The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization”, Organization Studies 13 (1992), 563-588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A., “Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm”, Journal of Management Studies 24 (1987), 649-670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdue, D.,Durrschmidt, J.,Jowers, P. andO'Doherty, R., “DIY Culture and Extended Milieux: LETS, Veggie Boxes and Festivals”, Sociological Review 45 (1997), 645-667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseneil, S., Disarming Patriarchy (Buckingham: Open University, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseneil, S., Common Women, Uncommon Practices: The Queer Feminisms of Greenham (London and New York: Cassell, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. de Sousa, “Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law”, Journal of Law and Society 14 (1987), 279-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargisson, L., Contemporary Feminist Utopianism ( London: Routledge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargisson, L., Utopian Bodies and the Politics of Transgression (London, Routledge, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J., “Importing Gender: The Challenge of Feminism and the Analysis of the EU Legal Order”, Journal of European Public Policy 7 (2000), 406-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilling, C., “Reconceptualising Structure and Agency in the Sociology of Education: Structuration Theory and Schooling?”, British Journal of Education 13 (1992), 69-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C., Law, Crime and Sexuality ( London: Sage, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha, B., “The Folly of the 'social Scientific' Concept of Legal Pluralism”, Journal of Law and Society 20 (1993), 192-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha, B., “A Non-Essentialist Version of Legal Pluralism”, Journal of Law and Society 27 (2000), 296-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, L., “Local Exchange Trading Systems in the United Kingdom: A Case of Re-embedding”, Environment and Planning A 28 (1996), 1361-1376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, A., “Lesbianism and the Labour Party: The GLC Experience”, Feminist Review 34 (1990), 56-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R., “Putting Giddens into Action: Social Systems and Managerial Agency”, Journal of Management Studies 29 (1992), 693-712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, C., “Bourdieu' Class”, in An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu, ed. R. Harker et al. (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., “The New Barter Economy: An Appraisal of Local Exchange and Trading Systems (LETS)”, Journal of Public Policy 16 (1996), 85-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A., Femininity in Dissent (London: Routledge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Law, Keele University, Keele, Staffs, ST5 5BG, UK

    Davina Cooper

Authors
  1. Davina Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, D. Against the Current: Social Pathways and the Pursuit of Enduring Change. Feminist Legal Studies 9, 119–148 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016728804359

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016728804359

Search

Navigation